Charles A Keane, Maheen F Akhter, Benjamin A Sarac, Jeffrey E Janis
{"title":"全国整形外科会议医学生发言人的人口统计、趋势和结果:十年分析。","authors":"Charles A Keane, Maheen F Akhter, Benjamin A Sarac, Jeffrey E Janis","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research is an increasingly substantial criterion for competitive applicants entering the plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) match. Presenting at conferences provides valuable networking opportunities, especially for students from schools without home-integrated PRS programs (no home program [NHP]). We sought to characterize the demographics and outcomes of student presenters at national PRS conferences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Student presenters were obtained from annual meeting programs of 3 national PRS conferences from 2013 to 2022. Data were collected on demographics, presentation frequency, presenters' home and/or research institutions, and match outcomes using Doximity, residency webpages, and LinkedIn. The Pearson χ<sup>2</sup> test, unpaired <i>t</i> test, and the Pearson correlation coefficient were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 745 students delivered 1133 presentations with an approximate 13-fold increase during 10 years. Approximately 61% matriculated into an integrated PRS residency program. NHP presenters comprised 20%, with a 58% match rate, compared with 62% for students who had a home program (HP) (<i>P</i> = 0.41). Among NHP students, 53% researched externally at HP institutions, yielding a 70% match rate, compared with 44% for NHP students researching within their NHP institutions (<i>P</i> = 0.005). Delivering 1 presentation corresponded to a 50% match rate, compared with 76% for multiple presentations (<i>P</i> < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Presenting multiple times at national conferences is associated with a greater PRS match rate. NHP students have a higher likelihood of matching when collaborating with a separate HP institution. Rising volumes of student presentations at PRS conferences suggest that engaging in research, perhaps due to the importance of networking at conferences, may be integral to matching.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 4","pages":"e6648"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11970813/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Demographics, Trends, and Outcomes of Medical Student Presenters at National Plastic Surgery Conferences: A 10-year Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Charles A Keane, Maheen F Akhter, Benjamin A Sarac, Jeffrey E Janis\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006648\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research is an increasingly substantial criterion for competitive applicants entering the plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) match. Presenting at conferences provides valuable networking opportunities, especially for students from schools without home-integrated PRS programs (no home program [NHP]). We sought to characterize the demographics and outcomes of student presenters at national PRS conferences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Student presenters were obtained from annual meeting programs of 3 national PRS conferences from 2013 to 2022. Data were collected on demographics, presentation frequency, presenters' home and/or research institutions, and match outcomes using Doximity, residency webpages, and LinkedIn. The Pearson χ<sup>2</sup> test, unpaired <i>t</i> test, and the Pearson correlation coefficient were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 745 students delivered 1133 presentations with an approximate 13-fold increase during 10 years. Approximately 61% matriculated into an integrated PRS residency program. NHP presenters comprised 20%, with a 58% match rate, compared with 62% for students who had a home program (HP) (<i>P</i> = 0.41). Among NHP students, 53% researched externally at HP institutions, yielding a 70% match rate, compared with 44% for NHP students researching within their NHP institutions (<i>P</i> = 0.005). Delivering 1 presentation corresponded to a 50% match rate, compared with 76% for multiple presentations (<i>P</i> < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Presenting multiple times at national conferences is associated with a greater PRS match rate. NHP students have a higher likelihood of matching when collaborating with a separate HP institution. Rising volumes of student presentations at PRS conferences suggest that engaging in research, perhaps due to the importance of networking at conferences, may be integral to matching.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open\",\"volume\":\"13 4\",\"pages\":\"e6648\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11970813/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006648\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006648","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Demographics, Trends, and Outcomes of Medical Student Presenters at National Plastic Surgery Conferences: A 10-year Analysis.
Background: Research is an increasingly substantial criterion for competitive applicants entering the plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) match. Presenting at conferences provides valuable networking opportunities, especially for students from schools without home-integrated PRS programs (no home program [NHP]). We sought to characterize the demographics and outcomes of student presenters at national PRS conferences.
Methods: Student presenters were obtained from annual meeting programs of 3 national PRS conferences from 2013 to 2022. Data were collected on demographics, presentation frequency, presenters' home and/or research institutions, and match outcomes using Doximity, residency webpages, and LinkedIn. The Pearson χ2 test, unpaired t test, and the Pearson correlation coefficient were performed.
Results: Overall, 745 students delivered 1133 presentations with an approximate 13-fold increase during 10 years. Approximately 61% matriculated into an integrated PRS residency program. NHP presenters comprised 20%, with a 58% match rate, compared with 62% for students who had a home program (HP) (P = 0.41). Among NHP students, 53% researched externally at HP institutions, yielding a 70% match rate, compared with 44% for NHP students researching within their NHP institutions (P = 0.005). Delivering 1 presentation corresponded to a 50% match rate, compared with 76% for multiple presentations (P < 0.0001).
Conclusions: Presenting multiple times at national conferences is associated with a greater PRS match rate. NHP students have a higher likelihood of matching when collaborating with a separate HP institution. Rising volumes of student presentations at PRS conferences suggest that engaging in research, perhaps due to the importance of networking at conferences, may be integral to matching.
期刊介绍:
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.