超声引导下肉毒杆菌注射治疗肢体痉挛与肌张力障碍的疗效比较。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Israel Medical Association Journal Pub Date : 2025-04-01
Gilad Yahalom, Mikhal E Cohen, Ilana Israel, Roni Eichel, Yosef Shechter
{"title":"超声引导下肉毒杆菌注射治疗肢体痉挛与肌张力障碍的疗效比较。","authors":"Gilad Yahalom, Mikhal E Cohen, Ilana Israel, Roni Eichel, Yosef Shechter","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Botulinum toxin (BT) can alleviate limb dystonia, but limited insurance coverage hinders its utilization.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the therapeutic efficacy of BT injections for spasticity and dystonia of the limbs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>BT injections of hypertonic limbs were administered under ultrasound guidance between 2019 and 2024 for either limb dystonia or limb spasticity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 74 patients included, 57 were diagnosed with spasticity and 17 with dystonia. In total, 276 therapeutic cycles were administered. The dropout rates were 45.6% in the spasticity group and 41.2% in the dystonia group (P = 0.48). There was no significant difference in subjective motor improvement between dystonia and spasticity (P = 0.16). Dystonia patients reported significantly better pain relief (98.5 ± 4.9% vs. 72.4 ± 35.6% respectively, P < 0.001). Notably, 74.3% of dystonia treatments reported moderate or marked improvement, whereas only 54.0% of spasticity treatments did (P > 0.05), based on patient the global impression of change (PGI-C) scale. Side effects were infrequent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BT injections for limb spasticity and dystonia are partially effective. Nonetheless, the dropout rate is high. While BT injections are more effective in relieving pain for dystonia compared to spasticity, disease severity gradually improves over time in treated patients with spasticity but not with dystonia.</p>","PeriodicalId":50268,"journal":{"name":"Israel Medical Association Journal","volume":"27 4","pages":"238-243"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison in Therapeutic Outcome of Ultrasound-guided Botulinum Injections for Limb Spasticity Versus Dystonia.\",\"authors\":\"Gilad Yahalom, Mikhal E Cohen, Ilana Israel, Roni Eichel, Yosef Shechter\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Botulinum toxin (BT) can alleviate limb dystonia, but limited insurance coverage hinders its utilization.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the therapeutic efficacy of BT injections for spasticity and dystonia of the limbs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>BT injections of hypertonic limbs were administered under ultrasound guidance between 2019 and 2024 for either limb dystonia or limb spasticity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 74 patients included, 57 were diagnosed with spasticity and 17 with dystonia. In total, 276 therapeutic cycles were administered. The dropout rates were 45.6% in the spasticity group and 41.2% in the dystonia group (P = 0.48). There was no significant difference in subjective motor improvement between dystonia and spasticity (P = 0.16). Dystonia patients reported significantly better pain relief (98.5 ± 4.9% vs. 72.4 ± 35.6% respectively, P < 0.001). Notably, 74.3% of dystonia treatments reported moderate or marked improvement, whereas only 54.0% of spasticity treatments did (P > 0.05), based on patient the global impression of change (PGI-C) scale. Side effects were infrequent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BT injections for limb spasticity and dystonia are partially effective. Nonetheless, the dropout rate is high. While BT injections are more effective in relieving pain for dystonia compared to spasticity, disease severity gradually improves over time in treated patients with spasticity but not with dystonia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Israel Medical Association Journal\",\"volume\":\"27 4\",\"pages\":\"238-243\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Israel Medical Association Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Israel Medical Association Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肉毒杆菌毒素(BT)可以缓解肢体肌张力障碍,但有限的保险范围阻碍了其应用。目的:比较BT注射治疗四肢痉挛和肌张力障碍的疗效。方法:2019 ~ 2024年在超声引导下对高渗肢体进行BT注射,治疗肢体肌张力障碍或肢体痉挛。结果:74例患者中,57例诊断为痉挛,17例诊断为肌张力障碍。总共进行了276个治疗周期。痉挛组和肌张力障碍组辍学率分别为45.6%和41.2% (P = 0.48)。肌张力障碍与痉挛患者主观运动改善无显著差异(P = 0.16)。肌张力障碍患者的疼痛缓解明显更好(分别为98.5±4.9%和72.4±35.6%,P < 0.001)。值得注意的是,根据患者整体印象变化(PGI-C)量表,74.3%的肌张力障碍治疗报告中度或显著改善,而痉挛治疗只有54.0% (P > 0.05)。副作用很少。结论:BT注射治疗肢体痉挛和肌张力障碍有部分疗效。尽管如此,辍学率还是很高。虽然与痉挛相比,BT注射在缓解肌张力障碍疼痛方面更有效,但痉挛而非肌张力障碍患者的疾病严重程度随着时间的推移逐渐改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison in Therapeutic Outcome of Ultrasound-guided Botulinum Injections for Limb Spasticity Versus Dystonia.

Background: Botulinum toxin (BT) can alleviate limb dystonia, but limited insurance coverage hinders its utilization.

Objectives: To compare the therapeutic efficacy of BT injections for spasticity and dystonia of the limbs.

Methods: BT injections of hypertonic limbs were administered under ultrasound guidance between 2019 and 2024 for either limb dystonia or limb spasticity.

Results: Of 74 patients included, 57 were diagnosed with spasticity and 17 with dystonia. In total, 276 therapeutic cycles were administered. The dropout rates were 45.6% in the spasticity group and 41.2% in the dystonia group (P = 0.48). There was no significant difference in subjective motor improvement between dystonia and spasticity (P = 0.16). Dystonia patients reported significantly better pain relief (98.5 ± 4.9% vs. 72.4 ± 35.6% respectively, P < 0.001). Notably, 74.3% of dystonia treatments reported moderate or marked improvement, whereas only 54.0% of spasticity treatments did (P > 0.05), based on patient the global impression of change (PGI-C) scale. Side effects were infrequent.

Conclusions: BT injections for limb spasticity and dystonia are partially effective. Nonetheless, the dropout rate is high. While BT injections are more effective in relieving pain for dystonia compared to spasticity, disease severity gradually improves over time in treated patients with spasticity but not with dystonia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Israel Medical Association Journal
Israel Medical Association Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
54
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Israel Medical Association Journal (IMAJ), representing medical sciences and medicine in Israel, is published in English by the Israel Medical Association. The Israel Medical Association Journal (IMAJ) was initiated in 1999.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信