创新评估策略:针对放射学研究生学员的基于图像的关键特征问题。

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Nasreen Naz, K Hussain, V Bari, Nida Rafiq, A Afzal
{"title":"创新评估策略:针对放射学研究生学员的基于图像的关键特征问题。","authors":"Nasreen Naz, K Hussain, V Bari, Nida Rafiq, A Afzal","doi":"10.1186/s12909-024-06487-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Innovative assessment strategies are essential for determining clinical understanding in the evolving field of health profession education. Key feature questions (KFQs) have been developed as assessment tools to assess the clinical understanding of students. The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of image-based key feature questions (IBKFQs) compared with traditional multiple-choice questions (MCQs) in radiology examinations. Additionally, this study aims to determine the correlation between test scores obtained in both test formats.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This quasi experimental, correlation study was conducted from September to December 2021 at a public medical university in Karachi, Pakistan. Thirty radiology residents from various training years participated in the study. Each resident completed a comprehensive written assessment comprising 50 MCQs and 50 IB-KFQs as part of their internal evaluation at the end of a module.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of thirty residents, 28 (93.3%) were females. The reliability score and Cronbach's alpha were 0.944 for the MCQs and 0.881 for the IB-KFQs. Spearman's correlation coefficient revealed a positive correlation between the MCQ and IB-KFQ scores (rho = 0.823, p < 0.001). The mean scores were similar for the IB-KFQs (29.24 ± 6.31) and MCQs (28.93 ± 11.41).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this study indicate that incorporating IB-KFQs alongside MCQs in written assessments of radiology residents is feasible. IB-KFQs offer a focused evaluation of critical skills such as film analysis, interpretation, and report writing. By complementing traditional MCQs, IB-KFQs enhance the assessment process.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"488"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11974222/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Innovative assesment strategies: image based key feature questions for radiology postgraduate trainees.\",\"authors\":\"Nasreen Naz, K Hussain, V Bari, Nida Rafiq, A Afzal\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12909-024-06487-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Innovative assessment strategies are essential for determining clinical understanding in the evolving field of health profession education. Key feature questions (KFQs) have been developed as assessment tools to assess the clinical understanding of students. The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of image-based key feature questions (IBKFQs) compared with traditional multiple-choice questions (MCQs) in radiology examinations. Additionally, this study aims to determine the correlation between test scores obtained in both test formats.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This quasi experimental, correlation study was conducted from September to December 2021 at a public medical university in Karachi, Pakistan. Thirty radiology residents from various training years participated in the study. Each resident completed a comprehensive written assessment comprising 50 MCQs and 50 IB-KFQs as part of their internal evaluation at the end of a module.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of thirty residents, 28 (93.3%) were females. The reliability score and Cronbach's alpha were 0.944 for the MCQs and 0.881 for the IB-KFQs. Spearman's correlation coefficient revealed a positive correlation between the MCQ and IB-KFQ scores (rho = 0.823, p < 0.001). The mean scores were similar for the IB-KFQs (29.24 ± 6.31) and MCQs (28.93 ± 11.41).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this study indicate that incorporating IB-KFQs alongside MCQs in written assessments of radiology residents is feasible. IB-KFQs offer a focused evaluation of critical skills such as film analysis, interpretation, and report writing. By complementing traditional MCQs, IB-KFQs enhance the assessment process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Education\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"488\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11974222/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06487-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06487-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Innovative assesment strategies: image based key feature questions for radiology postgraduate trainees.

Background: Innovative assessment strategies are essential for determining clinical understanding in the evolving field of health profession education. Key feature questions (KFQs) have been developed as assessment tools to assess the clinical understanding of students. The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of image-based key feature questions (IBKFQs) compared with traditional multiple-choice questions (MCQs) in radiology examinations. Additionally, this study aims to determine the correlation between test scores obtained in both test formats.

Method: This quasi experimental, correlation study was conducted from September to December 2021 at a public medical university in Karachi, Pakistan. Thirty radiology residents from various training years participated in the study. Each resident completed a comprehensive written assessment comprising 50 MCQs and 50 IB-KFQs as part of their internal evaluation at the end of a module.

Results: Out of thirty residents, 28 (93.3%) were females. The reliability score and Cronbach's alpha were 0.944 for the MCQs and 0.881 for the IB-KFQs. Spearman's correlation coefficient revealed a positive correlation between the MCQ and IB-KFQ scores (rho = 0.823, p < 0.001). The mean scores were similar for the IB-KFQs (29.24 ± 6.31) and MCQs (28.93 ± 11.41).

Conclusion: The findings of this study indicate that incorporating IB-KFQs alongside MCQs in written assessments of radiology residents is feasible. IB-KFQs offer a focused evaluation of critical skills such as film analysis, interpretation, and report writing. By complementing traditional MCQs, IB-KFQs enhance the assessment process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信