协助死亡的道德。

IF 1.3 3区 哲学 Q3 ETHICS
Stephen Richards
{"title":"协助死亡的道德。","authors":"Stephen Richards","doi":"10.1093/jmp/jhaf003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This essay analyzes the morality of assisted dying. To do this, it is necessary to recognize that assisted dying is the outworking of a larger process. This process unavoidably begins with the key moral conception of human dignity. Emphasis upon individualism in society has caused a restructuring of the dignity concept, changing what is most highly valued. This altered concept of dignity gives rise to assisted dying, yet is morally flawed. This is because it is an understanding of dignity that minimizes people's vulnerability, dismisses coercive forces that are brought into effect, encourages undue confidence in safeguards, and removes any sustained basis for respect of the individual. Autonomy, as the primary justification for assisted dying in contemporary society, is an abbreviated understanding of the restructured concept of dignity and therefore subject to the same criticisms. Assisted dying arises from a deficient and self-defeating foundation that mark it as immoral.</p>","PeriodicalId":47377,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medicine and Philosophy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Morality of Assisted Dying.\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Richards\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jmp/jhaf003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This essay analyzes the morality of assisted dying. To do this, it is necessary to recognize that assisted dying is the outworking of a larger process. This process unavoidably begins with the key moral conception of human dignity. Emphasis upon individualism in society has caused a restructuring of the dignity concept, changing what is most highly valued. This altered concept of dignity gives rise to assisted dying, yet is morally flawed. This is because it is an understanding of dignity that minimizes people's vulnerability, dismisses coercive forces that are brought into effect, encourages undue confidence in safeguards, and removes any sustained basis for respect of the individual. Autonomy, as the primary justification for assisted dying in contemporary society, is an abbreviated understanding of the restructured concept of dignity and therefore subject to the same criticisms. Assisted dying arises from a deficient and self-defeating foundation that mark it as immoral.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medicine and Philosophy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medicine and Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhaf003\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medicine and Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhaf003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了协助死亡的道德问题。要做到这一点,有必要认识到辅助死亡是一个更大过程的结果。这一过程不可避免地始于人类尊严这一关键的道德观念。社会对个人主义的强调导致了尊严概念的重构,改变了最受重视的东西。这种改变了的尊严概念导致了协助死亡,但在道德上是有缺陷的。这是因为,只有对尊严的理解,才能最大限度地减少人的脆弱性,解除实施的强制力量,鼓励对保障措施的过分信任,并消除尊重个人的任何持久基础。作为当代社会协助死亡的主要理由,自主权是对重新构建的尊严概念的简略理解,因此受到同样的批评。辅助死亡产生于一个有缺陷和自我挫败的基础,这标志着它是不道德的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Morality of Assisted Dying.

This essay analyzes the morality of assisted dying. To do this, it is necessary to recognize that assisted dying is the outworking of a larger process. This process unavoidably begins with the key moral conception of human dignity. Emphasis upon individualism in society has caused a restructuring of the dignity concept, changing what is most highly valued. This altered concept of dignity gives rise to assisted dying, yet is morally flawed. This is because it is an understanding of dignity that minimizes people's vulnerability, dismisses coercive forces that are brought into effect, encourages undue confidence in safeguards, and removes any sustained basis for respect of the individual. Autonomy, as the primary justification for assisted dying in contemporary society, is an abbreviated understanding of the restructured concept of dignity and therefore subject to the same criticisms. Assisted dying arises from a deficient and self-defeating foundation that mark it as immoral.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: This bimonthly publication explores the shared themes and concerns of philosophy and the medical sciences. Central issues in medical research and practice have important philosophical dimensions, for, in treating disease and promoting health, medicine involves presuppositions about human goals and values. Conversely, the concerns of philosophy often significantly relate to those of medicine, as philosophers seek to understand the nature of medical knowledge and the human condition in the modern world. In addition, recent developments in medical technology and treatment create moral problems that raise important philosophical questions. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy aims to provide an ongoing forum for the discussion of such themes and issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信