Nima Broomand Lomer, Armin Nouri, Roshan Singh, Sonia Asgari
{"title":"放射组学模型在子宫内膜癌微卫星不稳定状态术前预测中的诊断性能:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Nima Broomand Lomer, Armin Nouri, Roshan Singh, Sonia Asgari","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-04933-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Microsatellite instability (MSI), caused by defects in mismatch repair (MMR) genes, serves as a critical molecular biomarker with therapeutic implications for endometrial cancer (EC). This study aims to assess the diagnostic performance of radiomics as a non-invasive approach for predicting MSI status in EC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search across PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane library and Clinical Trials was conducted. Quality assessment was performed using QUADAS-2 and METRICS. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) were computed using a bivariate model. Separate meta-analyses for radiomics and combined models were conducted. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were conducted to find potential sources of heterogeneity. Likelihood ratio scattergram was used to evaluate the clinical applicability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 9 studies (1650 patients) were included in the systematic review, with seven studies contributing to the meta-analysis of radiomics model and five for combined model. The pooled diagnostic performance of the radiomics model was as follows: sensitivity, 0.66; specificity, 0.89; PLR, 5.48; NLR, 0.43; DOR, 18.56; and AUC, 0.87. For combined model, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR, and AUC were 0.58, 0.94, 7.37, 0.50, 16.43, and 0.85, respectively. Subgroup analysis of radiomics models revealed that studies employing non-linear classifiers achieved superior performance compared to those utilizing linear classifiers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Radiomics showed promise as non-invasive tool for MSI prediction in EC, with potential clinical utility in guiding personalized treatments. However, further studies are required to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic performance of radiomics models for preoperative prediction of microsatellite instability status in endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Nima Broomand Lomer, Armin Nouri, Roshan Singh, Sonia Asgari\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00261-025-04933-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Microsatellite instability (MSI), caused by defects in mismatch repair (MMR) genes, serves as a critical molecular biomarker with therapeutic implications for endometrial cancer (EC). This study aims to assess the diagnostic performance of radiomics as a non-invasive approach for predicting MSI status in EC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search across PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane library and Clinical Trials was conducted. Quality assessment was performed using QUADAS-2 and METRICS. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) were computed using a bivariate model. Separate meta-analyses for radiomics and combined models were conducted. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were conducted to find potential sources of heterogeneity. Likelihood ratio scattergram was used to evaluate the clinical applicability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 9 studies (1650 patients) were included in the systematic review, with seven studies contributing to the meta-analysis of radiomics model and five for combined model. The pooled diagnostic performance of the radiomics model was as follows: sensitivity, 0.66; specificity, 0.89; PLR, 5.48; NLR, 0.43; DOR, 18.56; and AUC, 0.87. For combined model, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR, and AUC were 0.58, 0.94, 7.37, 0.50, 16.43, and 0.85, respectively. Subgroup analysis of radiomics models revealed that studies employing non-linear classifiers achieved superior performance compared to those utilizing linear classifiers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Radiomics showed promise as non-invasive tool for MSI prediction in EC, with potential clinical utility in guiding personalized treatments. However, further studies are required to validate these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Abdominal Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Abdominal Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-04933-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-04933-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:微卫星不稳定性(MSI)是由错配修复(MMR)基因缺陷引起的,是子宫内膜癌(EC)治疗的关键分子生物标志物。本研究旨在评估放射组学作为预测EC中MSI状态的非侵入性方法的诊断性能。方法:系统检索PubMed、Scopus、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane library和Clinical Trials。采用QUADAS-2和METRICS进行质量评估。采用双变量模型计算合并敏感性、特异性、阳性似然比(PLR)、阴性似然比(NLR)、诊断优势比(DOR)和曲线下面积(AUC)。分别对放射组学模型和联合模型进行meta分析。进行亚组分析和敏感性分析,寻找异质性的潜在来源。采用似然比散点图评价临床适用性。结果:系统评价共纳入9项研究(1650例患者),其中7项研究参与放射组学模型的meta分析,5项研究参与联合模型的meta分析。放射组学模型的综合诊断性能如下:敏感性为0.66;特异性,0.89;PLR 5.48;NLR 0.43;金龟子,18.56;AUC为0.87。联合模型的敏感性、特异性、PLR、NLR、DOR和AUC分别为0.58、0.94、7.37、0.50、16.43和0.85。放射组学模型的亚组分析显示,与使用线性分类器的研究相比,使用非线性分类器的研究取得了更好的表现。结论:放射组学作为一种无创预测EC MSI的工具,在指导个性化治疗方面具有潜在的临床应用价值。然而,需要进一步的研究来验证这些发现。
Diagnostic performance of radiomics models for preoperative prediction of microsatellite instability status in endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Purpose: Microsatellite instability (MSI), caused by defects in mismatch repair (MMR) genes, serves as a critical molecular biomarker with therapeutic implications for endometrial cancer (EC). This study aims to assess the diagnostic performance of radiomics as a non-invasive approach for predicting MSI status in EC.
Methods: A systematic search across PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane library and Clinical Trials was conducted. Quality assessment was performed using QUADAS-2 and METRICS. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) were computed using a bivariate model. Separate meta-analyses for radiomics and combined models were conducted. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were conducted to find potential sources of heterogeneity. Likelihood ratio scattergram was used to evaluate the clinical applicability.
Results: A total of 9 studies (1650 patients) were included in the systematic review, with seven studies contributing to the meta-analysis of radiomics model and five for combined model. The pooled diagnostic performance of the radiomics model was as follows: sensitivity, 0.66; specificity, 0.89; PLR, 5.48; NLR, 0.43; DOR, 18.56; and AUC, 0.87. For combined model, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR, and AUC were 0.58, 0.94, 7.37, 0.50, 16.43, and 0.85, respectively. Subgroup analysis of radiomics models revealed that studies employing non-linear classifiers achieved superior performance compared to those utilizing linear classifiers.
Conclusion: Radiomics showed promise as non-invasive tool for MSI prediction in EC, with potential clinical utility in guiding personalized treatments. However, further studies are required to validate these findings.
期刊介绍:
Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section.
Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology:
· Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR)
· Published in Cooperation with:
European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR)
European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR)
Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR)
· Efficient handling and Expeditious review
· Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style
· Global readership
· Readers can earn CME credits