IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Zhichao Qi, Guozhu Ye, Zhiyi Liu, Jie Zhang, Weidong Xie, Yu Li, Wenbin Yang
{"title":"A review of osteoporotic vertebral fracture animal models.","authors":"Zhichao Qi, Guozhu Ye, Zhiyi Liu, Jie Zhang, Weidong Xie, Yu Li, Wenbin Yang","doi":"10.1186/s12938-025-01372-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Osteoporotic vertebral fractures are a common outcome of osteoporosis, imposing a substantial economic burden. The development of reliable animal models is essential for advancing research. This review examines osteoporotic vertebral fracture models across various animal species.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review compares and analyzes the different approaches used to model osteoporotic vertebral fractures in experimental animals, synthesizing the existing design protocols.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Rats and sheep are the primary experimental animals utilized in vertebral fracture research. The predominant approach in model design remains the creation of bone defects to simulate vertebral fractures. The spontaneous fracture model is primarily applicable to small species, such as transgenic mice. Rabbits and zebrafish are not suitable for modeling vertebral fractures due to the low cancellous bone content in their lumbar. The bone loss in the lumbar cancellous bone of the dog osteoporosis model is minimal, making it unsuitable for fracture modeling.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The bone defect model remains the most widely used approach for osteoporotic vertebral fractures. However, the stress compression model shows promise as a potential focal point for future investigations.</p>","PeriodicalId":8927,"journal":{"name":"BioMedical Engineering OnLine","volume":"24 1","pages":"40"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioMedical Engineering OnLine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-025-01372-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介椎体骨质疏松性骨折是骨质疏松症的常见结果,造成了巨大的经济负担。开发可靠的动物模型对推动研究至关重要。本综述探讨了不同动物物种的骨质疏松性脊椎骨折模型:方法:综述比较和分析了用于建立实验动物骨质疏松性脊椎骨折模型的不同方法,综合了现有的设计方案:结果:大鼠和绵羊是脊椎骨折研究中使用的主要实验动物。模型设计的主要方法仍然是创建骨缺损来模拟椎体骨折。自发性骨折模型主要适用于小型物种,如转基因小鼠。兔子和斑马鱼由于腰部松质骨含量较低,不适合制作脊椎骨折模型。狗骨质疏松症模型的腰椎松质骨骨量损失极少,因此不适合用于骨折建模:结论:骨缺损模型仍是骨质疏松性脊椎骨折最广泛使用的方法。结论:骨缺损模型仍是骨质疏松性脊椎骨折最广泛使用的方法,但应力压缩模型有望成为未来研究的潜在焦点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A review of osteoporotic vertebral fracture animal models.

Introduction: Osteoporotic vertebral fractures are a common outcome of osteoporosis, imposing a substantial economic burden. The development of reliable animal models is essential for advancing research. This review examines osteoporotic vertebral fracture models across various animal species.

Methods: The review compares and analyzes the different approaches used to model osteoporotic vertebral fractures in experimental animals, synthesizing the existing design protocols.

Results: Rats and sheep are the primary experimental animals utilized in vertebral fracture research. The predominant approach in model design remains the creation of bone defects to simulate vertebral fractures. The spontaneous fracture model is primarily applicable to small species, such as transgenic mice. Rabbits and zebrafish are not suitable for modeling vertebral fractures due to the low cancellous bone content in their lumbar. The bone loss in the lumbar cancellous bone of the dog osteoporosis model is minimal, making it unsuitable for fracture modeling.

Conclusions: The bone defect model remains the most widely used approach for osteoporotic vertebral fractures. However, the stress compression model shows promise as a potential focal point for future investigations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BioMedical Engineering OnLine
BioMedical Engineering OnLine 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
79
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BioMedical Engineering OnLine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that is dedicated to publishing research in all areas of biomedical engineering. BioMedical Engineering OnLine is aimed at readers and authors throughout the world, with an interest in using tools of the physical and data sciences and techniques in engineering to understand and solve problems in the biological and medical sciences. Topical areas include, but are not limited to: Bioinformatics- Bioinstrumentation- Biomechanics- Biomedical Devices & Instrumentation- Biomedical Signal Processing- Healthcare Information Systems- Human Dynamics- Neural Engineering- Rehabilitation Engineering- Biomaterials- Biomedical Imaging & Image Processing- BioMEMS and On-Chip Devices- Bio-Micro/Nano Technologies- Biomolecular Engineering- Biosensors- Cardiovascular Systems Engineering- Cellular Engineering- Clinical Engineering- Computational Biology- Drug Delivery Technologies- Modeling Methodologies- Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology in Biomedicine- Respiratory Systems Engineering- Robotics in Medicine- Systems and Synthetic Biology- Systems Biology- Telemedicine/Smartphone Applications in Medicine- Therapeutic Systems, Devices and Technologies- Tissue Engineering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信