Brayan S. Moreno-Caballero , Pasiano Rivas-García , Alejandro Estrada-Baltazar , Juan P. Paniagua-Martínez , Jean-Marc Leveque , José J. Cano-Gómez
{"title":"探讨深层共晶溶剂在生物柴油中回收污泥的潜力:基于生命周期评估方法的循环经济建议","authors":"Brayan S. Moreno-Caballero , Pasiano Rivas-García , Alejandro Estrada-Baltazar , Juan P. Paniagua-Martínez , Jean-Marc Leveque , José J. Cano-Gómez","doi":"10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.107845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents an innovative cleaner production strategy for the energetic valorization of greasy wastewater sludge (WS) through biodiesel synthesis, using choline chloride (ChCl)-based deep eutectic solvents (DES) with p-toluenesulfonic acid (PTSA) and oxalic acid (OA) as green catalysts. Biodiesel production was evaluated using two approaches: (i) a one-step cleaner production process with different ChCl:PTSA and ChCl:OA ratios, and (ii) a conventional two-step method (esterification-transesterification) with H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> and CaO as catalysts. The environmental impact of both production methods was assessed via life cycle assessment (LCA). Yields of up to 53 % were achieved in extracting grease from WS. The conventional two-step process showed biodiesel production yields of 88 % at 9 h, while the one-step process showed yields of up to 98 % with ChCl:PTSA and 59 % with ChCl:OA at molar ratios of (0.1 and 0.2) DES:FFA, and (4 and 6) hours, respectively. ChCl:PTSA emerged as the superior catalyst, providing higher energy efficiency, reduced reaction times, and up to a 56 % reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions compared to the two-step method. Its application resulted in a 64 % reduction in GHG emissions compared to conventional diesel, mainly due to reduced energy demands during fat extraction and reaction processes. However, further optimization is necessary to minimize methanol and energy consumption during esterification/transesterification, as these factors account for 50 % and 20 % of total GHG emissions, respectively, when using DES-based biodiesel production. This work highlights the potential of DES as a sustainable and energy-efficient alternative for biodiesel production, paving the way for greener solutions in WS valorization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":253,"journal":{"name":"Biomass & Bioenergy","volume":"198 ","pages":"Article 107845"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the potential for recycling sewage sludge in biodiesel using deep eutectic solvents: A proposal of circular economy based on life cycle assessment approach\",\"authors\":\"Brayan S. Moreno-Caballero , Pasiano Rivas-García , Alejandro Estrada-Baltazar , Juan P. Paniagua-Martínez , Jean-Marc Leveque , José J. Cano-Gómez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.107845\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study presents an innovative cleaner production strategy for the energetic valorization of greasy wastewater sludge (WS) through biodiesel synthesis, using choline chloride (ChCl)-based deep eutectic solvents (DES) with p-toluenesulfonic acid (PTSA) and oxalic acid (OA) as green catalysts. Biodiesel production was evaluated using two approaches: (i) a one-step cleaner production process with different ChCl:PTSA and ChCl:OA ratios, and (ii) a conventional two-step method (esterification-transesterification) with H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> and CaO as catalysts. The environmental impact of both production methods was assessed via life cycle assessment (LCA). Yields of up to 53 % were achieved in extracting grease from WS. The conventional two-step process showed biodiesel production yields of 88 % at 9 h, while the one-step process showed yields of up to 98 % with ChCl:PTSA and 59 % with ChCl:OA at molar ratios of (0.1 and 0.2) DES:FFA, and (4 and 6) hours, respectively. ChCl:PTSA emerged as the superior catalyst, providing higher energy efficiency, reduced reaction times, and up to a 56 % reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions compared to the two-step method. Its application resulted in a 64 % reduction in GHG emissions compared to conventional diesel, mainly due to reduced energy demands during fat extraction and reaction processes. However, further optimization is necessary to minimize methanol and energy consumption during esterification/transesterification, as these factors account for 50 % and 20 % of total GHG emissions, respectively, when using DES-based biodiesel production. This work highlights the potential of DES as a sustainable and energy-efficient alternative for biodiesel production, paving the way for greener solutions in WS valorization.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomass & Bioenergy\",\"volume\":\"198 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107845\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomass & Bioenergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0961953425002569\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomass & Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0961953425002569","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exploring the potential for recycling sewage sludge in biodiesel using deep eutectic solvents: A proposal of circular economy based on life cycle assessment approach
This study presents an innovative cleaner production strategy for the energetic valorization of greasy wastewater sludge (WS) through biodiesel synthesis, using choline chloride (ChCl)-based deep eutectic solvents (DES) with p-toluenesulfonic acid (PTSA) and oxalic acid (OA) as green catalysts. Biodiesel production was evaluated using two approaches: (i) a one-step cleaner production process with different ChCl:PTSA and ChCl:OA ratios, and (ii) a conventional two-step method (esterification-transesterification) with H2SO4 and CaO as catalysts. The environmental impact of both production methods was assessed via life cycle assessment (LCA). Yields of up to 53 % were achieved in extracting grease from WS. The conventional two-step process showed biodiesel production yields of 88 % at 9 h, while the one-step process showed yields of up to 98 % with ChCl:PTSA and 59 % with ChCl:OA at molar ratios of (0.1 and 0.2) DES:FFA, and (4 and 6) hours, respectively. ChCl:PTSA emerged as the superior catalyst, providing higher energy efficiency, reduced reaction times, and up to a 56 % reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions compared to the two-step method. Its application resulted in a 64 % reduction in GHG emissions compared to conventional diesel, mainly due to reduced energy demands during fat extraction and reaction processes. However, further optimization is necessary to minimize methanol and energy consumption during esterification/transesterification, as these factors account for 50 % and 20 % of total GHG emissions, respectively, when using DES-based biodiesel production. This work highlights the potential of DES as a sustainable and energy-efficient alternative for biodiesel production, paving the way for greener solutions in WS valorization.
期刊介绍:
Biomass & Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers and short communications, review articles and case studies on biological resources, chemical and biological processes, and biomass products for new renewable sources of energy and materials.
The scope of the journal extends to the environmental, management and economic aspects of biomass and bioenergy.
Key areas covered by the journal:
• Biomass: sources, energy crop production processes, genetic improvements, composition. Please note that research on these biomass subjects must be linked directly to bioenergy generation.
• Biological Residues: residues/rests from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (palm, sugar etc), processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW). Papers on the use of biomass residues through innovative processes/technological novelty and/or consideration of feedstock/system sustainability (or unsustainability) are welcomed. However waste treatment processes and pollution control or mitigation which are only tangentially related to bioenergy are not in the scope of the journal, as they are more suited to publications in the environmental arena. Papers that describe conventional waste streams (ie well described in existing literature) that do not empirically address ''new'' added value from the process are not suitable for submission to the journal.
• Bioenergy Processes: fermentations, thermochemical conversions, liquid and gaseous fuels, and petrochemical substitutes
• Bioenergy Utilization: direct combustion, gasification, electricity production, chemical processes, and by-product remediation
• Biomass and the Environment: carbon cycle, the net energy efficiency of bioenergy systems, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues.