使用 FMEA 方法对危险药品的控制电路进行风险分析。

The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-04-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4212/cjhp.3631
Feriel El Kara, Yassine Mokni, Sarra Ouertani, Emna Amira, Sonia Sebai, Kaouther Zribi
{"title":"使用 FMEA 方法对危险药品的控制电路进行风险分析。","authors":"Feriel El Kara, Yassine Mokni, Sarra Ouertani, Emna Amira, Sonia Sebai, Kaouther Zribi","doi":"10.4212/cjhp.3631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Risk management is one aspect of improving the quality and safety of medication care.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To map the process of monitoring hazardous drugs, assess the risks of the monitoring cycle and identify corrective actions to be implemented to ensure the safety of the cycle within a drug monitoring laboratory.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An analytical study was conducted over a period of 6 months in Tunisia's national drug monitoring laboratory. The risk analysis was carried out using the failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 53 failure modes and 3 critical levels were detected using the Ishikawa diagram and the 5M method (equipment environment, methods, materials, workforce). Thirty-three of the failure modes were of major criticality, 14 of moderate criticality and 6 of minor criticality. Overall, hazardous drug monitoring was found to be a high criticality (C<sub>avg</sub>: 31.9) process, which required the implementation of an effective action plan in order to reduce the level of criticality to minor (C<sub>avg</sub>: 10.4).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The hazardous drug monitoring process was complex and was associated with a high level of risk. After analyzing possible causes and pre-existing obstacles, an action plan was developed. Monitoring the elements of the action plan remains essential to controlling this process. A specialized department may be considered in the event of an increase in activity, for example with the surge of innovative therapies that require more restrictions during handling.</p>","PeriodicalId":94225,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy","volume":"78 2","pages":"e3631"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11970261/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyse des risques, par la méthode AMDEC, du circuit de contrôle des médicaments dangereux.\",\"authors\":\"Feriel El Kara, Yassine Mokni, Sarra Ouertani, Emna Amira, Sonia Sebai, Kaouther Zribi\",\"doi\":\"10.4212/cjhp.3631\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Risk management is one aspect of improving the quality and safety of medication care.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To map the process of monitoring hazardous drugs, assess the risks of the monitoring cycle and identify corrective actions to be implemented to ensure the safety of the cycle within a drug monitoring laboratory.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An analytical study was conducted over a period of 6 months in Tunisia's national drug monitoring laboratory. The risk analysis was carried out using the failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 53 failure modes and 3 critical levels were detected using the Ishikawa diagram and the 5M method (equipment environment, methods, materials, workforce). Thirty-three of the failure modes were of major criticality, 14 of moderate criticality and 6 of minor criticality. Overall, hazardous drug monitoring was found to be a high criticality (C<sub>avg</sub>: 31.9) process, which required the implementation of an effective action plan in order to reduce the level of criticality to minor (C<sub>avg</sub>: 10.4).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The hazardous drug monitoring process was complex and was associated with a high level of risk. After analyzing possible causes and pre-existing obstacles, an action plan was developed. Monitoring the elements of the action plan remains essential to controlling this process. A specialized department may be considered in the event of an increase in activity, for example with the surge of innovative therapies that require more restrictions during handling.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"78 2\",\"pages\":\"e3631\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11970261/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.3631\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.3631","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analyse des risques, par la méthode AMDEC, du circuit de contrôle des médicaments dangereux.

Background: Risk management is one aspect of improving the quality and safety of medication care.

Objectives: To map the process of monitoring hazardous drugs, assess the risks of the monitoring cycle and identify corrective actions to be implemented to ensure the safety of the cycle within a drug monitoring laboratory.

Methods: An analytical study was conducted over a period of 6 months in Tunisia's national drug monitoring laboratory. The risk analysis was carried out using the failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) method.

Results: A total of 53 failure modes and 3 critical levels were detected using the Ishikawa diagram and the 5M method (equipment environment, methods, materials, workforce). Thirty-three of the failure modes were of major criticality, 14 of moderate criticality and 6 of minor criticality. Overall, hazardous drug monitoring was found to be a high criticality (Cavg: 31.9) process, which required the implementation of an effective action plan in order to reduce the level of criticality to minor (Cavg: 10.4).

Conclusion: The hazardous drug monitoring process was complex and was associated with a high level of risk. After analyzing possible causes and pre-existing obstacles, an action plan was developed. Monitoring the elements of the action plan remains essential to controlling this process. A specialized department may be considered in the event of an increase in activity, for example with the surge of innovative therapies that require more restrictions during handling.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信