“有点被逼到了这个角落:”探索长期寄宿护理中对暴力的性别解释和反应

IF 1.8 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Kirsten J. Brooks , Rachel V. Herron , Dale Spencer , Sheila Novek , Laura M. Funk , Katie Aubrecht , Christine Kelly , Douglas A. Brownridge , Lori E. Weeks
{"title":"“有点被逼到了这个角落:”探索长期寄宿护理中对暴力的性别解释和反应","authors":"Kirsten J. Brooks ,&nbsp;Rachel V. Herron ,&nbsp;Dale Spencer ,&nbsp;Sheila Novek ,&nbsp;Laura M. Funk ,&nbsp;Katie Aubrecht ,&nbsp;Christine Kelly ,&nbsp;Douglas A. Brownridge ,&nbsp;Lori E. Weeks","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Violence in long-term residential care (LTRC) is primarily directed at women who make up a disproportionate share of residents and staff, yet gender has been relatively understudied and undertheorized in research on violence in this setting. In this paper we draw together the concept of gender structure and Pierre Bourdieu's concepts of habitus and field to explore staff perspectives on violent situations and learn about gendered power dynamics in LTRC. Our analysis of interviews with 29 staff in two Canadian provinces explored how gender infused the ways in which staff interpreted, experienced, and responded to violence in LTRC. Gendered perceptions and assumptions manifested in how participants spoke of orienting to the importance of body size, strength, speed, and perceived capability when anticipating who might perpetrate violence. Likewise, gender and gendered bodily characteristics also appeared to shape work roles (e.g., who was expected to provide ‘back-up’ in violent situations). Staff accounts also provided insight into how past experiences of gender-based violence and gendered power dynamics outside of LTRC shaped violent situations and power dynamics inside LTRC. Lastly, in response to violent situations, staff routinely minimized, downplayed, and trivialized violence to cope with their positions within these situations, illuminating a gendered duty to care. Our findings advance understandings of gendered interpretations and strategies employed in response to violence in LTRC, raising questions about the consequences for both residents and staff.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74862,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100555"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Kind of backed into this corner:” exploring gendered interpretations and responses to violence in long-term residential care\",\"authors\":\"Kirsten J. Brooks ,&nbsp;Rachel V. Herron ,&nbsp;Dale Spencer ,&nbsp;Sheila Novek ,&nbsp;Laura M. Funk ,&nbsp;Katie Aubrecht ,&nbsp;Christine Kelly ,&nbsp;Douglas A. Brownridge ,&nbsp;Lori E. Weeks\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100555\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Violence in long-term residential care (LTRC) is primarily directed at women who make up a disproportionate share of residents and staff, yet gender has been relatively understudied and undertheorized in research on violence in this setting. In this paper we draw together the concept of gender structure and Pierre Bourdieu's concepts of habitus and field to explore staff perspectives on violent situations and learn about gendered power dynamics in LTRC. Our analysis of interviews with 29 staff in two Canadian provinces explored how gender infused the ways in which staff interpreted, experienced, and responded to violence in LTRC. Gendered perceptions and assumptions manifested in how participants spoke of orienting to the importance of body size, strength, speed, and perceived capability when anticipating who might perpetrate violence. Likewise, gender and gendered bodily characteristics also appeared to shape work roles (e.g., who was expected to provide ‘back-up’ in violent situations). Staff accounts also provided insight into how past experiences of gender-based violence and gendered power dynamics outside of LTRC shaped violent situations and power dynamics inside LTRC. Lastly, in response to violent situations, staff routinely minimized, downplayed, and trivialized violence to cope with their positions within these situations, illuminating a gendered duty to care. Our findings advance understandings of gendered interpretations and strategies employed in response to violence in LTRC, raising questions about the consequences for both residents and staff.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SSM. Qualitative research in health\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100555\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SSM. Qualitative research in health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321525000332\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321525000332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

长期住宿护理中的暴力行为主要针对妇女,她们在住院医生和工作人员中所占的比例不成比例,但在对这种情况下的暴力行为的研究中,性别问题的研究相对不足,理论也不充分。在本文中,我们将性别结构的概念与皮埃尔·布迪厄的惯习和场域的概念结合起来,探讨员工对暴力情境的看法,并了解LTRC中的性别权力动态。我们对加拿大两个省的29名工作人员的访谈进行了分析,探讨了性别如何影响工作人员在ltc中解释、经历和应对暴力的方式。性别观念和假设体现在参与者在预测谁可能实施暴力时,如何谈论身体大小、力量、速度和感知能力的重要性。同样,性别和性别化的身体特征似乎也塑造了工作角色(例如,谁被期望在暴力情况下提供“支援”)。工作人员的叙述还使人们深入了解了过去在ltc之外的基于性别的暴力和性别权力动态是如何影响ltc内部的暴力局势和权力动态的。最后,在应对暴力情况时,工作人员通常会尽量减少、淡化和轻视暴力,以应对他们在这些情况下的职位,这表明了一种性别责任。我们的研究结果促进了对LTRC中应对暴力行为的性别解释和策略的理解,并提出了关于居民和工作人员后果的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Kind of backed into this corner:” exploring gendered interpretations and responses to violence in long-term residential care
Violence in long-term residential care (LTRC) is primarily directed at women who make up a disproportionate share of residents and staff, yet gender has been relatively understudied and undertheorized in research on violence in this setting. In this paper we draw together the concept of gender structure and Pierre Bourdieu's concepts of habitus and field to explore staff perspectives on violent situations and learn about gendered power dynamics in LTRC. Our analysis of interviews with 29 staff in two Canadian provinces explored how gender infused the ways in which staff interpreted, experienced, and responded to violence in LTRC. Gendered perceptions and assumptions manifested in how participants spoke of orienting to the importance of body size, strength, speed, and perceived capability when anticipating who might perpetrate violence. Likewise, gender and gendered bodily characteristics also appeared to shape work roles (e.g., who was expected to provide ‘back-up’ in violent situations). Staff accounts also provided insight into how past experiences of gender-based violence and gendered power dynamics outside of LTRC shaped violent situations and power dynamics inside LTRC. Lastly, in response to violent situations, staff routinely minimized, downplayed, and trivialized violence to cope with their positions within these situations, illuminating a gendered duty to care. Our findings advance understandings of gendered interpretations and strategies employed in response to violence in LTRC, raising questions about the consequences for both residents and staff.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
163 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信