左脑和右脑受损者在话语诱导任务中产生不同类型的熟悉表达。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Seung-Yun Yang, Akiko Fuse, Diana Sidtis, Seung Nam Yang
{"title":"左脑和右脑受损者在话语诱导任务中产生不同类型的熟悉表达。","authors":"Seung-Yun Yang, Akiko Fuse, Diana Sidtis, Seung Nam Yang","doi":"10.1080/02699206.2025.2485077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to explore the production of familiar expressions (e.g. idioms, proverbs and pause fillers), including different subtypes, and their variation across different types of elicited discourse in individuals with aphasia due to left hemisphere damage (LHD) and those with right hemisphere damage (RHD) to healthy control (HCs). Twenty-nine individuals (12 with LHD, 8 with RHD and 9 hCs) provided elicited discourse samples during four tasks (free speech, picture description, story narrative and procedural tasks) from TalkBank (AphasiaBank and RHDBank). Familiar expressions were categorised into two broad types: nuanced (conveying emotional or attitudinal meaning) and non-nuanced (literal and speech-flow enhancing). Results showed that individuals with LHD produced more familiar expressions, especially nuanced ones, than those with RHD or HCs. A correlation was found between aphasia severity and the production of familiar expressions, with individuals who had more severe language impairments producing a higher proportion of familiar expressions in some tasks. No significant task differences in familiar expression production were observed among the groups. This study revealed that brain damage affects the production of familiar expressions, with individuals with LHD using them more frequently and in a more nuanced manner. In contrast, individuals with RHD had difficulty producing familiar expressions. Clinically, this underscores the importance of considering hemisphere-specific deficits when assessing and treating language impairments in individuals with brain damage, as therapies may need to be tailored to address the distinct challenges faced by individuals with LHD versus RHD.</p>","PeriodicalId":49219,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Production of different types of familiar expressions by individuals with left- and right-hemisphere damage across discourse elicitation tasks.\",\"authors\":\"Seung-Yun Yang, Akiko Fuse, Diana Sidtis, Seung Nam Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02699206.2025.2485077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to explore the production of familiar expressions (e.g. idioms, proverbs and pause fillers), including different subtypes, and their variation across different types of elicited discourse in individuals with aphasia due to left hemisphere damage (LHD) and those with right hemisphere damage (RHD) to healthy control (HCs). Twenty-nine individuals (12 with LHD, 8 with RHD and 9 hCs) provided elicited discourse samples during four tasks (free speech, picture description, story narrative and procedural tasks) from TalkBank (AphasiaBank and RHDBank). Familiar expressions were categorised into two broad types: nuanced (conveying emotional or attitudinal meaning) and non-nuanced (literal and speech-flow enhancing). Results showed that individuals with LHD produced more familiar expressions, especially nuanced ones, than those with RHD or HCs. A correlation was found between aphasia severity and the production of familiar expressions, with individuals who had more severe language impairments producing a higher proportion of familiar expressions in some tasks. No significant task differences in familiar expression production were observed among the groups. This study revealed that brain damage affects the production of familiar expressions, with individuals with LHD using them more frequently and in a more nuanced manner. In contrast, individuals with RHD had difficulty producing familiar expressions. Clinically, this underscores the importance of considering hemisphere-specific deficits when assessing and treating language impairments in individuals with brain damage, as therapies may need to be tailored to address the distinct challenges faced by individuals with LHD versus RHD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49219,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2025.2485077\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2025.2485077","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨因左半球损伤(LHD)导致失语的患者和右半球损伤(RHD)导致失语的患者与健康对照组(HCs)之间熟悉表达(如成语、谚语和停顿填充语)(包括不同子类型)的产生及其在不同类型的诱发话语中的变化。29 名患者(12 名 LHD 患者、8 名 RHD 患者和 9 名健康对照者)在 TalkBank(AphasiaBank 和 RHDBank)的四项任务(自由言论、图片描述、故事叙述和程序任务)中提供了诱发话语样本。熟悉的表达被分为两大类:细微表达(传达情感或态度含义)和非细微表达(字面意思和增强语流)。结果表明,与失认症患者或语流障碍患者相比,失认症患者使用了更多熟悉的表达方式,尤其是细微表达方式。研究发现,失语症严重程度与熟悉表达的产生之间存在相关性,语言障碍更严重的患者在某些任务中产生熟悉表达的比例更高。各组之间在熟悉表达的产生方面没有观察到明显的任务差异。这项研究表明,脑损伤会影响熟悉的表达方式的使用,语言障碍患者使用熟悉的表达方式的频率更高,使用的方式也更细致入微。相比之下,RHD 患者则很难做出熟悉的表情。在临床上,这强调了在评估和治疗脑损伤患者的语言障碍时考虑大脑半球特异性缺陷的重要性,因为可能需要针对 LHD 患者和 RHD 患者面临的不同挑战调整治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Production of different types of familiar expressions by individuals with left- and right-hemisphere damage across discourse elicitation tasks.

This study aimed to explore the production of familiar expressions (e.g. idioms, proverbs and pause fillers), including different subtypes, and their variation across different types of elicited discourse in individuals with aphasia due to left hemisphere damage (LHD) and those with right hemisphere damage (RHD) to healthy control (HCs). Twenty-nine individuals (12 with LHD, 8 with RHD and 9 hCs) provided elicited discourse samples during four tasks (free speech, picture description, story narrative and procedural tasks) from TalkBank (AphasiaBank and RHDBank). Familiar expressions were categorised into two broad types: nuanced (conveying emotional or attitudinal meaning) and non-nuanced (literal and speech-flow enhancing). Results showed that individuals with LHD produced more familiar expressions, especially nuanced ones, than those with RHD or HCs. A correlation was found between aphasia severity and the production of familiar expressions, with individuals who had more severe language impairments producing a higher proportion of familiar expressions in some tasks. No significant task differences in familiar expression production were observed among the groups. This study revealed that brain damage affects the production of familiar expressions, with individuals with LHD using them more frequently and in a more nuanced manner. In contrast, individuals with RHD had difficulty producing familiar expressions. Clinically, this underscores the importance of considering hemisphere-specific deficits when assessing and treating language impairments in individuals with brain damage, as therapies may need to be tailored to address the distinct challenges faced by individuals with LHD versus RHD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics
Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
74
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics encompasses the following: Linguistics and phonetics of disorders of speech and language; Contribution of data from communication disorders to theories of speech production and perception; Research on communication disorders in multilingual populations, and in under-researched populations, and languages other than English; Pragmatic aspects of speech and language disorders; Clinical dialectology and sociolinguistics; Childhood, adolescent and adult disorders of communication; Linguistics and phonetics of hearing impairment, sign language and lip-reading.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信