在属于不同生态类群的两种蚯蚓中,暴露于毫米尺度的微塑料颗粒不会导致体重减轻。

IF 5.8 3区 环境科学与生态学 0 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Vladislav D. Leonov, Andrey G. Zuev, Anna I. Zueva, Ivan V. Sotnikov, Alexei V. Tiunov
{"title":"在属于不同生态类群的两种蚯蚓中,暴露于毫米尺度的微塑料颗粒不会导致体重减轻。","authors":"Vladislav D. Leonov,&nbsp;Andrey G. Zuev,&nbsp;Anna I. Zueva,&nbsp;Ivan V. Sotnikov,&nbsp;Alexei V. Tiunov","doi":"10.1007/s11356-025-36357-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aim of this study was to estimate the effect of relatively large (1–5 mm) fragments of high-density polyethylene films on two widespread earthworm species belonging to different ecological groups—endogeic <i>Aporrectodea caliginosa</i> and epigeic <i>Lumbricus rubellus.</i> In a microcosm experiment lasting 8 weeks, we tested the food dilution hypothesis, which suggests that the adverse effect of microplastic on earthworms is caused by the dilution of food by plastic, which has zero energetic value. Both earthworm species ingested plastic particles, and both species were seemingly limited by the availability of food. In particular, the addition of food substrate (aspen litter) to the soil had a significant positive effect on the weight of <i>A. caliginosa</i>. In contrast to our expectations, microplastic at relatively high concentrations (0.3% and 2.3% w/w in the soil for <i>A. caliginosa</i>, and 33% and 48% w/w in the litter for <i>L. rubellus</i>) had no significant effect on earthworm biomass. This suggests that the food dilution effect is not likely to be the main mechanism of the adverse effect of microplastic on earthworms. Our work adds to the growing evidence that in many cases microplastic does not harm soil animals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":545,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science and Pollution Research","volume":"32 17","pages":"11072 - 11082"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exposure to mm-scale microplastic particles does not cause weight loss in two earthworm species belonging to different ecological groups\",\"authors\":\"Vladislav D. Leonov,&nbsp;Andrey G. Zuev,&nbsp;Anna I. Zueva,&nbsp;Ivan V. Sotnikov,&nbsp;Alexei V. Tiunov\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11356-025-36357-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The aim of this study was to estimate the effect of relatively large (1–5 mm) fragments of high-density polyethylene films on two widespread earthworm species belonging to different ecological groups—endogeic <i>Aporrectodea caliginosa</i> and epigeic <i>Lumbricus rubellus.</i> In a microcosm experiment lasting 8 weeks, we tested the food dilution hypothesis, which suggests that the adverse effect of microplastic on earthworms is caused by the dilution of food by plastic, which has zero energetic value. Both earthworm species ingested plastic particles, and both species were seemingly limited by the availability of food. In particular, the addition of food substrate (aspen litter) to the soil had a significant positive effect on the weight of <i>A. caliginosa</i>. In contrast to our expectations, microplastic at relatively high concentrations (0.3% and 2.3% w/w in the soil for <i>A. caliginosa</i>, and 33% and 48% w/w in the litter for <i>L. rubellus</i>) had no significant effect on earthworm biomass. This suggests that the food dilution effect is not likely to be the main mechanism of the adverse effect of microplastic on earthworms. Our work adds to the growing evidence that in many cases microplastic does not harm soil animals.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":545,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Science and Pollution Research\",\"volume\":\"32 17\",\"pages\":\"11072 - 11082\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Science and Pollution Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-025-36357-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science and Pollution Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11356-025-36357-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是评估相对较大(1-5 mm)的高密度聚乙烯薄膜碎片对两种分布广泛的不同生态类群的蚯蚓-内源的Aporrectodea caliginosa和外源的Lumbricus rubellus的影响。在为期8周的微观实验中,我们验证了食物稀释假说,即微塑料对蚯蚓的不良影响是由于食物被塑料稀释造成的,塑料的能值为零。这两种蚯蚓都摄入了塑料颗粒,而且这两种蚯蚓似乎都受到食物供应的限制。其中,土壤中添加食物基质(白杨凋落物)对木质素有显著的正向影响。与我们的预期相反,相对高浓度的微塑料对蚯蚓生物量没有显著影响(毛蕊草土壤中微塑料含量为0.3%和2.3% w/w,风铃草凋落物中微塑料含量为33%和48% w/w)。这表明食物稀释效应不太可能是微塑料对蚯蚓产生不良影响的主要机制。我们的研究进一步证明,在许多情况下,微塑料不会伤害土壤动物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exposure to mm-scale microplastic particles does not cause weight loss in two earthworm species belonging to different ecological groups

The aim of this study was to estimate the effect of relatively large (1–5 mm) fragments of high-density polyethylene films on two widespread earthworm species belonging to different ecological groups—endogeic Aporrectodea caliginosa and epigeic Lumbricus rubellus. In a microcosm experiment lasting 8 weeks, we tested the food dilution hypothesis, which suggests that the adverse effect of microplastic on earthworms is caused by the dilution of food by plastic, which has zero energetic value. Both earthworm species ingested plastic particles, and both species were seemingly limited by the availability of food. In particular, the addition of food substrate (aspen litter) to the soil had a significant positive effect on the weight of A. caliginosa. In contrast to our expectations, microplastic at relatively high concentrations (0.3% and 2.3% w/w in the soil for A. caliginosa, and 33% and 48% w/w in the litter for L. rubellus) had no significant effect on earthworm biomass. This suggests that the food dilution effect is not likely to be the main mechanism of the adverse effect of microplastic on earthworms. Our work adds to the growing evidence that in many cases microplastic does not harm soil animals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
17.20%
发文量
6549
审稿时长
3.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science and Pollution Research (ESPR) serves the international community in all areas of Environmental Science and related subjects with emphasis on chemical compounds. This includes: - Terrestrial Biology and Ecology - Aquatic Biology and Ecology - Atmospheric Chemistry - Environmental Microbiology/Biobased Energy Sources - Phytoremediation and Ecosystem Restoration - Environmental Analyses and Monitoring - Assessment of Risks and Interactions of Pollutants in the Environment - Conservation Biology and Sustainable Agriculture - Impact of Chemicals/Pollutants on Human and Animal Health It reports from a broad interdisciplinary outlook.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信