减少产前护理开始时间的不平等:R世代研究中的假设干预。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Clair A Enthoven, Jeremy A Labrecque, Hanan El Marroun, Nicole Lucassen, Dionne V Gootjes, Eefje van Vliet, Hilmar H Bijma, Pauline W Jansen
{"title":"减少产前护理开始时间的不平等:R世代研究中的假设干预。","authors":"Clair A Enthoven, Jeremy A Labrecque, Hanan El Marroun, Nicole Lucassen, Dionne V Gootjes, Eefje van Vliet, Hilmar H Bijma, Pauline W Jansen","doi":"10.1111/ppe.70020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Much research has focused on identifying predictors of late antenatal care initiation. Many of these predictors (e.g., young age, migration background, socioeconomic position) are impossible to modify, illustrating the need to explore other interventions.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to investigate inequalities in antenatal care initiation and assess whether early pregnancy recognition may reduce these inequalities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from Generation R were used (N = 4196), a population-based birth cohort study in Rotterdam, The Netherlands. The association of gestational age at pregnancy recognition with the timing of antenatal care initiation and associations of individual and socioeconomic factors with the timing of antenatal care initiation were assessed using linear regression analyses. G-methods were used to estimate the reduction of the inequalities in antenatal care initiation if everyone would have recognised the pregnancy within 6 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants who recognised their pregnancy within 6 weeks (81.7%) had their first antenatal care visit 1.3 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI] -1.6, -0.9) earlier than those who recognised their pregnancy after 6 weeks. All individual and socioeconomic factors were associated with the timing of antenatal care initiation. Modelling a scenario where pregnancy recognition occurred within 6 weeks reduced inequalities in antenatal care initiation timing across several groups: age < 20 versus 30-35 (-0.4 weeks, 95% CI -0.7, -0.2), first-generation migrants versus no migration (-0.1 weeks, 95% CI -0.2, 0.0), unplanned/ambivalent versus planned pregnancies (-0.4 weeks, 95% CI -0.6, -0.2), lower versus higher educational attainment (-0.1 weeks, 95% CI -0.2, 0.0), unemployed versus employed (-0.1 weeks, 95% CI -0.2, 0.0), low versus high household income (-0.1 weeks, 95% CI -0.3, 0.0), renters versus homeowners (-0.1 weeks, 95% CI -0.2, 0.0), and high versus low neighbourhood deprivation (-0.1 weeks, 95% CI -0.2, -0.1).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early recognition of pregnancy may help reduce the impact of socio-economic inequalities in the timely initiation of antenatal care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19698,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reducing Inequalities in Timing of Antenatal Care Initiation: A Hypothetical Intervention in the Generation R Study.\",\"authors\":\"Clair A Enthoven, Jeremy A Labrecque, Hanan El Marroun, Nicole Lucassen, Dionne V Gootjes, Eefje van Vliet, Hilmar H Bijma, Pauline W Jansen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ppe.70020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Much research has focused on identifying predictors of late antenatal care initiation. Many of these predictors (e.g., young age, migration background, socioeconomic position) are impossible to modify, illustrating the need to explore other interventions.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to investigate inequalities in antenatal care initiation and assess whether early pregnancy recognition may reduce these inequalities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from Generation R were used (N = 4196), a population-based birth cohort study in Rotterdam, The Netherlands. The association of gestational age at pregnancy recognition with the timing of antenatal care initiation and associations of individual and socioeconomic factors with the timing of antenatal care initiation were assessed using linear regression analyses. G-methods were used to estimate the reduction of the inequalities in antenatal care initiation if everyone would have recognised the pregnancy within 6 weeks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants who recognised their pregnancy within 6 weeks (81.7%) had their first antenatal care visit 1.3 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI] -1.6, -0.9) earlier than those who recognised their pregnancy after 6 weeks. All individual and socioeconomic factors were associated with the timing of antenatal care initiation. Modelling a scenario where pregnancy recognition occurred within 6 weeks reduced inequalities in antenatal care initiation timing across several groups: age < 20 versus 30-35 (-0.4 weeks, 95% CI -0.7, -0.2), first-generation migrants versus no migration (-0.1 weeks, 95% CI -0.2, 0.0), unplanned/ambivalent versus planned pregnancies (-0.4 weeks, 95% CI -0.6, -0.2), lower versus higher educational attainment (-0.1 weeks, 95% CI -0.2, 0.0), unemployed versus employed (-0.1 weeks, 95% CI -0.2, 0.0), low versus high household income (-0.1 weeks, 95% CI -0.3, 0.0), renters versus homeowners (-0.1 weeks, 95% CI -0.2, 0.0), and high versus low neighbourhood deprivation (-0.1 weeks, 95% CI -0.2, -0.1).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early recognition of pregnancy may help reduce the impact of socio-economic inequalities in the timely initiation of antenatal care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.70020\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.70020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:许多研究集中在确定产前护理开始晚的预测因素。许多这些预测因素(例如,年轻年龄、移民背景、社会经济地位)是不可能改变的,这说明需要探索其他干预措施。目的:本研究旨在调查产前保健开始的不平等,并评估早期妊娠识别是否可以减少这些不平等。方法:采用来自R世代的数据(N = 4196),这是荷兰鹿特丹的一项基于人口的出生队列研究。使用线性回归分析评估妊娠识别时胎龄与产前护理开始时间的关系,以及个体和社会经济因素与产前护理开始时间的关系。如果每个人都能在6周内发现怀孕,则使用g -方法来估计产前保健开始方面不平等的减少。结果:在6周内意识到自己怀孕的参与者(81.7%)比在6周后意识到自己怀孕的参与者早1.3周(95%置信区间[CI] -1.6, -0.9)进行第一次产前检查。所有个人和社会经济因素都与产前护理开始的时间有关。在6周内发现怀孕的情景建模减少了几个群体在产前护理开始时间方面的不平等:年龄结论:早期发现怀孕可能有助于减少社会经济不平等对及时开始产前护理的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reducing Inequalities in Timing of Antenatal Care Initiation: A Hypothetical Intervention in the Generation R Study.

