基于非均匀厚度分布的卸载几何的升主动脉瘤应力分析方法。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 BIOPHYSICS
Xiaoyu Liu, Zhihong Lin, Shihua Zhao, Fei Li, Qi Gao
{"title":"基于非均匀厚度分布的卸载几何的升主动脉瘤应力分析方法。","authors":"Xiaoyu Liu, Zhihong Lin, Shihua Zhao, Fei Li, Qi Gao","doi":"10.1007/s10237-025-01949-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Using finite element method (FEM) to compute wall stress is now a common way to assess ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms (ATAA) severity. Medical images can provide aortic geometry for FEM, but thickness information is lacked and the geometry is at loaded state. Therefore, in this study, an unloaded geometry with a non-uniform thickness distribution is reconstructed. Measurements of wall thickness are taken from resected tissue to accurately replicate the thickness distribution. Subsequently, a novel method, derived from the existing fixed-point iterative (FPI) approach, is developed and applied to estimate the unloaded aortic geometry. This new method involves updating the relaxation factor at each iteration to improve robustness by constraining it within a threshold and normalizing it. Compared to the traditional FPI method, this novel approach is better tailored to the aortic geometries examined in this study. The study compares stress results obtained from models with uniform and non-uniform aortic wall thickness, both with and without assuming unloaded conditions. Findings indicate that stress distribution of non-uniform geometry matches better to the measured damage extent. Stress distribution of unloaded geometry is similar to that of loaded geometry, while the use of unloaded geometry enhances the stress gradient. The stress analysis reveals variations across different directions and regions, with the second principal stress (SPS) magnitude that is more sensitive to the circumferential region than the first principal stress (FPS) and von Mises stress (VMS). There is an overlap area between the high SPS region and the most expanded region. The most dilated area usually matched with high SPS region for loaded and unloaded geometry or uniform and non-uniform geometry. Thus, although magnitude of SPS is smaller than that of FPS and of VMS, it is suggested to pay more attention to SPS in severity assessment of ATAA aneurysm.</p>","PeriodicalId":489,"journal":{"name":"Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stress analysis method for ascending aortic aneurysm based on unloaded geometry with non-uniform thickness distribution.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoyu Liu, Zhihong Lin, Shihua Zhao, Fei Li, Qi Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10237-025-01949-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Using finite element method (FEM) to compute wall stress is now a common way to assess ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms (ATAA) severity. Medical images can provide aortic geometry for FEM, but thickness information is lacked and the geometry is at loaded state. Therefore, in this study, an unloaded geometry with a non-uniform thickness distribution is reconstructed. Measurements of wall thickness are taken from resected tissue to accurately replicate the thickness distribution. Subsequently, a novel method, derived from the existing fixed-point iterative (FPI) approach, is developed and applied to estimate the unloaded aortic geometry. This new method involves updating the relaxation factor at each iteration to improve robustness by constraining it within a threshold and normalizing it. Compared to the traditional FPI method, this novel approach is better tailored to the aortic geometries examined in this study. The study compares stress results obtained from models with uniform and non-uniform aortic wall thickness, both with and without assuming unloaded conditions. Findings indicate that stress distribution of non-uniform geometry matches better to the measured damage extent. Stress distribution of unloaded geometry is similar to that of loaded geometry, while the use of unloaded geometry enhances the stress gradient. The stress analysis reveals variations across different directions and regions, with the second principal stress (SPS) magnitude that is more sensitive to the circumferential region than the first principal stress (FPS) and von Mises stress (VMS). There is an overlap area between the high SPS region and the most expanded region. The most dilated area usually matched with high SPS region for loaded and unloaded geometry or uniform and non-uniform geometry. Thus, although magnitude of SPS is smaller than that of FPS and of VMS, it is suggested to pay more attention to SPS in severity assessment of ATAA aneurysm.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":489,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-025-01949-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-025-01949-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

