评估Durvalumab联合放疗用于晚期膀胱癌二线治疗的有效性和安全性

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Dongyang Yu, Dawei Liu, Yang Liu
{"title":"评估Durvalumab联合放疗用于晚期膀胱癌二线治疗的有效性和安全性","authors":"Dongyang Yu, Dawei Liu, Yang Liu","doi":"10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20257802.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bladder cancer is a common malignancy that arises from the urothelium. Treatment options for advanced bladder cancer remain limited, particularly in patients who have progressed after first-line therapy. Immunotherapy with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors, such as durvalumab, has shown promise in improving outcomes in these patients. Radiotherapy (RT) is another modality that can be integrated to enhance local tumour control. This study explored the efficacy and safety of combining durvalumab with RT as a second-line treatment for patients with advanced bladder cancer, aiming to provide insights into its potential therapeutic benefits. Bladder cancer is a type of malignant tumour that arises from the epithelial lining of the bladder and commonly manifests as haematuria and frequent urination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 58 patients who were diagnosed with advanced bladder cancer and treated at our hospital between January 2020 and June 2022 were retrospectively analysed. Patients were divided into two groups: A control group (n = 33) receiving durvalumab monotherapy and an observation group (n = 25) receiving durvalumab combined with RT. The remission rates, two-year survival rates, median survival times, serum tumour marker levels and adverse events of the two groups were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Before treatment, the differences in the serum tumour marker levels between the two groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05) were not significant. Compared with the control group, the observation group presented significantly lower serum tumour marker levels (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Furthermore, compared with the control group, the observation group had a higher overall clinical objective response rate (96.00% vs. 75.76%) and a better two-year survival rate (40.00% vs. 15.15%). Additionally, progression-free survival (PFS) was longer in the observation group (18 months vs. 16 months, <i>p</i> = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Durvalumab combined with RT as a second-line treatment for advanced bladder cancer effectively reduces the expression of tumour markers and improves two-year survival and PFS, offering valuable clinical insights.</p>","PeriodicalId":48852,"journal":{"name":"Archivos Espanoles De Urologia","volume":"78 2","pages":"248-254"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Durvalumab Plus Radiotherapy in Second-Line Treatment for Advanced Bladder Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Dongyang Yu, Dawei Liu, Yang Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20257802.33\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bladder cancer is a common malignancy that arises from the urothelium. Treatment options for advanced bladder cancer remain limited, particularly in patients who have progressed after first-line therapy. Immunotherapy with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors, such as durvalumab, has shown promise in improving outcomes in these patients. Radiotherapy (RT) is another modality that can be integrated to enhance local tumour control. This study explored the efficacy and safety of combining durvalumab with RT as a second-line treatment for patients with advanced bladder cancer, aiming to provide insights into its potential therapeutic benefits. Bladder cancer is a type of malignant tumour that arises from the epithelial lining of the bladder and commonly manifests as haematuria and frequent urination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 58 patients who were diagnosed with advanced bladder cancer and treated at our hospital between January 2020 and June 2022 were retrospectively analysed. Patients were divided into two groups: A control group (n = 33) receiving durvalumab monotherapy and an observation group (n = 25) receiving durvalumab combined with RT. The remission rates, two-year survival rates, median survival times, serum tumour marker levels and adverse events of the two groups were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Before treatment, the differences in the serum tumour marker levels between the two groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05) were not significant. Compared with the control group, the observation group presented significantly lower serum tumour marker levels (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Furthermore, compared with the control group, the observation group had a higher overall clinical objective response rate (96.00% vs. 75.76%) and a better two-year survival rate (40.00% vs. 15.15%). Additionally, progression-free survival (PFS) was longer in the observation group (18 months vs. 16 months, <i>p</i> = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Durvalumab combined with RT as a second-line treatment for advanced bladder cancer effectively reduces the expression of tumour markers and improves two-year survival and PFS, offering valuable clinical insights.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archivos Espanoles De Urologia\",\"volume\":\"78 2\",\"pages\":\"248-254\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archivos Espanoles De Urologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20257802.33\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos Espanoles De Urologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20257802.33","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:膀胱癌是一种常见的起源于尿路上皮的恶性肿瘤。晚期膀胱癌的治疗选择仍然有限,特别是在一线治疗后进展的患者。使用程序性死亡配体1 (PD-L1)抑制剂(如durvalumab)的免疫治疗已显示出改善这些患者预后的希望。放射治疗(RT)是另一种可以整合的方式,以加强局部肿瘤控制。本研究探讨了durvalumab联合RT作为晚期膀胱癌患者的二线治疗的有效性和安全性,旨在深入了解其潜在的治疗益处。膀胱癌是一种起源于膀胱上皮的恶性肿瘤,通常表现为血尿和尿频。方法:对2020年1月至2022年6月在我院治疗的58例晚期膀胱癌患者进行回顾性分析。将患者分为两组:对照组(n = 33)接受durvalumab单药治疗,观察组(n = 25)接受durvalumab联合rt治疗。比较两组患者的缓解率、2年生存率、中位生存时间、血清肿瘤标志物水平和不良事件。结果:治疗前,两组患者血清肿瘤标志物水平比较,差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。观察组患者血清肿瘤标志物水平显著低于对照组(p < 0.05)。观察组患者临床客观总有效率(96.00% vs. 75.76%)高于对照组,2年生存率(40.00% vs. 15.15%)高于对照组。此外,观察组的无进展生存期(PFS)更长(18个月比16个月,p = 0.001)。结论:Durvalumab联合RT作为晚期膀胱癌的二线治疗可有效降低肿瘤标志物的表达,提高两年生存率和PFS,提供有价值的临床见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Durvalumab Plus Radiotherapy in Second-Line Treatment for Advanced Bladder Cancer.

