Giovanni Orlandi, Jun Li, Steven D. Kenny and Enrique Martinez*,
{"title":"从第一性原理看锂-锂氧化物界面的原子结构","authors":"Giovanni Orlandi, Jun Li, Steven D. Kenny and Enrique Martinez*, ","doi":"10.1021/acsami.4c2210610.1021/acsami.4c22106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >While lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) have been largely commercialized as the rechargeable battery of choice, their liquid electrolyte limits the theoretical energy density of the battery and poses serious safety threats. Solid-state lithium batteries (SSLBs) use a solid electrolyte, which can provide much higher energy densities and better safety than LIBs. The adoption of SSLBs is held back by interactions that occur between the electrolyte and anode, such as high resistance to lithium (Li) ion flow and the growth of Li dendrites that lead to short circuits. This paper focuses on understanding the interface between oxide electrolytes and Li metal anodes with the goal of predicting the structure and properties dictated by the interface. By comparing interface energies for different orientations of Li and lithium oxide (Li<sub>2</sub>O), a primary component of the solid electrolyte interphase, the Li<sub>2</sub>O(110) surface was found to be the most energetically favorable. Furthermore, bonding between the metallic Li and the oxygen atoms on the Li<sub>2</sub>O(110) plane was observed to be more impactful on stability than the lattice strain. As a consequence, the lowest energy interface was obtained by introducing FCC Li between Li<sub>2</sub>O and BCC Li.</p>","PeriodicalId":5,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces","volume":"17 14","pages":"21958–21964 21958–21964"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Atomic Structure of the Lithium–Lithium Oxide Interface from First Principles\",\"authors\":\"Giovanni Orlandi, Jun Li, Steven D. Kenny and Enrique Martinez*, \",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acsami.4c2210610.1021/acsami.4c22106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >While lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) have been largely commercialized as the rechargeable battery of choice, their liquid electrolyte limits the theoretical energy density of the battery and poses serious safety threats. Solid-state lithium batteries (SSLBs) use a solid electrolyte, which can provide much higher energy densities and better safety than LIBs. The adoption of SSLBs is held back by interactions that occur between the electrolyte and anode, such as high resistance to lithium (Li) ion flow and the growth of Li dendrites that lead to short circuits. This paper focuses on understanding the interface between oxide electrolytes and Li metal anodes with the goal of predicting the structure and properties dictated by the interface. By comparing interface energies for different orientations of Li and lithium oxide (Li<sub>2</sub>O), a primary component of the solid electrolyte interphase, the Li<sub>2</sub>O(110) surface was found to be the most energetically favorable. Furthermore, bonding between the metallic Li and the oxygen atoms on the Li<sub>2</sub>O(110) plane was observed to be more impactful on stability than the lattice strain. As a consequence, the lowest energy interface was obtained by introducing FCC Li between Li<sub>2</sub>O and BCC Li.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":5,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces\",\"volume\":\"17 14\",\"pages\":\"21958–21964 21958–21964\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsami.4c22106\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsami.4c22106","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Atomic Structure of the Lithium–Lithium Oxide Interface from First Principles
While lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) have been largely commercialized as the rechargeable battery of choice, their liquid electrolyte limits the theoretical energy density of the battery and poses serious safety threats. Solid-state lithium batteries (SSLBs) use a solid electrolyte, which can provide much higher energy densities and better safety than LIBs. The adoption of SSLBs is held back by interactions that occur between the electrolyte and anode, such as high resistance to lithium (Li) ion flow and the growth of Li dendrites that lead to short circuits. This paper focuses on understanding the interface between oxide electrolytes and Li metal anodes with the goal of predicting the structure and properties dictated by the interface. By comparing interface energies for different orientations of Li and lithium oxide (Li2O), a primary component of the solid electrolyte interphase, the Li2O(110) surface was found to be the most energetically favorable. Furthermore, bonding between the metallic Li and the oxygen atoms on the Li2O(110) plane was observed to be more impactful on stability than the lattice strain. As a consequence, the lowest energy interface was obtained by introducing FCC Li between Li2O and BCC Li.
期刊介绍:
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces is a leading interdisciplinary journal that brings together chemists, engineers, physicists, and biologists to explore the development and utilization of newly-discovered materials and interfacial processes for specific applications. Our journal has experienced remarkable growth since its establishment in 2009, both in terms of the number of articles published and the impact of the research showcased. We are proud to foster a truly global community, with the majority of published articles originating from outside the United States, reflecting the rapid growth of applied research worldwide.