腹腔镜全子宫切除术中改良一级重建和加固预防术后盆腔器官脱垂的随机临床试验

Xiangru Chen, Hongbo Gao
{"title":"腹腔镜全子宫切除术中改良一级重建和加固预防术后盆腔器官脱垂的随机临床试验","authors":"Xiangru Chen, Hongbo Gao","doi":"10.4314/ahs.v24i4.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This paper investigated that the clinical value of modified first-level reconstruction reinforcement in the prevention and treatment of pelvic floor dysfunction after laparoscopic total hysterectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 360 patients undergoing laparoscopic total hysterectomy from December 2018 to September 2021 were selected and divided into three groups (A, B, C) according to POP-Q criteria: This is a randomized clinical trial in which women with first- and second-degree pelvic organ prolapse, and women without pelvic organ prolapse were each randomized into 3 arms of the study. According to the informed consent of patients, three groups are as following: Arm 1: 60 cases in the non-suspension group (vaginal stump was only sutured continuous absorbable suture); Arm 2: 60 cases in traditional suspension group (as in Arm 1, plus suspension of vaginal stump with non-absorbable sutures to cardinal and round ligaments); Arm 3: 60 cases in the modified suspension group (vaginal stump reinforced with horizontal reconstruction). POP-Q score, sexual life quality questionnaire, urinary incontinence questionnaire and pelvic floor ultrasound were compared before and at 6 and 12 months after operation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>(1) in the non-prolapse group and the prolapse group, the POP-Q score of the modified suspension group c was superior to that of the non-suspension group and the traditional suspension group b at 6 and 12 months after surgery (P < 0.05), and the postoperative POP-Q score of the prolapse group was significantly improved compared with that before surgery. (2) In both the non-prolapse and the prolapse study groups, the participants that were randomized to the modified suspension treatment (arm 3) had significantly better sexual function scores than those in arm 1 and arm 2 six and twelve months after surgery (p <0.05). (3) Similarly, participants in both the non-prolapse and the prolapse groups that were randomized to the modified suspension treatment arm (arm 3) were significantly less prone to. urinary incontinence than those randomized to arm 1 and arm 2 at 6 and 12 months after surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with traditional vaginal stump suture and traditional vaginal stump suspension, the modified first-level reconstruction and consolidation method can effectively prevent and cure pelvic floor dysfunction after laparoscopic total hysterectomy, and significantly improve the quality of life of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94295,"journal":{"name":"African health sciences","volume":"24 4","pages":"111-119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11970144/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modified first-level reconstruction and reinforcement during laparoscopic total hysterectomy for prevention of post-operative pelvic organ prolapse: a randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Xiangru Chen, Hongbo Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/ahs.v24i4.15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This paper investigated that the clinical value of modified first-level reconstruction reinforcement in the prevention and treatment of pelvic floor dysfunction after laparoscopic total hysterectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 360 patients undergoing laparoscopic total hysterectomy from December 2018 to September 2021 were selected and divided into three groups (A, B, C) according to POP-Q criteria: This is a randomized clinical trial in which women with first- and second-degree pelvic organ prolapse, and women without pelvic organ prolapse were each randomized into 3 arms of the study. According to the informed consent of patients, three groups are as following: Arm 1: 60 cases in the non-suspension group (vaginal stump was only sutured continuous absorbable suture); Arm 2: 60 cases in traditional suspension group (as in Arm 1, plus suspension of vaginal stump with non-absorbable sutures to cardinal and round ligaments); Arm 3: 60 cases in the modified suspension group (vaginal stump reinforced with horizontal reconstruction). POP-Q score, sexual life quality questionnaire, urinary incontinence questionnaire and pelvic floor ultrasound were compared before and at 6 and 12 months after operation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>(1) in the non-prolapse group and the prolapse group, the POP-Q score of the modified suspension group c was superior to that of the non-suspension group and the traditional suspension group b at 6 and 12 months after surgery (P < 0.05), and the postoperative POP-Q score of the prolapse group was significantly improved compared with that before surgery. (2) In both the non-prolapse and the prolapse study groups, the participants that were randomized to the modified suspension treatment (arm 3) had significantly better sexual function scores than those in arm 1 and arm 2 six and twelve months after surgery (p <0.05). (3) Similarly, participants in both the non-prolapse and the prolapse groups that were randomized to the modified suspension treatment arm (arm 3) were significantly less prone to. urinary incontinence than those randomized to arm 1 and arm 2 at 6 and 12 months after surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with traditional vaginal stump suture and traditional vaginal stump suspension, the modified first-level reconstruction and consolidation method can effectively prevent and cure pelvic floor dysfunction after laparoscopic total hysterectomy, and significantly improve the quality of life of patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African health sciences\",\"volume\":\"24 4\",\"pages\":\"111-119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11970144/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African health sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v24i4.15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v24i4.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨改良一级重建加固在预防和治疗腹腔镜全子宫切除术后盆底功能障碍中的临床价值。方法:选择2018年12月至2021年9月行腹腔镜全子宫切除术的患者360例,按照POP-Q标准分为A、B、C三组:这是一项随机临床试验,将有一、二度盆腔器官脱垂的女性和无盆腔器官脱垂的女性随机分为3组。根据患者知情同意分为三组:第1组:非悬吊组60例(阴道残端仅缝合连续可吸收缝线);第2组:传统悬吊组60例(与第1组相同,阴道残端悬吊,胫韧带和圆韧带不可吸收缝合线);第三组:改良悬吊组(阴道残端水平重建加固)60例。比较两组患者术前、术后6个月、12个月的POP-Q评分、性生活质量问卷、尿失禁问卷及盆底超声检查结果。结果:(1)在非脱垂组和脱垂组中,改良悬吊c组术后6个月和12个月的POP-Q评分均优于非悬吊组和传统悬吊b组(P < 0.05),脱垂组术后POP-Q评分较术前显著提高。(2)在非脱垂组和脱垂组中,随机分配到改良悬吊治疗组(3组)的参与者在术后6个月和12个月的性功能评分明显高于1组和2组(p)。与传统阴道残端缝合和传统阴道残端悬吊相比,改进的一级重建巩固方法能有效预防和治疗腹腔镜全子宫切除术后盆底功能障碍,显著提高患者的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modified first-level reconstruction and reinforcement during laparoscopic total hysterectomy for prevention of post-operative pelvic organ prolapse: a randomized clinical trial.

