从第一性原理看锂-锂氧化物界面的原子结构

IF 8.2 2区 材料科学 Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Giovanni Orlandi, Jun Li, Steven D. Kenny and Enrique Martinez*, 
{"title":"从第一性原理看锂-锂氧化物界面的原子结构","authors":"Giovanni Orlandi,&nbsp;Jun Li,&nbsp;Steven D. Kenny and Enrique Martinez*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsami.4c2210610.1021/acsami.4c22106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >While lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) have been largely commercialized as the rechargeable battery of choice, their liquid electrolyte limits the theoretical energy density of the battery and poses serious safety threats. Solid-state lithium batteries (SSLBs) use a solid electrolyte, which can provide much higher energy densities and better safety than LIBs. The adoption of SSLBs is held back by interactions that occur between the electrolyte and anode, such as high resistance to lithium (Li) ion flow and the growth of Li dendrites that lead to short circuits. This paper focuses on understanding the interface between oxide electrolytes and Li metal anodes with the goal of predicting the structure and properties dictated by the interface. By comparing interface energies for different orientations of Li and lithium oxide (Li<sub>2</sub>O), a primary component of the solid electrolyte interphase, the Li<sub>2</sub>O(110) surface was found to be the most energetically favorable. Furthermore, bonding between the metallic Li and the oxygen atoms on the Li<sub>2</sub>O(110) plane was observed to be more impactful on stability than the lattice strain. As a consequence, the lowest energy interface was obtained by introducing FCC Li between Li<sub>2</sub>O and BCC Li.</p>","PeriodicalId":5,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces","volume":"17 14","pages":"21958–21964 21958–21964"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Atomic Structure of the Lithium–Lithium Oxide Interface from First Principles\",\"authors\":\"Giovanni Orlandi,&nbsp;Jun Li,&nbsp;Steven D. Kenny and Enrique Martinez*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acsami.4c2210610.1021/acsami.4c22106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >While lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) have been largely commercialized as the rechargeable battery of choice, their liquid electrolyte limits the theoretical energy density of the battery and poses serious safety threats. Solid-state lithium batteries (SSLBs) use a solid electrolyte, which can provide much higher energy densities and better safety than LIBs. The adoption of SSLBs is held back by interactions that occur between the electrolyte and anode, such as high resistance to lithium (Li) ion flow and the growth of Li dendrites that lead to short circuits. This paper focuses on understanding the interface between oxide electrolytes and Li metal anodes with the goal of predicting the structure and properties dictated by the interface. By comparing interface energies for different orientations of Li and lithium oxide (Li<sub>2</sub>O), a primary component of the solid electrolyte interphase, the Li<sub>2</sub>O(110) surface was found to be the most energetically favorable. Furthermore, bonding between the metallic Li and the oxygen atoms on the Li<sub>2</sub>O(110) plane was observed to be more impactful on stability than the lattice strain. As a consequence, the lowest energy interface was obtained by introducing FCC Li between Li<sub>2</sub>O and BCC Li.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":5,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces\",\"volume\":\"17 14\",\"pages\":\"21958–21964 21958–21964\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsami.4c22106\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsami.4c22106","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然锂离子电池(LIBs)作为可充电电池的首选已经大量商业化,但其液态电解质限制了电池的理论能量密度,并构成严重的安全威胁。固态锂电池(sslb)使用固体电解质,可以提供比锂电池更高的能量密度和更好的安全性。电解质和阳极之间发生的相互作用阻碍了sslb的采用,例如对锂离子流动的高电阻和导致短路的锂枝晶的生长。本文的重点是了解氧化物电解质和锂金属阳极之间的界面,目的是预测界面所决定的结构和性能。通过比较Li和氧化锂(Li2O)不同取向的界面能,Li2O(110)表面是能量最有利的。此外,在Li2O(110)平面上,金属Li和氧原子之间的键合比晶格应变对稳定性的影响更大。因此,在Li2O和BCC Li之间引入FCC Li获得了最低能量界面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Atomic Structure of the Lithium–Lithium Oxide Interface from First Principles

Atomic Structure of the Lithium–Lithium Oxide Interface from First Principles

While lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) have been largely commercialized as the rechargeable battery of choice, their liquid electrolyte limits the theoretical energy density of the battery and poses serious safety threats. Solid-state lithium batteries (SSLBs) use a solid electrolyte, which can provide much higher energy densities and better safety than LIBs. The adoption of SSLBs is held back by interactions that occur between the electrolyte and anode, such as high resistance to lithium (Li) ion flow and the growth of Li dendrites that lead to short circuits. This paper focuses on understanding the interface between oxide electrolytes and Li metal anodes with the goal of predicting the structure and properties dictated by the interface. By comparing interface energies for different orientations of Li and lithium oxide (Li2O), a primary component of the solid electrolyte interphase, the Li2O(110) surface was found to be the most energetically favorable. Furthermore, bonding between the metallic Li and the oxygen atoms on the Li2O(110) plane was observed to be more impactful on stability than the lattice strain. As a consequence, the lowest energy interface was obtained by introducing FCC Li between Li2O and BCC Li.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
6.30%
发文量
4978
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces is a leading interdisciplinary journal that brings together chemists, engineers, physicists, and biologists to explore the development and utilization of newly-discovered materials and interfacial processes for specific applications. Our journal has experienced remarkable growth since its establishment in 2009, both in terms of the number of articles published and the impact of the research showcased. We are proud to foster a truly global community, with the majority of published articles originating from outside the United States, reflecting the rapid growth of applied research worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信