在接受多动症评估的成人样本中交叉验证 MMPI 多动症拟态量表。

IF 3 3区 心理学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Taylor D Lambertus, Julie Suhr, Adrienne Jankowski
{"title":"在接受多动症评估的成人样本中交叉验证 MMPI 多动症拟态量表。","authors":"Taylor D Lambertus, Julie Suhr, Adrienne Jankowski","doi":"10.1080/13854046.2025.2486303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> There are few attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)-specific symptom validity tests (SVTs) available. The revised Dissimulation ADHD scale (Ds-ADHD-r) was developed to identify noncredible reporting on the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI). The current study examines whether the Ds-ADHD-r can identify noncredible performance and reporting in a clinical sample. <b>Method</b>: Participants (<i>N</i> = 113) completed neuropsychological evaluations in an university clinic, including the Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scale (CAARS), MMPI-2-RF or MMPI-3, at least one standalone performance validity test (PVT), and at least four embedded PVTs. Noncredible groups were created based on falling above or below the cutoff on at least one PVT or falling above or below the cutoff on one SVT. <b>Results:</b> Those who scored above the SVT cutoffs scored higher on both the RBS and the Ds-ADHD-r compared to those who scored below the SVT cutoffs, while PVT performance groups did not differ on either the RBS or Ds-ADHD-r. The Ds-ADHD-r demonstrated greater utility in identifying symptom overreporting when compared to the MMPI RBS. The Ds-ADHD-r did not show utility in detecting noncredible performance. In correlation analyses, the Ds-ADHD-r was more strongly correlated to MMPI F and <i>F</i> scales as compared to FBS and RBS. <b>Conclusions</b>: Results support the utility of the Ds-ADHD-r to detect symptom overreporting in adults seeking evaluation for ADHD, though validation in additional, more diverse samples are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":55250,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-validation of the MMPI dissimulation ADHD scale in a sample of adults presenting for ADHD evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Taylor D Lambertus, Julie Suhr, Adrienne Jankowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13854046.2025.2486303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> There are few attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)-specific symptom validity tests (SVTs) available. The revised Dissimulation ADHD scale (Ds-ADHD-r) was developed to identify noncredible reporting on the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI). The current study examines whether the Ds-ADHD-r can identify noncredible performance and reporting in a clinical sample. <b>Method</b>: Participants (<i>N</i> = 113) completed neuropsychological evaluations in an university clinic, including the Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scale (CAARS), MMPI-2-RF or MMPI-3, at least one standalone performance validity test (PVT), and at least four embedded PVTs. Noncredible groups were created based on falling above or below the cutoff on at least one PVT or falling above or below the cutoff on one SVT. <b>Results:</b> Those who scored above the SVT cutoffs scored higher on both the RBS and the Ds-ADHD-r compared to those who scored below the SVT cutoffs, while PVT performance groups did not differ on either the RBS or Ds-ADHD-r. The Ds-ADHD-r demonstrated greater utility in identifying symptom overreporting when compared to the MMPI RBS. The Ds-ADHD-r did not show utility in detecting noncredible performance. In correlation analyses, the Ds-ADHD-r was more strongly correlated to MMPI F and <i>F</i> scales as compared to FBS and RBS. <b>Conclusions</b>: Results support the utility of the Ds-ADHD-r to detect symptom overreporting in adults seeking evaluation for ADHD, though validation in additional, more diverse samples are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neuropsychologist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neuropsychologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2025.2486303\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2025.2486303","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cross-validation of the MMPI dissimulation ADHD scale in a sample of adults presenting for ADHD evaluation.

Objective: There are few attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)-specific symptom validity tests (SVTs) available. The revised Dissimulation ADHD scale (Ds-ADHD-r) was developed to identify noncredible reporting on the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI). The current study examines whether the Ds-ADHD-r can identify noncredible performance and reporting in a clinical sample. Method: Participants (N = 113) completed neuropsychological evaluations in an university clinic, including the Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scale (CAARS), MMPI-2-RF or MMPI-3, at least one standalone performance validity test (PVT), and at least four embedded PVTs. Noncredible groups were created based on falling above or below the cutoff on at least one PVT or falling above or below the cutoff on one SVT. Results: Those who scored above the SVT cutoffs scored higher on both the RBS and the Ds-ADHD-r compared to those who scored below the SVT cutoffs, while PVT performance groups did not differ on either the RBS or Ds-ADHD-r. The Ds-ADHD-r demonstrated greater utility in identifying symptom overreporting when compared to the MMPI RBS. The Ds-ADHD-r did not show utility in detecting noncredible performance. In correlation analyses, the Ds-ADHD-r was more strongly correlated to MMPI F and F scales as compared to FBS and RBS. Conclusions: Results support the utility of the Ds-ADHD-r to detect symptom overreporting in adults seeking evaluation for ADHD, though validation in additional, more diverse samples are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neuropsychologist
Clinical Neuropsychologist 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
12.80%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Clinical Neuropsychologist (TCN) serves as the premier forum for (1) state-of-the-art clinically-relevant scientific research, (2) in-depth professional discussions of matters germane to evidence-based practice, and (3) clinical case studies in neuropsychology. Of particular interest are papers that can make definitive statements about a given topic (thereby having implications for the standards of clinical practice) and those with the potential to expand today’s clinical frontiers. Research on all age groups, and on both clinical and normal populations, is considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信