探讨性别在刻板印象、认知和治疗中的关联

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Elisabeth Irvine, William Li, Jordan Axt
{"title":"探讨性别在刻板印象、认知和治疗中的关联","authors":"Elisabeth Irvine,&nbsp;William Li,&nbsp;Jordan Axt","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Gender stereotypes take many forms. One relatively under-studied stereotype concerns gender and food. While prior work finds certain foods are viewed as more masculine or feminine, there is limited research on how the same food becomes gendered depending on portion size. Four studies (<em>N</em> = 2178) found that 1) participants held implicit and explicit associations between men with large portions and women with small portions, and 2) participants had better memory for counter-stereotypical pairings (e.g., women with large portions) than stereotype-consistent pairings. However, a field experiment (<em>N</em> = 182) failed to produce strong evidence that this association impacted behavior, as men did not receive reliably larger portions than women when being prepared identical orders during face-to-face interactions with servers at fast casual restaurants. These findings highlight the strength of the gender-portion association in cognition but suggest other factors (e.g., standardization) may constrain its influence on behavior.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48441,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 104755"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the gender-portion association in stereotypes, cognition, and treatment\",\"authors\":\"Elisabeth Irvine,&nbsp;William Li,&nbsp;Jordan Axt\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104755\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Gender stereotypes take many forms. One relatively under-studied stereotype concerns gender and food. While prior work finds certain foods are viewed as more masculine or feminine, there is limited research on how the same food becomes gendered depending on portion size. Four studies (<em>N</em> = 2178) found that 1) participants held implicit and explicit associations between men with large portions and women with small portions, and 2) participants had better memory for counter-stereotypical pairings (e.g., women with large portions) than stereotype-consistent pairings. However, a field experiment (<em>N</em> = 182) failed to produce strong evidence that this association impacted behavior, as men did not receive reliably larger portions than women when being prepared identical orders during face-to-face interactions with servers at fast casual restaurants. These findings highlight the strength of the gender-portion association in cognition but suggest other factors (e.g., standardization) may constrain its influence on behavior.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology\",\"volume\":\"119 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104755\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103125000368\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103125000368","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

性别刻板印象有多种形式。一个相对较少研究的刻板印象涉及性别和食物。虽然之前的研究发现,某些食物被认为更男性化或更女性化,但关于同一种食物如何根据份量来区分性别的研究有限。四项研究(N = 2178)发现,1)参与者对大份量的男性和小份量的女性有内隐和外显的联想,2)参与者对反刻板印象配对(例如,大份量的女性)的记忆优于与刻板印象一致的配对。然而,一项实地实验(N = 182)未能提供强有力的证据表明这种关联会影响行为,因为在快速休闲餐厅与服务员面对面互动时,当准备相同的订单时,男性收到的份量并不一定比女性大。这些发现强调了认知中性别部分关联的强度,但表明其他因素(例如,标准化)可能会限制其对行为的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the gender-portion association in stereotypes, cognition, and treatment
Gender stereotypes take many forms. One relatively under-studied stereotype concerns gender and food. While prior work finds certain foods are viewed as more masculine or feminine, there is limited research on how the same food becomes gendered depending on portion size. Four studies (N = 2178) found that 1) participants held implicit and explicit associations between men with large portions and women with small portions, and 2) participants had better memory for counter-stereotypical pairings (e.g., women with large portions) than stereotype-consistent pairings. However, a field experiment (N = 182) failed to produce strong evidence that this association impacted behavior, as men did not receive reliably larger portions than women when being prepared identical orders during face-to-face interactions with servers at fast casual restaurants. These findings highlight the strength of the gender-portion association in cognition but suggest other factors (e.g., standardization) may constrain its influence on behavior.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.90%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Social Psychology publishes original research and theory on human social behavior and related phenomena. The journal emphasizes empirical, conceptually based research that advances an understanding of important social psychological processes. The journal also publishes literature reviews, theoretical analyses, and methodological comments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信