Jason A. Galvis , Muhammed Y. Satici , Abagael L. Sykes , Kathleen C. O’Hara , Lisa Rochette , David Roberts , Gustavo Machado
{"title":"估计美国一次模拟非洲猪瘟暴发的抽样和实验室能力","authors":"Jason A. Galvis , Muhammed Y. Satici , Abagael L. Sykes , Kathleen C. O’Hara , Lisa Rochette , David Roberts , Gustavo Machado","doi":"10.1016/j.prevetmed.2025.106529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The introduction of African swine fever virus (ASFV) into uninfected countries can impact economic and animal welfare. Rapid detection and control of the outbreak contribute to successful eradication and promote business continuity. We developed a model to determine the number of samples, sample collectors, laboratory capacity, and processing times following an ASFV introduction into the U.S. We simulated the spread of ASFV in one densely populated swine state, generating a median of 27 (range = 1–68) outbreaks in 150 days, resulting 616 (range = 1–15,011) sampling events with a total of 3068 (range = 7–69,118) barns sampled. We calculated the total sample collectors needed, considering daily working hours, sampling and driving time, and laboratory capabilities with and without blood sample pooling. Samples included 31 blood samples and five oral fluid samples per barn, which equal 84,830 (range = 52–2066,831) and 14,195 (range = 10–345,590) blood and oral fluid samples, respectively. The median number of sample collectors needed to prevent sampling delay varied from 136 to 367 and, in the worst epidemic scenarios, from 833 to 3115. Notably, excluding downtime–which prevented the sampler from visiting additional farms for 24 or 72 h–reduced the number of sample collectors needed between 28 % and 75 %, while switching from blood to oral fluid samples reduced this number between 47 % and 75 %. At a laboratory processing daily capacity of 1000 samples, the median days for sample processing without pooling were 92 days, with a maximum of 5.7 years. We demonstrated a need to redistribute 10,062 (range = 2–67,940) unprocessed samples daily to other laboratories to prevent processing delays. Our study addresses the challenge of efficiently organizing resources for managing a potential ASFV outbreak, providing information about the number of sample collectors and laboratory capacity needed for one densely populated swine region in the U.S.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20413,"journal":{"name":"Preventive veterinary medicine","volume":"239 ","pages":"Article 106529"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating sampling and laboratory capacity for a simulated African swine fever outbreak in the United States\",\"authors\":\"Jason A. Galvis , Muhammed Y. Satici , Abagael L. Sykes , Kathleen C. O’Hara , Lisa Rochette , David Roberts , Gustavo Machado\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prevetmed.2025.106529\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The introduction of African swine fever virus (ASFV) into uninfected countries can impact economic and animal welfare. Rapid detection and control of the outbreak contribute to successful eradication and promote business continuity. We developed a model to determine the number of samples, sample collectors, laboratory capacity, and processing times following an ASFV introduction into the U.S. We simulated the spread of ASFV in one densely populated swine state, generating a median of 27 (range = 1–68) outbreaks in 150 days, resulting 616 (range = 1–15,011) sampling events with a total of 3068 (range = 7–69,118) barns sampled. We calculated the total sample collectors needed, considering daily working hours, sampling and driving time, and laboratory capabilities with and without blood sample pooling. Samples included 31 blood samples and five oral fluid samples per barn, which equal 84,830 (range = 52–2066,831) and 14,195 (range = 10–345,590) blood and oral fluid samples, respectively. The median number of sample collectors needed to prevent sampling delay varied from 136 to 367 and, in the worst epidemic scenarios, from 833 to 3115. Notably, excluding downtime–which prevented the sampler from visiting additional farms for 24 or 72 h–reduced the number of sample collectors needed between 28 % and 75 %, while switching from blood to oral fluid samples reduced this number between 47 % and 75 %. At a laboratory processing daily capacity of 1000 samples, the median days for sample processing without pooling were 92 days, with a maximum of 5.7 years. We demonstrated a need to redistribute 10,062 (range = 2–67,940) unprocessed samples daily to other laboratories to prevent processing delays. Our study addresses the challenge of efficiently organizing resources for managing a potential ASFV outbreak, providing information about the number of sample collectors and laboratory capacity needed for one densely populated swine region in the U.S.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Preventive veterinary medicine\",\"volume\":\"239 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106529\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Preventive veterinary medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016758772500114X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive veterinary medicine","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016758772500114X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Estimating sampling and laboratory capacity for a simulated African swine fever outbreak in the United States
The introduction of African swine fever virus (ASFV) into uninfected countries can impact economic and animal welfare. Rapid detection and control of the outbreak contribute to successful eradication and promote business continuity. We developed a model to determine the number of samples, sample collectors, laboratory capacity, and processing times following an ASFV introduction into the U.S. We simulated the spread of ASFV in one densely populated swine state, generating a median of 27 (range = 1–68) outbreaks in 150 days, resulting 616 (range = 1–15,011) sampling events with a total of 3068 (range = 7–69,118) barns sampled. We calculated the total sample collectors needed, considering daily working hours, sampling and driving time, and laboratory capabilities with and without blood sample pooling. Samples included 31 blood samples and five oral fluid samples per barn, which equal 84,830 (range = 52–2066,831) and 14,195 (range = 10–345,590) blood and oral fluid samples, respectively. The median number of sample collectors needed to prevent sampling delay varied from 136 to 367 and, in the worst epidemic scenarios, from 833 to 3115. Notably, excluding downtime–which prevented the sampler from visiting additional farms for 24 or 72 h–reduced the number of sample collectors needed between 28 % and 75 %, while switching from blood to oral fluid samples reduced this number between 47 % and 75 %. At a laboratory processing daily capacity of 1000 samples, the median days for sample processing without pooling were 92 days, with a maximum of 5.7 years. We demonstrated a need to redistribute 10,062 (range = 2–67,940) unprocessed samples daily to other laboratories to prevent processing delays. Our study addresses the challenge of efficiently organizing resources for managing a potential ASFV outbreak, providing information about the number of sample collectors and laboratory capacity needed for one densely populated swine region in the U.S.
期刊介绍:
Preventive Veterinary Medicine is one of the leading international resources for scientific reports on animal health programs and preventive veterinary medicine. The journal follows the guidelines for standardizing and strengthening the reporting of biomedical research which are available from the CONSORT, MOOSE, PRISMA, REFLECT, STARD, and STROBE statements. The journal focuses on:
Epidemiology of health events relevant to domestic and wild animals;
Economic impacts of epidemic and endemic animal and zoonotic diseases;
Latest methods and approaches in veterinary epidemiology;
Disease and infection control or eradication measures;
The "One Health" concept and the relationships between veterinary medicine, human health, animal-production systems, and the environment;
Development of new techniques in surveillance systems and diagnosis;
Evaluation and control of diseases in animal populations.