Feriel El Kara, Yassine Mokni, Sarra Ouertani, Emna Amira, Sonia Sebai, Kaouther Zribi
{"title":"使用 FMEA 方法对危险药品的控制电路进行风险分析。","authors":"Feriel El Kara, Yassine Mokni, Sarra Ouertani, Emna Amira, Sonia Sebai, Kaouther Zribi","doi":"10.4212/cjhp.3631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Risk management is one aspect of improving the quality and safety of medication care.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To map the process of monitoring hazardous drugs, assess the risks of the monitoring cycle and identify corrective actions to be implemented to ensure the safety of the cycle within a drug monitoring laboratory.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An analytical study was conducted over a period of 6 months in Tunisia's national drug monitoring laboratory. The risk analysis was carried out using the failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 53 failure modes and 3 critical levels were detected using the Ishikawa diagram and the 5M method (equipment environment, methods, materials, workforce). Thirty-three of the failure modes were of major criticality, 14 of moderate criticality and 6 of minor criticality. Overall, hazardous drug monitoring was found to be a high criticality (C<sub>avg</sub>: 31.9) process, which required the implementation of an effective action plan in order to reduce the level of criticality to minor (C<sub>avg</sub>: 10.4).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The hazardous drug monitoring process was complex and was associated with a high level of risk. After analyzing possible causes and pre-existing obstacles, an action plan was developed. Monitoring the elements of the action plan remains essential to controlling this process. A specialized department may be considered in the event of an increase in activity, for example with the surge of innovative therapies that require more restrictions during handling.</p>","PeriodicalId":94225,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy","volume":"78 2","pages":"e3631"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11970261/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyse des risques, par la méthode AMDEC, du circuit de contrôle des médicaments dangereux.\",\"authors\":\"Feriel El Kara, Yassine Mokni, Sarra Ouertani, Emna Amira, Sonia Sebai, Kaouther Zribi\",\"doi\":\"10.4212/cjhp.3631\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Risk management is one aspect of improving the quality and safety of medication care.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To map the process of monitoring hazardous drugs, assess the risks of the monitoring cycle and identify corrective actions to be implemented to ensure the safety of the cycle within a drug monitoring laboratory.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An analytical study was conducted over a period of 6 months in Tunisia's national drug monitoring laboratory. The risk analysis was carried out using the failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 53 failure modes and 3 critical levels were detected using the Ishikawa diagram and the 5M method (equipment environment, methods, materials, workforce). Thirty-three of the failure modes were of major criticality, 14 of moderate criticality and 6 of minor criticality. Overall, hazardous drug monitoring was found to be a high criticality (C<sub>avg</sub>: 31.9) process, which required the implementation of an effective action plan in order to reduce the level of criticality to minor (C<sub>avg</sub>: 10.4).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The hazardous drug monitoring process was complex and was associated with a high level of risk. After analyzing possible causes and pre-existing obstacles, an action plan was developed. Monitoring the elements of the action plan remains essential to controlling this process. A specialized department may be considered in the event of an increase in activity, for example with the surge of innovative therapies that require more restrictions during handling.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"78 2\",\"pages\":\"e3631\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11970261/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.3631\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.3631","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Analyse des risques, par la méthode AMDEC, du circuit de contrôle des médicaments dangereux.
Background: Risk management is one aspect of improving the quality and safety of medication care.
Objectives: To map the process of monitoring hazardous drugs, assess the risks of the monitoring cycle and identify corrective actions to be implemented to ensure the safety of the cycle within a drug monitoring laboratory.
Methods: An analytical study was conducted over a period of 6 months in Tunisia's national drug monitoring laboratory. The risk analysis was carried out using the failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) method.
Results: A total of 53 failure modes and 3 critical levels were detected using the Ishikawa diagram and the 5M method (equipment environment, methods, materials, workforce). Thirty-three of the failure modes were of major criticality, 14 of moderate criticality and 6 of minor criticality. Overall, hazardous drug monitoring was found to be a high criticality (Cavg: 31.9) process, which required the implementation of an effective action plan in order to reduce the level of criticality to minor (Cavg: 10.4).
Conclusion: The hazardous drug monitoring process was complex and was associated with a high level of risk. After analyzing possible causes and pre-existing obstacles, an action plan was developed. Monitoring the elements of the action plan remains essential to controlling this process. A specialized department may be considered in the event of an increase in activity, for example with the surge of innovative therapies that require more restrictions during handling.