毫安电流对牙种植体周围骨移植体锥形束ct评价的影响。

IF 1.7 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Imaging Science in Dentistry Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-10 DOI:10.5624/isd.20240214
Henrique Mateus Alves Felizardo, Bruna Silveira Troca, Polyane Mazucatto Queiroz, Hugo Gaêta-Araujo
{"title":"毫安电流对牙种植体周围骨移植体锥形束ct评价的影响。","authors":"Henrique Mateus Alves Felizardo, Bruna Silveira Troca, Polyane Mazucatto Queiroz, Hugo Gaêta-Araujo","doi":"10.5624/isd.20240214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Bone grafts can be challenging to assess on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) examinations due to their discreet appearance and the potential introduction of metallic artifacts from implant screws. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of CBCT milliamperage (mA) on detecting bone graft dehiscence adjacent to titanium (Ti) and zirconia (Zr) implants.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty Ti and 20 Zr implants were installed in bovine rib blocks. Gaps of at least 2 mm were created between the implant and the bone and filled with particulate autogenous bone grafts. In half of the blocks, the gap was completely filled, while in the other half, the grafting material was removed up to the third implant thread. CBCT images were acquired at 4, 6.3, and 10 mA and evaluated by 5 observers to detect bone graft dehiscence. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated. These values were then compared across various dental implant materials and mA levels using 2-way analysis of variance with a significance level of 5%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant differences were observed in the diagnostic values for bone graft dehiscence between implant types (<i>P</i>>0.05) or mA settings (<i>P</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although a protocol with lower radiation exposure (that is, lower mA) could be employed, the use of CBCT for evaluating bone graft dehiscence adjacent to different types of dental implants should be approached with caution.</p>","PeriodicalId":51714,"journal":{"name":"Imaging Science in Dentistry","volume":"55 1","pages":"48-55"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11966024/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of milliamperage on cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of bone grafts around dental implants.\",\"authors\":\"Henrique Mateus Alves Felizardo, Bruna Silveira Troca, Polyane Mazucatto Queiroz, Hugo Gaêta-Araujo\",\"doi\":\"10.5624/isd.20240214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Bone grafts can be challenging to assess on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) examinations due to their discreet appearance and the potential introduction of metallic artifacts from implant screws. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of CBCT milliamperage (mA) on detecting bone graft dehiscence adjacent to titanium (Ti) and zirconia (Zr) implants.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty Ti and 20 Zr implants were installed in bovine rib blocks. Gaps of at least 2 mm were created between the implant and the bone and filled with particulate autogenous bone grafts. In half of the blocks, the gap was completely filled, while in the other half, the grafting material was removed up to the third implant thread. CBCT images were acquired at 4, 6.3, and 10 mA and evaluated by 5 observers to detect bone graft dehiscence. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated. These values were then compared across various dental implant materials and mA levels using 2-way analysis of variance with a significance level of 5%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant differences were observed in the diagnostic values for bone graft dehiscence between implant types (<i>P</i>>0.05) or mA settings (<i>P</i>>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although a protocol with lower radiation exposure (that is, lower mA) could be employed, the use of CBCT for evaluating bone graft dehiscence adjacent to different types of dental implants should be approached with caution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Imaging Science in Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"48-55\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11966024/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Imaging Science in Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.20240214\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imaging Science in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.20240214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:由于骨移植的外观不明显,而且可能会引入种植体螺钉的金属伪影,因此在锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)检查中对其进行评估具有挑战性。本研究旨在评估 CBCT 毫安培数(mA)对检测钛(Ti)和氧化锆(Zr)种植体邻近骨移植物开裂的影响:将 20 个钛和 20 个氧化锆种植体安装在牛肋骨块上。在植入物和骨之间形成至少 2 毫米的间隙,并用颗粒状自体骨移植物进行填充。在一半的牛肋骨块中,间隙被完全填满,而在另一半牛肋骨块中,移植材料被移除到第三根种植体螺纹处。在 4、6.3 和 10 mA 下采集 CBCT 图像,并由 5 名观察者进行评估,以检测植骨开裂情况。计算接收者操作特征曲线下面积、准确性、灵敏度和特异性。然后,使用显著性水平为 5%的双向方差分析对不同牙科种植体材料和毫安级别的这些值进行比较:结果:不同种植体类型(P>0.05)或不同 mA 设置(P>0.05)之间的骨移植开裂诊断值没有明显的统计学差异:结论:尽管可以采用辐射量较低的方案(即较低的 mA),但在使用 CBCT 评估不同类型牙科种植体附近的植骨开裂情况时仍需谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of milliamperage on cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of bone grafts around dental implants.

Purpose: Bone grafts can be challenging to assess on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) examinations due to their discreet appearance and the potential introduction of metallic artifacts from implant screws. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of CBCT milliamperage (mA) on detecting bone graft dehiscence adjacent to titanium (Ti) and zirconia (Zr) implants.

Materials and methods: Twenty Ti and 20 Zr implants were installed in bovine rib blocks. Gaps of at least 2 mm were created between the implant and the bone and filled with particulate autogenous bone grafts. In half of the blocks, the gap was completely filled, while in the other half, the grafting material was removed up to the third implant thread. CBCT images were acquired at 4, 6.3, and 10 mA and evaluated by 5 observers to detect bone graft dehiscence. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated. These values were then compared across various dental implant materials and mA levels using 2-way analysis of variance with a significance level of 5%.

Results: No statistically significant differences were observed in the diagnostic values for bone graft dehiscence between implant types (P>0.05) or mA settings (P>0.05).

Conclusion: Although a protocol with lower radiation exposure (that is, lower mA) could be employed, the use of CBCT for evaluating bone graft dehiscence adjacent to different types of dental implants should be approached with caution.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Imaging Science in Dentistry
Imaging Science in Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信