吉尔吉斯斯坦家庭能源对提高居民用电整体电价的反应

IF 9.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Akylai Muktarbek kyzy , Frode Alfnes
{"title":"吉尔吉斯斯坦家庭能源对提高居民用电整体电价的反应","authors":"Akylai Muktarbek kyzy ,&nbsp;Frode Alfnes","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study examines the effects of the increasing block tariffs on residential electricity consumption introduced in Kyrgyzstan in January 2015. We use seven years of data from the Kyrgyz Integrated Household Survey and difference-in-differences analysis to show that the policy's effects varied across income groups and geographic locations. Most households are unaffected by the block tariffs' introduction, as their consumption is significantly below the 700 kWh per month threshold. Households with higher incomes and those in colder regions were impacted more by the policy than their lower-income and warmer-region counterparts. Furthermore, there was a noticeable increase in energy-stacking behaviors, with households utilizing coal, wood, and dung during the heating season. This increase was evident among households already using these alternative energy sources (intensive margin) and new adopters (extensive margin). The long-term effect of the block tariffs on energy stacking proved to be more pronounced than the short-term effects. These findings give insight into energy consumption under increasing block tariffs for residential electricity in a lower-middle-income country in Central Asia. They emphasize the need to consider variations in regional climates and the effect of energy stacking when designing energy policies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":"203 ","pages":"Article 114629"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Household energy responses to the introduction of increasing block tariffs on residential electricity in Kyrgyzstan\",\"authors\":\"Akylai Muktarbek kyzy ,&nbsp;Frode Alfnes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114629\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study examines the effects of the increasing block tariffs on residential electricity consumption introduced in Kyrgyzstan in January 2015. We use seven years of data from the Kyrgyz Integrated Household Survey and difference-in-differences analysis to show that the policy's effects varied across income groups and geographic locations. Most households are unaffected by the block tariffs' introduction, as their consumption is significantly below the 700 kWh per month threshold. Households with higher incomes and those in colder regions were impacted more by the policy than their lower-income and warmer-region counterparts. Furthermore, there was a noticeable increase in energy-stacking behaviors, with households utilizing coal, wood, and dung during the heating season. This increase was evident among households already using these alternative energy sources (intensive margin) and new adopters (extensive margin). The long-term effect of the block tariffs on energy stacking proved to be more pronounced than the short-term effects. These findings give insight into energy consumption under increasing block tariffs for residential electricity in a lower-middle-income country in Central Asia. They emphasize the need to consider variations in regional climates and the effect of energy stacking when designing energy policies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Policy\",\"volume\":\"203 \",\"pages\":\"Article 114629\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525001363\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525001363","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了2015年1月吉尔吉斯斯坦引入的不断提高的整体电价对居民用电的影响。我们使用吉尔吉斯斯坦综合家庭调查的7年数据和差异中差异分析来显示该政策的影响在不同的收入群体和地理位置有所不同。大多数家庭不受整体电价引入的影响,因为他们的用电量远远低于每月700千瓦时的门槛。与低收入和温暖地区的家庭相比,高收入和寒冷地区的家庭受到该政策的影响更大。此外,能源堆积行为显著增加,家庭在采暖季节利用煤、木材和粪便。这种增长在已经使用这些替代能源的家庭(密集边际)和新采用者(广泛边际)中很明显。事实证明,大宗关税对能源堆积的长期影响比短期影响更为显著。这些发现有助于深入了解中亚一个中低收入国家在不断提高的居民用电整体关税下的能源消耗情况。他们强调,在制定能源政策时,需要考虑区域气候的变化和能源叠加的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Household energy responses to the introduction of increasing block tariffs on residential electricity in Kyrgyzstan
This study examines the effects of the increasing block tariffs on residential electricity consumption introduced in Kyrgyzstan in January 2015. We use seven years of data from the Kyrgyz Integrated Household Survey and difference-in-differences analysis to show that the policy's effects varied across income groups and geographic locations. Most households are unaffected by the block tariffs' introduction, as their consumption is significantly below the 700 kWh per month threshold. Households with higher incomes and those in colder regions were impacted more by the policy than their lower-income and warmer-region counterparts. Furthermore, there was a noticeable increase in energy-stacking behaviors, with households utilizing coal, wood, and dung during the heating season. This increase was evident among households already using these alternative energy sources (intensive margin) and new adopters (extensive margin). The long-term effect of the block tariffs on energy stacking proved to be more pronounced than the short-term effects. These findings give insight into energy consumption under increasing block tariffs for residential electricity in a lower-middle-income country in Central Asia. They emphasize the need to consider variations in regional climates and the effect of energy stacking when designing energy policies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Policy
Energy Policy 管理科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
540
审稿时长
7.9 months
期刊介绍: Energy policy is the manner in which a given entity (often governmental) has decided to address issues of energy development including energy conversion, distribution and use as well as reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in order to contribute to climate change mitigation. The attributes of energy policy may include legislation, international treaties, incentives to investment, guidelines for energy conservation, taxation and other public policy techniques. Energy policy is closely related to climate change policy because totalled worldwide the energy sector emits more greenhouse gas than other sectors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信