基于深度卷积神经网络exception和MobileNet-v2的口腔白斑人工智能诊断。

IF 3 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Frontiers in oral health Pub Date : 2025-03-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/froh.2025.1414524
Elakya Ramesh, Anuradha Ganesan, Krithika Chandrasekar Lakshmi, Prabhu Manickam Natarajan
{"title":"基于深度卷积神经网络exception和MobileNet-v2的口腔白斑人工智能诊断。","authors":"Elakya Ramesh, Anuradha Ganesan, Krithika Chandrasekar Lakshmi, Prabhu Manickam Natarajan","doi":"10.3389/froh.2025.1414524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present study aims to employ and compare the artificial intelligence (AI) convolutional neural networks (CNN) Xception and MobileNet-v2 for the diagnosis of Oral leukoplakia (OL) and to differentiate its clinical types from other white lesions of the oral cavity.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Clinical photographs of oral leukoplakia and non-oral leukoplakia lesions were gathered from the SRM Dental College archives. An aggregate of 659 clinical photos, based on convenience sampling were included from the archive in the dataset. Around 202 pictures were of oral leukoplakia while 457 were other white lesions. Lesions considered in the differential diagnosis of oral leukoplakia like frictional keratosis, oral candidiasis, oral lichen planus, lichenoid reactions, mucosal burns, pouch keratosis, and oral carcinoma were included under the other white lesions subset. A total of 261 images constituting the test sample, were arbitrarily selected from the collected dataset, whilst the remaining images served as training and validation datasets. The training dataset were engaged in data augmentation to enhance the quantity and variation. Performance metrics of accuracy, precision, recall, and f1_score were incorporated for the CNN model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CNN models both Xception and MobileNetV2 were able to diagnose OL and other white lesions using photographs. In terms of F1-score and overall accuracy, the MobilenetV2 model performed noticeably better than the other model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We demonstrate that CNN models are capable of 89%-92% accuracy and can be best used to discern OL and its clinical types from other white lesions of the oral cavity.</p>","PeriodicalId":94016,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in oral health","volume":"6 ","pages":"1414524"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11968717/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence-based diagnosis of oral leukoplakia using deep convolutional neural networks Xception and MobileNet-v2.\",\"authors\":\"Elakya Ramesh, Anuradha Ganesan, Krithika Chandrasekar Lakshmi, Prabhu Manickam Natarajan\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/froh.2025.1414524\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present study aims to employ and compare the artificial intelligence (AI) convolutional neural networks (CNN) Xception and MobileNet-v2 for the diagnosis of Oral leukoplakia (OL) and to differentiate its clinical types from other white lesions of the oral cavity.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Clinical photographs of oral leukoplakia and non-oral leukoplakia lesions were gathered from the SRM Dental College archives. An aggregate of 659 clinical photos, based on convenience sampling were included from the archive in the dataset. Around 202 pictures were of oral leukoplakia while 457 were other white lesions. Lesions considered in the differential diagnosis of oral leukoplakia like frictional keratosis, oral candidiasis, oral lichen planus, lichenoid reactions, mucosal burns, pouch keratosis, and oral carcinoma were included under the other white lesions subset. A total of 261 images constituting the test sample, were arbitrarily selected from the collected dataset, whilst the remaining images served as training and validation datasets. The training dataset were engaged in data augmentation to enhance the quantity and variation. Performance metrics of accuracy, precision, recall, and f1_score were incorporated for the CNN model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CNN models both Xception and MobileNetV2 were able to diagnose OL and other white lesions using photographs. In terms of F1-score and overall accuracy, the MobilenetV2 model performed noticeably better than the other model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We demonstrate that CNN models are capable of 89%-92% accuracy and can be best used to discern OL and its clinical types from other white lesions of the oral cavity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in oral health\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"1414524\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11968717/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in oral health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/froh.2025.1414524\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in oral health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/froh.2025.1414524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在应用人工智能(AI)卷积神经网络(CNN) Xception和MobileNet-v2对口腔白斑(OL)的诊断进行比较,并将其与口腔其他白色病变的临床类型进行区分。材料和方法:收集SRM牙科学院档案中口腔白斑和非口腔白斑病变的临床照片。基于方便抽样,从数据集中的存档中共收录了659张临床照片。口腔白斑202张,其他白色病变457张。在口腔白斑鉴别诊断中考虑的病变,如摩擦性角化病、口腔念珠菌病、口腔扁平苔藓、类地衣反应、粘膜烧伤、袋角化病和口腔癌被包括在其他白色病变亚组中。从收集的数据集中任意选择261张图像作为测试样本,其余图像作为训练和验证数据集。对训练数据集进行数据扩充,增强数据量和变异性。准确度、精密度、召回率和f1_score的性能指标被纳入CNN模型。结果:CNN模型Xception和MobileNetV2均能通过照片诊断OL和其他白色病变。在f1得分和总体准确性方面,MobilenetV2模型的表现明显优于其他模型。结论:我们证明CNN模型具有89%-92%的准确率,可以最好地用于从口腔其他白色病变中识别OL及其临床类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial intelligence-based diagnosis of oral leukoplakia using deep convolutional neural networks Xception and MobileNet-v2.

Objective: The present study aims to employ and compare the artificial intelligence (AI) convolutional neural networks (CNN) Xception and MobileNet-v2 for the diagnosis of Oral leukoplakia (OL) and to differentiate its clinical types from other white lesions of the oral cavity.

Materials and methods: Clinical photographs of oral leukoplakia and non-oral leukoplakia lesions were gathered from the SRM Dental College archives. An aggregate of 659 clinical photos, based on convenience sampling were included from the archive in the dataset. Around 202 pictures were of oral leukoplakia while 457 were other white lesions. Lesions considered in the differential diagnosis of oral leukoplakia like frictional keratosis, oral candidiasis, oral lichen planus, lichenoid reactions, mucosal burns, pouch keratosis, and oral carcinoma were included under the other white lesions subset. A total of 261 images constituting the test sample, were arbitrarily selected from the collected dataset, whilst the remaining images served as training and validation datasets. The training dataset were engaged in data augmentation to enhance the quantity and variation. Performance metrics of accuracy, precision, recall, and f1_score were incorporated for the CNN model.

Results: CNN models both Xception and MobileNetV2 were able to diagnose OL and other white lesions using photographs. In terms of F1-score and overall accuracy, the MobilenetV2 model performed noticeably better than the other model.

Conclusion: We demonstrate that CNN models are capable of 89%-92% accuracy and can be best used to discern OL and its clinical types from other white lesions of the oral cavity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信