颈部剂量限制环可减少接受 IMRT 的早期鼻咽癌患者的头颈部淋巴水肿:剂量学-临床验证。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Kai Liao, Yunhong Tian, Huijun Li, Ronghui Zheng
{"title":"颈部剂量限制环可减少接受 IMRT 的早期鼻咽癌患者的头颈部淋巴水肿:剂量学-临床验证。","authors":"Kai Liao, Yunhong Tian, Huijun Li, Ronghui Zheng","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-96339-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to determine the optimal limiting dose to reduce head and neck lymphedema in patients with early nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) receiving intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) by setting dose limiting rings at the anterior and posterior regions of the neck. A total of 15 patients with early NPC were included, and 5 sets of IMRT plans were designed for each patient. Plan A was a conventional plan without dose limiting rings, while Plans B-E were set dose limiting rings with gradients of 20 Gy, 18 Gy, 16 Gy, and 14 Gy, respectively, whose remaining parameters were consistent with Plan A. Through Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) for randomized block design data and Bonferroni pairwise multiple comparisons, the impact of dose limiting rings on target coverage and doses to organs at risk was evaluated and the optimal limiting dose was determined. After that, 50 patients with early NPC (25 with rings according to the optimal limiting dose, 25 without rings) were treated with IMRT to determine if there was a difference in the incidence of head and neck lymphedema. Ultimately, 16 Gy was determined as the optimal limiting dose threshold for achieving the balance of target coverage and protection of organs at risk. Compared with the conventional plan, setting cervical anterior and posterior dose limiting rings of 16 Gy did not affect the target dose coverage (all P > 0.05), only slightly affected homogeneity index and increased monitor units (MUs) (both P < 0.05). The doses of the inner ears, mandible, and brainstem were not affected (all P > 0.05), meanwhile, the doses of the oral cavity, larynx, and thyroid were reduced significantly (all P < 0.05). The doses of the parotid glands and spinal cord slightly increased (both P < 0.05), but still within the tolerance range. Clinical cohort verification showed that setting the dose limiting rings of 16 Gy at the anterior and posterior regions of the neck significantly reduced the occurrence of head and neck lymphedema (P < 0.05). Through dosimetric and clinical cohort verification studies, the optimal limiting dose for the cervical anterior and posterior dose limiting rings has been determined, hoping to provide a new design method of IMRT plans to reduce head and neck lymphedema after radiotherapy for early NPC.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"11755"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11973186/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neck dose-limiting rings reduce head and neck lymphedema in early nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients undergoing IMRT: a dosimetric-clinical validation.\",\"authors\":\"Kai Liao, Yunhong Tian, Huijun Li, Ronghui Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-96339-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to determine the optimal limiting dose to reduce head and neck lymphedema in patients with early nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) receiving intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) by setting dose limiting rings at the anterior and posterior regions of the neck. A total of 15 patients with early NPC were included, and 5 sets of IMRT plans were designed for each patient. Plan A was a conventional plan without dose limiting rings, while Plans B-E were set dose limiting rings with gradients of 20 Gy, 18 Gy, 16 Gy, and 14 Gy, respectively, whose remaining parameters were consistent with Plan A. Through Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) for randomized block design data and Bonferroni pairwise multiple comparisons, the impact of dose limiting rings on target coverage and doses to organs at risk was evaluated and the optimal limiting dose was determined. After that, 50 patients with early NPC (25 with rings according to the optimal limiting dose, 25 without rings) were treated with IMRT to determine if there was a difference in the incidence of head and neck lymphedema. Ultimately, 16 Gy was determined as the optimal limiting dose threshold for achieving the balance of target coverage and protection of organs at risk. Compared with the conventional plan, setting