Background: Bladder cancer is a common malignancy that arises from the urothelium. Treatment options for advanced bladder cancer remain limited, particularly in patients who have progressed after first-line therapy. Immunotherapy with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors, such as durvalumab, has shown promise in improving outcomes in these patients. Radiotherapy (RT) is another modality that can be integrated to enhance local tumour control. This study explored the efficacy and safety of combining durvalumab with RT as a second-line treatment for patients with advanced bladder cancer, aiming to provide insights into its potential therapeutic benefits. Bladder cancer is a type of malignant tumour that arises from the epithelial lining of the bladder and commonly manifests as haematuria and frequent urination.

Methods: A total of 58 patients who were diagnosed with advanced bladder cancer and treated at our hospital between January 2020 and June 2022 were retrospectively analysed. Patients were divided into two groups: A control group (n = 33) receiving durvalumab monotherapy and an observation group (n = 25) receiving durvalumab combined with RT. The remission rates, two-year survival rates, median survival times, serum tumour marker levels and adverse events of the two groups were compared.

Results: Before treatment, the differences in the serum tumour marker levels between the two groups (p > 0.05) were not significant. Compared with the control group, the observation group presented significantly lower serum tumour marker levels (p < 0.05). Furthermore, compared with the control group, the observation group had a higher overall clinical objective response rate (96.00% vs. 75.76%) and a better two-year survival rate (40.00% vs. 15.15%). Additionally, progression-free survival (PFS) was longer in the observation group (18 months vs. 16 months, p = 0.001).

Conclusions: Durvalumab combined with RT as a second-line treatment for advanced bladder cancer effectively reduces the expression of tumour markers and improves two-year survival and PFS, offering valuable clinical insights.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archivos Espanoles De Urologia
Archivos Espanoles De Urologia UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: Archivos Españoles de Urología published since 1944, is an international peer review, susbscription Journal on Urology with original and review articles on different subjets in Urology: oncology, endourology, laparoscopic, andrology, lithiasis, pediatrics , urodynamics,... Case Report are also admitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信