Muhammad Osama Aziz, Muhammad Abbas, Fakhre Alam Khan, Naveed Ahmad, Fazli Yazdan, Hamad Aftab, Mohammad Irshad Khan, Zahid Ullah
{"title":"ECBC-2023和IECC-2021在巴基斯坦不同气候带住宅建筑能效比较","authors":"Muhammad Osama Aziz, Muhammad Abbas, Fakhre Alam Khan, Naveed Ahmad, Fazli Yazdan, Hamad Aftab, Mohammad Irshad Khan, Zahid Ullah","doi":"10.1002/eng2.70116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study presents a comparative analysis of the energy-saving potential of the newly developed Pakistani regulation, the Energy Conservation Building Code–2023, and the International Energy Conservation Code–2021 for residential buildings in Pakistan. Utilizing an EnergyPlus-based simulation tool, the energy consumption of a typical house was modeled in three different climate zones of Pakistan: 0B (hot and dry), 3B (warm dry), and 7B (very cold). The analysis focused on evaluating how improvements in the building envelope, as mandated by each code, impacted the overall energy consumption of the building. Results revealed that the Energy Conservation Building Code–2023 performs better than the International Energy Conservation Code–2021 in hot climates such as Karachi. Specifically, the Energy Conservation Building Code–2023 achieved a 24% reduction in annual energy consumption, compared to the 21.8% reduction achieved by the International Energy Conservation Code–2021. However, the International Energy Conservation Code–2021 demonstrates higher energy savings in warm and cold climates (Quetta and Skardu). In these zones (warm 3B and very cold 7B), the International Energy Conservation Code–2021 led to reductions of 47.32% and 79.5%, respectively, compared to 45.3% and 33.86% achieved by the Energy Conservation Building Code–2023. This variation in energy-saving potential is attributed to the stringent U-value standards set by the International Energy Conservation Code–2021, particularly for colder climates. The study evaluates the strengths and limitations of both codes concerning Pakistan's diverse climatic conditions, underscoring the need for region-specific energy conservation standards to optimize residential building efficiency. It highlights the necessity for ongoing Research and Development to enhance the effectiveness and nationwide applicability of the Energy Conservation Building Code–2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":72922,"journal":{"name":"Engineering reports : open access","volume":"7 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eng2.70116","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Energy Efficiency Comparison of ECBC–2023 and IECC–2021 for Residential Buildings in Different Climate Zones of Pakistan\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Osama Aziz, Muhammad Abbas, Fakhre Alam Khan, Naveed Ahmad, Fazli Yazdan, Hamad Aftab, Mohammad Irshad Khan, Zahid Ullah\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/eng2.70116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study presents a comparative analysis of the energy-saving potential of the newly developed Pakistani regulation, the Energy Conservation Building Code–2023, and the International Energy Conservation Code–2021 for residential buildings in Pakistan. Utilizing an EnergyPlus-based simulation tool, the energy consumption of a typical house was modeled in three different climate zones of Pakistan: 0B (hot and dry), 3B (warm dry), and 7B (very cold). The analysis focused on evaluating how improvements in the building envelope, as mandated by each code, impacted the overall energy consumption of the building. Results revealed that the Energy Conservation Building Code–2023 performs better than the International Energy Conservation Code–2021 in hot climates such as Karachi. Specifically, the Energy Conservation Building Code–2023 achieved a 24% reduction in annual energy consumption, compared to the 21.8% reduction achieved by the International Energy Conservation Code–2021. However, the International Energy Conservation Code–2021 demonstrates higher energy savings in warm and cold climates (Quetta and Skardu). In these zones (warm 3B and very cold 7B), the International Energy Conservation Code–2021 led to reductions of 47.32% and 79.5%, respectively, compared to 45.3% and 33.86% achieved by the Energy Conservation Building Code–2023. This variation in energy-saving potential is attributed to the stringent U-value standards set by the International Energy Conservation Code–2021, particularly for colder climates. The study evaluates the strengths and limitations of both codes concerning Pakistan's diverse climatic conditions, underscoring the need for region-specific energy conservation standards to optimize residential building efficiency. It highlights the necessity for ongoing Research and Development to enhance the effectiveness and nationwide applicability of the Energy Conservation Building Code–2023.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering reports : open access\",\"volume\":\"7 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eng2.70116\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering reports : open access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eng2.70116\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering reports : open access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eng2.70116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究对巴基斯坦新制定的住宅建筑节能法规《节能建筑规范2023》和国际节能规范2021的节能潜力进行了比较分析。利用基于energyplus的模拟工具,在巴基斯坦三个不同的气候带:0B(炎热干燥),3B(温暖干燥)和7B(非常寒冷)对典型房屋的能源消耗进行了建模。分析的重点是评估每个规范所要求的建筑围护结构的改进如何影响建筑的整体能耗。结果显示,在卡拉奇等炎热气候地区,节能建筑规范2023的性能优于国际节能规范2021。具体来说,《节能建筑规范2023》实现了24%的年能耗降低,而《国际节能规范2021》实现了21.8%的年能耗降低。然而,《2021年国际节能规范》表明,在温暖和寒冷气候(奎达和斯卡杜)下,节能效果更高。在这些区域(温暖的3B和极冷的7B),国际节能规范2021分别减少了47.32%和79.5%,而节能建筑规范2023分别减少了45.3%和33.86%。这种节能潜力的变化归因于2021年国际节能法规(International Energy Conservation Code-2021)制定的严格u值标准,特别是针对较冷的气候。该研究评估了两项规范在巴基斯坦不同气候条件下的优势和局限性,强调需要制定针对特定地区的节能标准,以优化住宅建筑的效率。它强调了正在进行的研究和开发的必要性,以提高节能建筑规范2023的有效性和全国适用性。
Energy Efficiency Comparison of ECBC–2023 and IECC–2021 for Residential Buildings in Different Climate Zones of Pakistan
This study presents a comparative analysis of the energy-saving potential of the newly developed Pakistani regulation, the Energy Conservation Building Code–2023, and the International Energy Conservation Code–2021 for residential buildings in Pakistan. Utilizing an EnergyPlus-based simulation tool, the energy consumption of a typical house was modeled in three different climate zones of Pakistan: 0B (hot and dry), 3B (warm dry), and 7B (very cold). The analysis focused on evaluating how improvements in the building envelope, as mandated by each code, impacted the overall energy consumption of the building. Results revealed that the Energy Conservation Building Code–2023 performs better than the International Energy Conservation Code–2021 in hot climates such as Karachi. Specifically, the Energy Conservation Building Code–2023 achieved a 24% reduction in annual energy consumption, compared to the 21.8% reduction achieved by the International Energy Conservation Code–2021. However, the International Energy Conservation Code–2021 demonstrates higher energy savings in warm and cold climates (Quetta and Skardu). In these zones (warm 3B and very cold 7B), the International Energy Conservation Code–2021 led to reductions of 47.32% and 79.5%, respectively, compared to 45.3% and 33.86% achieved by the Energy Conservation Building Code–2023. This variation in energy-saving potential is attributed to the stringent U-value standards set by the International Energy Conservation Code–2021, particularly for colder climates. The study evaluates the strengths and limitations of both codes concerning Pakistan's diverse climatic conditions, underscoring the need for region-specific energy conservation standards to optimize residential building efficiency. It highlights the necessity for ongoing Research and Development to enhance the effectiveness and nationwide applicability of the Energy Conservation Building Code–2023.