Objective: This paper investigated that the clinical value of modified first-level reconstruction reinforcement in the prevention and treatment of pelvic floor dysfunction after laparoscopic total hysterectomy.

Methods: A total of 360 patients undergoing laparoscopic total hysterectomy from December 2018 to September 2021 were selected and divided into three groups (A, B, C) according to POP-Q criteria: This is a randomized clinical trial in which women with first- and second-degree pelvic organ prolapse, and women without pelvic organ prolapse were each randomized into 3 arms of the study. According to the informed consent of patients, three groups are as following: Arm 1: 60 cases in the non-suspension group (vaginal stump was only sutured continuous absorbable suture); Arm 2: 60 cases in traditional suspension group (as in Arm 1, plus suspension of vaginal stump with non-absorbable sutures to cardinal and round ligaments); Arm 3: 60 cases in the modified suspension group (vaginal stump reinforced with horizontal reconstruction). POP-Q score, sexual life quality questionnaire, urinary incontinence questionnaire and pelvic floor ultrasound were compared before and at 6 and 12 months after operation.

Results: (1) in the non-prolapse group and the prolapse group, the POP-Q score of the modified suspension group c was superior to that of the non-suspension group and the traditional suspension group b at 6 and 12 months after surgery (P < 0.05), and the postoperative POP-Q score of the prolapse group was significantly improved compared with that before surgery. (2) In both the non-prolapse and the prolapse study groups, the participants that were randomized to the modified suspension treatment (arm 3) had significantly better sexual function scores than those in arm 1 and arm 2 six and twelve months after surgery (p <0.05). (3) Similarly, participants in both the non-prolapse and the prolapse groups that were randomized to the modified suspension treatment arm (arm 3) were significantly less prone to. urinary incontinence than those randomized to arm 1 and arm 2 at 6 and 12 months after surgery.

Conclusions: Compared with traditional vaginal stump suture and traditional vaginal stump suspension, the modified first-level reconstruction and consolidation method can effectively prevent and cure pelvic floor dysfunction after laparoscopic total hysterectomy, and significantly improve the quality of life of patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信