cervical anterior and posterior dose limiting rings of 16 Gy did not affect the target dose coverage (all P > 0.05), only slightly affected homogeneity index and increased monitor units (MUs) (both P < 0.05). The doses of the inner ears, mandible, and brainstem were not affected (all P > 0.05), meanwhile, the doses of the oral cavity, larynx, and thyroid were reduced significantly (all P < 0.05). The doses of the parotid glands and spinal cord slightly increased (both P < 0.05), but still within the tolerance range. Clinical cohort verification showed that setting the dose limiting rings of 16 Gy at the anterior and posterior regions of the neck significantly reduced the occurrence of head and neck lymphedema (P < 0.05). Through dosimetric and clinical cohort verification studies, the optimal limiting dose for the cervical anterior and posterior dose limiting rings has been determined, hoping to provide a new design method of IMRT plans to reduce head and neck lymphedema after radiotherapy for early NPC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"11755\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11973186/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-96339-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-96339-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在通过在颈部前后区域设置剂量限制环,确定早期鼻咽癌(NPC)接受调强放疗(IMRT)患者减少头颈部淋巴水肿的最佳限制剂量。共纳入15例早期鼻咽癌患者,为每位患者设计5套IMRT方案。方案A为常规方案,不设剂量限制环,方案B-E分别设置梯度为20 Gy、18 Gy、16 Gy、14 Gy的剂量限制环,其余参数与方案A一致。通过随机区组设计数据的方差分析和Bonferroni两两多重比较,评价剂量限制环对靶覆盖率和危及器官剂量的影响,确定最佳剂量限制剂量。之后,对50例早期鼻咽癌患者(25例根据最佳限制剂量有环,25例无环)进行IMRT治疗,以确定头颈部淋巴水肿的发生率是否有差异。最终,16 Gy被确定为达到目标覆盖和保护危险器官平衡的最佳限制剂量阈值。与常规方案相比,设置16 Gy的颈椎前后限剂量环不影响靶剂量覆盖(均P < 0.05),仅轻微影响均匀性指数和增加监测单位(MUs)(均P < 0.05),同时口腔、喉部和甲状腺的剂量明显降低(均P < 0.05)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Neck dose-limiting rings reduce head and neck lymphedema in early nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients undergoing IMRT: a dosimetric-clinical validation.

Neck dose-limiting rings reduce head and neck lymphedema in early nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients undergoing IMRT: a dosimetric-clinical validation.

This study aimed to determine the optimal limiting dose to reduce head and neck lymphedema in patients with early nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) receiving intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) by setting dose limiting rings at the anterior and posterior regions of the neck. A total of 15 patients with early NPC were included, and 5 sets of IMRT plans were designed for each patient. Plan A was a conventional plan without dose limiting rings, while Plans B-E were set dose limiting rings with gradients of 20 Gy, 18 Gy, 16 Gy, and 14 Gy, respectively, whose remaining parameters were consistent with Plan A. Through Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) for randomized block design data and Bonferroni pairwise multiple comparisons, the impact of dose limiting rings on target coverage and doses to organs at risk was evaluated and the optimal limiting dose was determined. After that, 50 patients with early NPC (25 with rings according to the optimal limiting dose, 25 without rings) were treated with IMRT to determine if there was a difference in the incidence of head and neck lymphedema. Ultimately, 16 Gy was determined as the optimal limiting dose threshold for achieving the balance of target coverage and protection of organs at risk. Compared with the conventional plan, setting cervical anterior and posterior dose limiting rings of 16 Gy did not affect the target dose coverage (all P > 0.05), only slightly affected homogeneity index and increased monitor units (MUs) (both P < 0.05). The doses of the inner ears, mandible, and brainstem were not affected (all P > 0.05), meanwhile, the doses of the oral cavity, larynx, and thyroid were reduced significantly (all P < 0.05). The doses of the parotid glands and spinal cord slightly increased (both P < 0.05), but still within the tolerance range. Clinical cohort verification showed that setting the dose limiting rings of 16 Gy at the anterior and posterior regions of the neck significantly reduced the occurrence of head and neck lymphedema (P < 0.05). Through dosimetric and clinical cohort verification studies, the optimal limiting dose for the cervical anterior and posterior dose limiting rings has been determined, hoping to provide a new design method of IMRT plans to reduce head and neck lymphedema after radiotherapy for early NPC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信