Background: Much research has focused on identifying predictors of late antenatal care initiation. Many of these predictors (e.g., young age, migration background, socioeconomic position) are impossible to modify, illustrating the need to explore other interventions.

Objectives: This study aims to investigate inequalities in antenatal care initiation and assess whether early pregnancy recognition may reduce these inequalities.

Methods: Data from Generation R were used (N = 4196), a population-based birth cohort study in Rotterdam, The Netherlands. The association of gestational age at pregnancy recognition with the timing of antenatal care initiation and associations of individual and socioeconomic factors with the timing of antenatal care initiation were assessed using linear regression analyses. G-methods were used to estimate the reduction of the inequalities in antenatal care initiation if everyone would have recognised the pregnancy within 6 weeks.

Results: Participants who recognised their pregnancy within 6 weeks (81.7%) had their first antenatal care visit 1.3 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI] -1.6, -0.9) earlier than those who recognised their pregnancy after 6 weeks. All individual and socioeconomic factors were associated with the timing of antenatal care initiation. Modelling a scenario where pregnancy recognition occurred within 6 weeks reduced inequalities in antenatal care initiation timing across several groups: age < 20 versus 30-35 (-0.4 weeks, 95% CI -0.7, -0.2), first-generation migrants versus no migration (-0.1 weeks, 95% CI -0.2, 0.0), unplanned/ambivalent versus planned pregnancies (-0.4 weeks, 95% CI -0.6, -0.2), lower versus higher educational attainment (-0.1 weeks, 95% CI -0.2, 0.0), unemployed versus employed (-0.1 weeks, 95% CI -0.2, 0.0), low versus high household income (-0.1 weeks, 95% CI -0.3, 0.0), renters versus homeowners (-0.1 weeks, 95% CI -0.2, 0.0), and high versus low neighbourhood deprivation (-0.1 weeks, 95% CI -0.2, -0.1).

Conclusions: Early recognition of pregnancy may help reduce the impact of socio-economic inequalities in the timely initiation of antenatal care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
84
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology crosses the boundaries between the epidemiologist and the paediatrician, obstetrician or specialist in child health, ensuring that important paediatric and perinatal studies reach those clinicians for whom the results are especially relevant. In addition to original research articles, the Journal also includes commentaries, book reviews and annotations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信