长期透析患者的容量评估。

IF 10.3 1区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Benjamin Lazarus, Simon J Davies, Kevan R Polkinghorne
{"title":"长期透析患者的容量评估。","authors":"Benjamin Lazarus, Simon J Davies, Kevan R Polkinghorne","doi":"10.1681/ASN.0000000724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Accurate assessment of fluid status is a priority for patients with kidney failure undergoing long-term dialysis. There is wide variation in current volume-related practices between dialysis units and an urgent need to develop better evidence to guide practice. Clinical decisions relating to volume management are implicitly based on assessment of volume status, and there are numerous different but imperfect methods of assessment. Isotope-based dilutions are impractical for clinical use and may not be a gold-standard for patients with kidney failure. Individual trends in body weight and blood pressure have been used as a pragmatic surrogate marker for volume status. Probing the target weight based on blood pressure is still widely practiced but may pose risks related to volume depletion and accelerated loss of residual kidney function. Clinical signs such as elevated jugular venous pressure and leg edema are readily accessible but have poor diagnostic accuracy and wide interobserver variability that limit their reproducibility for volume assessment in clinical trials. Lung ultrasound and bioelectrical impedance analysis have a sound scientific rationale for the assessment of extracellular volume, and are appropriately associated with clinical outcomes, but neither approach has demonstrated convincingly favorable clinical outcomes in clinical trials. Other technologies for volume assessment exist but require further assessment in clinical trials. Advancements in clinical care can be made with existing technologies through comparative effectiveness trials of different fluid management strategies, routine and standardized measurement of volumetric parameters and individual patient preferences, and innovative integration of existing volume assessment methods. A systematic and globally coordinated approach to improving volume assessment and management is required to improve outcomes in patients receiving long-term dialysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":17217,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The American Society of Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Volume Assessment in Patients Undergoing Long-Term Dialysis.\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Lazarus, Simon J Davies, Kevan R Polkinghorne\",\"doi\":\"10.1681/ASN.0000000724\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Accurate assessment of fluid status is a priority for patients with kidney failure undergoing long-term dialysis. There is wide variation in current volume-related practices between dialysis units and an urgent need to develop better evidence to guide practice. Clinical decisions relating to volume management are implicitly based on assessment of volume status, and there are numerous different but imperfect methods of assessment. Isotope-based dilutions are impractical for clinical use and may not be a gold-standard for patients with kidney failure. Individual trends in body weight and blood pressure have been used as a pragmatic surrogate marker for volume status. Probing the target weight based on blood pressure is still widely practiced but may pose risks related to volume depletion and accelerated loss of residual kidney function. Clinical signs such as elevated jugular venous pressure and leg edema are readily accessible but have poor diagnostic accuracy and wide interobserver variability that limit their reproducibility for volume assessment in clinical trials. Lung ultrasound and bioelectrical impedance analysis have a sound scientific rationale for the assessment of extracellular volume, and are appropriately associated with clinical outcomes, but neither approach has demonstrated convincingly favorable clinical outcomes in clinical trials. Other technologies for volume assessment exist but require further assessment in clinical trials. Advancements in clinical care can be made with existing technologies through comparative effectiveness trials of different fluid management strategies, routine and standardized measurement of volumetric parameters and individual patient preferences, and innovative integration of existing volume assessment methods. A systematic and globally coordinated approach to improving volume assessment and management is required to improve outcomes in patients receiving long-term dialysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of The American Society of Nephrology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of The American Society of Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.0000000724\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The American Society of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.0000000724","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:对长期透析的肾功能衰竭患者来说,准确评估体液状态是当务之急。目前透析单位之间的容量相关实践存在很大差异,迫切需要开发更好的证据来指导实践。与体积管理相关的临床决策隐含地基于体积状态的评估,并且有许多不同但不完善的评估方法。同位素稀释法在临床应用中是不切实际的,可能不是肾衰竭患者的金标准。体重和血压的个人趋势已被用作容量状态的实用替代标记。在血压的基础上探测目标体重仍被广泛应用,但可能带来与容量消耗和加速残余肾功能丧失相关的风险。颈静脉压升高和腿部水肿等临床症状很容易获得,但诊断准确性较差,观察者之间的差异很大,这限制了临床试验中容量评估的可重复性。肺超声和生物电阻抗分析在评估细胞外体积方面具有良好的科学依据,并且与临床结果有适当的关联,但在临床试验中,这两种方法都没有显示出令人信服的良好临床结果。其他容量评估技术也存在,但需要在临床试验中进一步评估。通过对不同流体管理策略的比较有效性试验,常规和标准化的容积参数测量和个体患者偏好,以及对现有容积评估方法的创新整合,现有技术可以促进临床护理的进步。需要一种系统和全球协调的方法来改善容量评估和管理,以改善接受长期透析的患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Volume Assessment in Patients Undergoing Long-Term Dialysis.

Abstract: Accurate assessment of fluid status is a priority for patients with kidney failure undergoing long-term dialysis. There is wide variation in current volume-related practices between dialysis units and an urgent need to develop better evidence to guide practice. Clinical decisions relating to volume management are implicitly based on assessment of volume status, and there are numerous different but imperfect methods of assessment. Isotope-based dilutions are impractical for clinical use and may not be a gold-standard for patients with kidney failure. Individual trends in body weight and blood pressure have been used as a pragmatic surrogate marker for volume status. Probing the target weight based on blood pressure is still widely practiced but may pose risks related to volume depletion and accelerated loss of residual kidney function. Clinical signs such as elevated jugular venous pressure and leg edema are readily accessible but have poor diagnostic accuracy and wide interobserver variability that limit their reproducibility for volume assessment in clinical trials. Lung ultrasound and bioelectrical impedance analysis have a sound scientific rationale for the assessment of extracellular volume, and are appropriately associated with clinical outcomes, but neither approach has demonstrated convincingly favorable clinical outcomes in clinical trials. Other technologies for volume assessment exist but require further assessment in clinical trials. Advancements in clinical care can be made with existing technologies through comparative effectiveness trials of different fluid management strategies, routine and standardized measurement of volumetric parameters and individual patient preferences, and innovative integration of existing volume assessment methods. A systematic and globally coordinated approach to improving volume assessment and management is required to improve outcomes in patients receiving long-term dialysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of The American Society of Nephrology
Journal of The American Society of Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
22.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
492
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (JASN) stands as the preeminent kidney journal globally, offering an exceptional synthesis of cutting-edge basic research, clinical epidemiology, meta-analysis, and relevant editorial content. Representing a comprehensive resource, JASN encompasses clinical research, editorials distilling key findings, perspectives, and timely reviews. Editorials are skillfully crafted to elucidate the essential insights of the parent article, while JASN actively encourages the submission of Letters to the Editor discussing recently published articles. The reviews featured in JASN are consistently erudite and comprehensive, providing thorough coverage of respective fields. Since its inception in July 1990, JASN has been a monthly publication. JASN publishes original research reports and editorial content across a spectrum of basic and clinical science relevant to the broad discipline of nephrology. Topics covered include renal cell biology, developmental biology of the kidney, genetics of kidney disease, cell and transport physiology, hemodynamics and vascular regulation, mechanisms of blood pressure regulation, renal immunology, kidney pathology, pathophysiology of kidney diseases, nephrolithiasis, clinical nephrology (including dialysis and transplantation), and hypertension. Furthermore, articles addressing healthcare policy and care delivery issues relevant to nephrology are warmly welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信