探索医学模拟学习的最佳小组规模:系统回顾。

IF 2 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Cassandra Mackey, Simi Jandu, James Fidrocki, Tyler Raduzycki, Jennifer Carey
{"title":"探索医学模拟学习的最佳小组规模:系统回顾。","authors":"Cassandra Mackey, Simi Jandu, James Fidrocki, Tyler Raduzycki, Jennifer Carey","doi":"10.1177/23821205251327287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Simulation is an effective teaching method that improves learner competence and confidence. Optimizing group size balances efficiency without sacrificing efficacy. While simulation technology is widely used in medical education, no standard for learner group size exists. This study investigates the optimal group size for simulation, aiming to identify best practices that maximize efficiency and efficacy in learning environments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review adheres to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. A team of emergency medicine educators screened citations and reviewed relevant full-text articles. Inclusion criteria focused on group sizes with the best outcomes. Quality assessment employed the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument approach to evaluate evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-four articles were identified; 17 were deemed relevant for full-text review. The studies varied in methods, including prospective and retrospective reviews, mixed methods, and randomized controlled trials. Smaller groups improved outcomes, with an ideal size dependent on learning objectives. Five studies suggested groups of up to 4 learners were optimal, with mixed results on the exact number. One study identified 6 as the ideal group size. Debriefing was effective in larger groups, while procedural skills were best taught in groups of 2 to 4 learners.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review suggests smaller group sizes are more effective for efficiency, knowledge, and confidence. For procedural skills, groups of 2 to 4 are most effective, and effectiveness declines with more than 6 participants. Smaller groups allow for more hands-on learning and cognitive engagement. While clinical skills can be taught in larger groups, learners favor smaller groups for debriefing and complex scenarios. Effective curriculum planning should account for available resources, the type of simulation, and the material being taught, with group sizes adjusted to optimize learning outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":45121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","volume":"12 ","pages":"23821205251327287"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11970070/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Optimal Group Sizes for Learning in Medical Simulation: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Cassandra Mackey, Simi Jandu, James Fidrocki, Tyler Raduzycki, Jennifer Carey\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23821205251327287\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Simulation is an effective teaching method that improves learner competence and confidence. Optimizing group size balances efficiency without sacrificing efficacy. While simulation technology is widely used in medical education, no standard for learner group size exists. This study investigates the optimal group size for simulation, aiming to identify best practices that maximize efficiency and efficacy in learning environments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review adheres to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. A team of emergency medicine educators screened citations and reviewed relevant full-text articles. Inclusion criteria focused on group sizes with the best outcomes. Quality assessment employed the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument approach to evaluate evidence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-four articles were identified; 17 were deemed relevant for full-text review. The studies varied in methods, including prospective and retrospective reviews, mixed methods, and randomized controlled trials. Smaller groups improved outcomes, with an ideal size dependent on learning objectives. Five studies suggested groups of up to 4 learners were optimal, with mixed results on the exact number. One study identified 6 as the ideal group size. Debriefing was effective in larger groups, while procedural skills were best taught in groups of 2 to 4 learners.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review suggests smaller group sizes are more effective for efficiency, knowledge, and confidence. For procedural skills, groups of 2 to 4 are most effective, and effectiveness declines with more than 6 participants. Smaller groups allow for more hands-on learning and cognitive engagement. While clinical skills can be taught in larger groups, learners favor smaller groups for debriefing and complex scenarios. Effective curriculum planning should account for available resources, the type of simulation, and the material being taught, with group sizes adjusted to optimize learning outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"23821205251327287\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11970070/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205251327287\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23821205251327287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:模拟教学是提高学习者能力和自信心的有效教学方法。优化团队规模可以在不牺牲功效的情况下平衡效率。虽然模拟技术在医学教育中得到了广泛的应用,但对学习者群体的大小尚无标准。本研究探讨了模拟的最佳群体规模,旨在确定在学习环境中最大化效率和功效的最佳实践。方法:本系统评价遵循系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目。一组急诊医学教育工作者筛选引文和审查相关全文文章。纳入标准侧重于具有最佳结果的群体规模。质量评价采用医学教育研究质量工具方法评价证据。结果:共鉴定出34篇;17项被认为与全文审查相关。研究方法多种多样,包括前瞻性和回顾性评价、混合方法和随机对照试验。较小的小组改善了结果,理想的规模取决于学习目标。五项研究表明,最多4人的学习小组是最佳的,但具体数字的结果好坏参半。一项研究确定6人是理想的群体规模。汇报在较大的小组中是有效的,而程序技能在2到4个学习者的小组中是最好的。结论:本综述提示较小的群体规模对效率、知识和信心更有效。对于程序性技能,2到4人的小组是最有效的,超过6人的小组效率会下降。更小的小组允许更多的动手学习和认知参与。虽然临床技能可以在更大的小组中教授,但学习者更喜欢在汇报和复杂场景中进行小组讨论。有效的课程规划应该考虑到可用的资源、模拟的类型和正在教授的材料,并调整小组规模以优化学习成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring Optimal Group Sizes for Learning in Medical Simulation: A Systematic Review.

Objectives: Simulation is an effective teaching method that improves learner competence and confidence. Optimizing group size balances efficiency without sacrificing efficacy. While simulation technology is widely used in medical education, no standard for learner group size exists. This study investigates the optimal group size for simulation, aiming to identify best practices that maximize efficiency and efficacy in learning environments.

Methods: This systematic review adheres to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. A team of emergency medicine educators screened citations and reviewed relevant full-text articles. Inclusion criteria focused on group sizes with the best outcomes. Quality assessment employed the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument approach to evaluate evidence.

Results: Thirty-four articles were identified; 17 were deemed relevant for full-text review. The studies varied in methods, including prospective and retrospective reviews, mixed methods, and randomized controlled trials. Smaller groups improved outcomes, with an ideal size dependent on learning objectives. Five studies suggested groups of up to 4 learners were optimal, with mixed results on the exact number. One study identified 6 as the ideal group size. Debriefing was effective in larger groups, while procedural skills were best taught in groups of 2 to 4 learners.

Conclusion: This review suggests smaller group sizes are more effective for efficiency, knowledge, and confidence. For procedural skills, groups of 2 to 4 are most effective, and effectiveness declines with more than 6 participants. Smaller groups allow for more hands-on learning and cognitive engagement. While clinical skills can be taught in larger groups, learners favor smaller groups for debriefing and complex scenarios. Effective curriculum planning should account for available resources, the type of simulation, and the material being taught, with group sizes adjusted to optimize learning outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信