向青少年询问自杀问题与自杀想法的增加无关。

IF 9.2 1区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Laura Hennefield, Katherine R Luking, Rebecca Tillman, Deanna M Barch, Joan L Luby, Renee J Thompson
{"title":"向青少年询问自杀问题与自杀想法的增加无关。","authors":"Laura Hennefield, Katherine R Luking, Rebecca Tillman, Deanna M Barch, Joan L Luby, Renee J Thompson","doi":"10.1016/j.jaac.2025.03.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Rising rates of suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs) in preadolescents make suicide-risk screening in this age group critical to reduce harm. Although screening appears generally safe for youth aged 12 years of age and older, effects in preadolescents remain unknown. This study tested iatrogenic effects of repeated suicide-risk screening in 2 groups of preadolescents (8-12 years of age): a lower-risk group with no prior STBs, and a higher-risk group who had experienced STBs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The Ask-Suicide Screening Questions (ASQ) screener, modified to query suicidal thoughts over the prior week, was administered to 194 preteens from the Pediatric Suicidality Study (PED-SI) over 12 months. PED-SI is a study of preschool-onset depression following children recruited at ages 3 to 6 years for depression and nondepressed peers. Lower-risk preadolescents (n = 68) completed monthly screens, whereas higher-risk preadolescents (n = 124) completed weekly screens, administered remotely via text or e-mail. We examined correlations between screen completion rates and positive screens, changes in positive screens over time, and whether previous screen completion predicted a positive future screen. Bayes factors assessed for meaningfulness of null effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 192 preadolescents (mean age = 10.13 years; 63% boys, 37% girls; 79.2% White, 8.9% Black, 9.9% Multiracial, 2.1% Asian; 7.3%, Hispanic) completed at least one screen. Findings from inferential statistics and supported by Bayes factors indicated no evidence that repeated screening increased suicidal thoughts in either group. In the lower-risk group, positive screens were rare (1.6%), with no significant increases over time. In the higher-risk group, 7% of screens were positive, but this frequent screening did not exacerbate suicidal thoughts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Suicide-risk screening appears to be safe for preadolescents. Clinicians can proceed with screening preadolescents with increased confidence that the benefits outweigh the risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":17186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Asking Preadolescents About Suicide Is Not Associated With Increased Suicidal Thoughts.\",\"authors\":\"Laura Hennefield, Katherine R Luking, Rebecca Tillman, Deanna M Barch, Joan L Luby, Renee J Thompson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaac.2025.03.025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Rising rates of suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs) in preadolescents make suicide-risk screening in this age group critical to reduce harm. Although screening appears generally safe for youth aged 12 years of age and older, effects in preadolescents remain unknown. This study tested iatrogenic effects of repeated suicide-risk screening in 2 groups of preadolescents (8-12 years of age): a lower-risk group with no prior STBs, and a higher-risk group who had experienced STBs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The Ask-Suicide Screening Questions (ASQ) screener, modified to query suicidal thoughts over the prior week, was administered to 194 preteens from the Pediatric Suicidality Study (PED-SI) over 12 months. PED-SI is a study of preschool-onset depression following children recruited at ages 3 to 6 years for depression and nondepressed peers. Lower-risk preadolescents (n = 68) completed monthly screens, whereas higher-risk preadolescents (n = 124) completed weekly screens, administered remotely via text or e-mail. We examined correlations between screen completion rates and positive screens, changes in positive screens over time, and whether previous screen completion predicted a positive future screen. Bayes factors assessed for meaningfulness of null effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 192 preadolescents (mean age = 10.13 years; 63% boys, 37% girls; 79.2% White, 8.9% Black, 9.9% Multiracial, 2.1% Asian; 7.3%, Hispanic) completed at least one screen. Findings from inferential statistics and supported by Bayes factors indicated no evidence that repeated screening increased suicidal thoughts in either group. In the lower-risk group, positive screens were rare (1.6%), with no significant increases over time. In the higher-risk group, 7% of screens were positive, but this frequent screening did not exacerbate suicidal thoughts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Suicide-risk screening appears to be safe for preadolescents. Clinicians can proceed with screening preadolescents with increased confidence that the benefits outweigh the risks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2025.03.025\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2025.03.025","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:自杀想法和行为(STBs)在青春期前的上升率使得在这个年龄段进行自杀风险筛查对减少伤害至关重要。虽然筛查对12岁以上的青少年似乎是安全的,但对青春期前的影响尚不清楚。本研究在两组青少年前(8-12岁)中测试了反复自杀风险筛查的医源性影响:一组是低风险组,之前没有性传播感染,另一组是高风险组,经历过性传播感染。方法:对参加儿科自杀研究(PED-SI)的194名学龄前儿童进行了为期12个月的自杀筛选问题(ASQ)筛选。PED-SI是一项对3-6岁儿童的学龄前抑郁症和非抑郁症的研究。低风险的前青少年(n=68)每月完成一次筛查,而高风险的前青少年(n=124)每周完成一次筛查,通过短信或电子邮件远程管理。我们研究了筛查完成率与积极筛查、积极筛查随时间的变化以及之前的筛查完成率是否预示着未来的积极筛查之间的相关性。贝叶斯因子评估无效效应的意义。结果:192名前青少年(年龄10.13岁;79.2%白人,8.9%黑人,9.9%多种族,2.1%亚洲人;7.3%(西班牙裔)完成了至少一次筛查。推论统计和贝叶斯因素的结果表明,没有证据表明反复筛查会增加两组患者的自杀念头。在低风险组中,阳性筛查很少(1.6%),随着时间的推移没有显著增加。在高风险组中,7%的筛查结果呈阳性,但这种频繁的筛查并没有加剧自杀念头。结论:自杀风险筛查对青春期前儿童是安全的。临床医生可以更有信心地进行青春期前筛查,认为益处大于风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Asking Preadolescents About Suicide Is Not Associated With Increased Suicidal Thoughts.

