作为泌尿系统癌症预后预测指标的老年营养风险指数:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Yuefen Chen, Mei Wen, Zhe Yu, Fengjiao Xu
{"title":"作为泌尿系统癌症预后预测指标的老年营养风险指数:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Yuefen Chen, Mei Wen, Zhe Yu, Fengjiao Xu","doi":"10.1159/000544793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) is being used to predict outcomes of several malignancies. However, its utility for urinary tract cancer has not been systematically analyzed. We present the first meta-analysis examining the association between GNRI and the prognosis of urological cancers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This PROSPERO registered review searched Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus up to 25th November 2024 for studies examining the relationship between GNRI and overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and progression-free survival (PFS) after urological cancers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 studies were eligible. Three studies on bladder cancer, four on prostate cancer, seven on renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and six on urothelial cancers. Meta-analysis showed that low GNRI was a statistically significant predictor of poor OS in prostate cancer (OR: 3.02 95% CI: 1.61, 5.67). Pooled analysis showed that low GNRI was associated with poor OS (OR: 2.17 95% CI: 1.46, 3.22) and CSS (OR: 2.60 95% CI: 1.57, 4.30) in RCC but not PFS (OR: 1.50 95% CI: 1.00, 2.24). Pooled analysis also found that low GNRI was a predictor of worse OS (OR: 2.24 95% CI: 1.52, 3.29) and CSS (OR: 3.07 95% CI: 1.38, 6.86) in urothelial carcinoma. A narrative review on bladder cancer and GNRI showed mixed results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GNRI may have a role in predicting outcomes of urological malignancies. Low GNRI was independently associated with worse OS after prostate, renal cell, and urothelial carcinoma. Further, it also predicted CSS after RCC and urothelial carcinoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":23414,"journal":{"name":"Urologia Internationalis","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The geriatric nutritional risk index as a predictor of outcomes in urological cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yuefen Chen, Mei Wen, Zhe Yu, Fengjiao Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000544793\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) is being used to predict outcomes of several malignancies. However, its utility for urinary tract cancer has not been systematically analyzed. We present the first meta-analysis examining the association between GNRI and the prognosis of urological cancers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This PROSPERO registered review searched Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus up to 25th November 2024 for studies examining the relationship between GNRI and overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and progression-free survival (PFS) after urological cancers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 studies were eligible. Three studies on bladder cancer, four on prostate cancer, seven on renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and six on urothelial cancers. Meta-analysis showed that low GNRI was a statistically significant predictor of poor OS in prostate cancer (OR: 3.02 95% CI: 1.61, 5.67). Pooled analysis showed that low GNRI was associated with poor OS (OR: 2.17 95% CI: 1.46, 3.22) and CSS (OR: 2.60 95% CI: 1.57, 4.30) in RCC but not PFS (OR: 1.50 95% CI: 1.00, 2.24). Pooled analysis also found that low GNRI was a predictor of worse OS (OR: 2.24 95% CI: 1.52, 3.29) and CSS (OR: 3.07 95% CI: 1.38, 6.86) in urothelial carcinoma. A narrative review on bladder cancer and GNRI showed mixed results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GNRI may have a role in predicting outcomes of urological malignancies. Low GNRI was independently associated with worse OS after prostate, renal cell, and urothelial carcinoma. Further, it also predicted CSS after RCC and urothelial carcinoma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologia Internationalis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologia Internationalis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000544793\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologia Internationalis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000544793","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:老年人营养风险指数(GNRI)正被用于预测几种恶性肿瘤的预后。然而,其在尿路癌中的应用尚未得到系统的分析。我们提出了第一个荟萃分析,检查GNRI与泌尿系统癌症预后之间的关系。方法:本PROSPERO注册综述检索Embase、PubMed、Web of Science和Scopus,检索截止到2024年11月25日的泌尿系统癌症后GNRI与总生存期(OS)、癌症特异性生存期(CSS)和无进展生存期(PFS)之间关系的研究。结果:共有20项研究符合条件。三项关于膀胱癌的研究,四项关于前列腺癌的研究,七项关于肾细胞癌的研究,六项关于尿路上皮癌的研究。荟萃分析显示,低GNRI是前列腺癌不良OS的统计学显著预测因子(OR: 3.02, 95% CI: 1.61, 5.67)。合并分析显示,低GNRI与RCC的不良OS (OR: 2.17 95% CI: 1.46, 3.22)和CSS (OR: 2.60 95% CI: 1.57, 4.30)相关,但与PFS无关(OR: 1.50 95% CI: 1.00, 2.24)。合并分析还发现,低GNRI是尿路上皮癌更差的OS (OR: 2.24 95% CI: 1.52, 3.29)和CSS (OR: 3.07 95% CI: 1.38, 6.86)的预测因子。一项关于膀胱癌和GNRI的叙述性综述显示了不同的结果。结论:GNRI可能对泌尿系统恶性肿瘤预后有预测作用。低GNRI与前列腺癌、肾细胞癌和尿路上皮癌后较差的OS独立相关。此外,它还可以预测RCC和尿路上皮癌后的CSS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The geriatric nutritional risk index as a predictor of outcomes in urological cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective: The geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) is being used to predict outcomes of several malignancies. However, its utility for urinary tract cancer has not been systematically analyzed. We present the first meta-analysis examining the association between GNRI and the prognosis of urological cancers.

Methods: This PROSPERO registered review searched Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus up to 25th November 2024 for studies examining the relationship between GNRI and overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and progression-free survival (PFS) after urological cancers.

Results: A total of 20 studies were eligible. Three studies on bladder cancer, four on prostate cancer, seven on renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and six on urothelial cancers. Meta-analysis showed that low GNRI was a statistically significant predictor of poor OS in prostate cancer (OR: 3.02 95% CI: 1.61, 5.67). Pooled analysis showed that low GNRI was associated with poor OS (OR: 2.17 95% CI: 1.46, 3.22) and CSS (OR: 2.60 95% CI: 1.57, 4.30) in RCC but not PFS (OR: 1.50 95% CI: 1.00, 2.24). Pooled analysis also found that low GNRI was a predictor of worse OS (OR: 2.24 95% CI: 1.52, 3.29) and CSS (OR: 3.07 95% CI: 1.38, 6.86) in urothelial carcinoma. A narrative review on bladder cancer and GNRI showed mixed results.

Conclusion: GNRI may have a role in predicting outcomes of urological malignancies. Low GNRI was independently associated with worse OS after prostate, renal cell, and urothelial carcinoma. Further, it also predicted CSS after RCC and urothelial carcinoma.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urologia Internationalis
Urologia Internationalis 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
94
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Concise but fully substantiated international reports of clinically oriented research into science and current management of urogenital disorders form the nucleus of original as well as basic research papers. These are supplemented by up-to-date reviews by international experts on the state-of-the-art of key topics of clinical urological practice. Essential topics receiving regular coverage include the introduction of new techniques and instrumentation as well as the evaluation of new functional tests and diagnostic methods. Special attention is given to advances in surgical techniques and clinical oncology. The regular publication of selected case reports represents the great variation in urological disease and illustrates treatment solutions in singular cases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信