采用有限元法计算壁面应力是目前评估升胸主动脉瘤(ATAA)严重程度的常用方法。医学图像可以为有限元分析提供主动脉的几何形状,但缺乏厚度信息,且几何形状处于加载状态。因此,在本研究中,重构了具有非均匀厚度分布的卸载几何结构。从切除的组织中测量壁厚,以准确地复制厚度分布。随后,从现有的不动点迭代(FPI)方法中衍生出一种新的方法,并将其应用于估计无载荷主动脉几何形状。该方法在每次迭代时更新松弛因子,通过将松弛因子约束在阈值内并将其归一化来提高鲁棒性。与传统的FPI方法相比,这种新方法更适合本研究中检查的主动脉几何形状。该研究比较了均匀和非均匀主动脉壁厚度模型的应力结果,无论是否假设卸载条件。结果表明,非均匀几何应力分布与实测损伤程度吻合较好。卸载几何形状的应力分布与加载几何形状相似,而卸载几何形状的使用增强了应力梯度。应力分析揭示了不同方向和区域的差异,第二主应力(SPS)量级比第一主应力(FPS)和von Mises应力(VMS)对周向区域更敏感。在高SPS区域和最大扩展区域之间有一个重叠区域。对于加载和卸载几何形状或均匀和非均匀几何形状,最膨胀区域通常与高SPS区域相匹配。因此,虽然SPS的大小小于FPS和VMS,但建议在评估ATAA动脉瘤的严重程度时更加重视SPS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stress analysis method for ascending aortic aneurysm based on unloaded geometry with non-uniform thickness distribution.

Using finite element method (FEM) to compute wall stress is now a common way to assess ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms (ATAA) severity. Medical images can provide aortic geometry for FEM, but thickness information is lacked and the geometry is at loaded state. Therefore, in this study, an unloaded geometry with a non-uniform thickness distribution is reconstructed. Measurements of wall thickness are taken from resected tissue to accurately replicate the thickness distribution. Subsequently, a novel method, derived from the existing fixed-point iterative (FPI) approach, is developed and applied to estimate the unloaded aortic geometry. This new method involves updating the relaxation factor at each iteration to improve robustness by constraining it within a threshold and normalizing it. Compared to the traditional FPI method, this novel approach is better tailored to the aortic geometries examined in this study. The study compares stress results obtained from models with uniform and non-uniform aortic wall thickness, both with and without assuming unloaded conditions. Findings indicate that stress distribution of non-uniform geometry matches better to the measured damage extent. Stress distribution of unloaded geometry is similar to that of loaded geometry, while the use of unloaded geometry enhances the stress gradient. The stress analysis reveals variations across different directions and regions, with the second principal stress (SPS) magnitude that is more sensitive to the circumferential region than the first principal stress (FPS) and von Mises stress (VMS). There is an overlap area between the high SPS region and the most expanded region. The most dilated area usually matched with high SPS region for loaded and unloaded geometry or uniform and non-uniform geometry. Thus, although magnitude of SPS is smaller than that of FPS and of VMS, it is suggested to pay more attention to SPS in severity assessment of ATAA aneurysm.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.60%
发文量
119
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Mechanics regulates biological processes at the molecular, cellular, tissue, organ, and organism levels. A goal of this journal is to promote basic and applied research that integrates the expanding knowledge-bases in the allied fields of biomechanics and mechanobiology. Approaches may be experimental, theoretical, or computational; they may address phenomena at the nano, micro, or macrolevels. Of particular interest are investigations that (1) quantify the mechanical environment in which cells and matrix function in health, disease, or injury, (2) identify and quantify mechanosensitive responses and their mechanisms, (3) detail inter-relations between mechanics and biological processes such as growth, remodeling, adaptation, and repair, and (4) report discoveries that advance therapeutic and diagnostic procedures. Especially encouraged are analytical and computational models based on solid mechanics, fluid mechanics, or thermomechanics, and their interactions; also encouraged are reports of new experimental methods that expand measurement capabilities and new mathematical methods that facilitate analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信