Objective: Rising rates of suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs) in preadolescents make suicide-risk screening in this age group critical to reduce harm. Although screening appears generally safe for youth aged 12 years of age and older, effects in preadolescents remain unknown. This study tested iatrogenic effects of repeated suicide-risk screening in 2 groups of preadolescents (8-12 years of age): a lower-risk group with no prior STBs, and a higher-risk group who had experienced STBs.

Method: The Ask-Suicide Screening Questions (ASQ) screener, modified to query suicidal thoughts over the prior week, was administered to 194 preteens from the Pediatric Suicidality Study (PED-SI) over 12 months. PED-SI is a study of preschool-onset depression following children recruited at ages 3 to 6 years for depression and nondepressed peers. Lower-risk preadolescents (n = 68) completed monthly screens, whereas higher-risk preadolescents (n = 124) completed weekly screens, administered remotely via text or e-mail. We examined correlations between screen completion rates and positive screens, changes in positive screens over time, and whether previous screen completion predicted a positive future screen. Bayes factors assessed for meaningfulness of null effects.

Results: A total of 192 preadolescents (mean age = 10.13 years; 63% boys, 37% girls; 79.2% White, 8.9% Black, 9.9% Multiracial, 2.1% Asian; 7.3%, Hispanic) completed at least one screen. Findings from inferential statistics and supported by Bayes factors indicated no evidence that repeated screening increased suicidal thoughts in either group. In the lower-risk group, positive screens were rare (1.6%), with no significant increases over time. In the higher-risk group, 7% of screens were positive, but this frequent screening did not exacerbate suicidal thoughts.

Conclusion: Suicide-risk screening appears to be safe for preadolescents. Clinicians can proceed with screening preadolescents with increased confidence that the benefits outweigh the risks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.00
自引率
1.50%
发文量
1383
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (JAACAP) is dedicated to advancing the field of child and adolescent psychiatry through the publication of original research and papers of theoretical, scientific, and clinical significance. Our primary focus is on the mental health of children, adolescents, and families. We welcome unpublished manuscripts that explore various perspectives, ranging from genetic, epidemiological, neurobiological, and psychopathological research, to cognitive, behavioral, psychodynamic, and other psychotherapeutic investigations. We also encourage submissions that delve into parent-child, interpersonal, and family research, as well as clinical and empirical studies conducted in inpatient, outpatient, consultation-liaison, and school-based settings. In addition to publishing research, we aim to promote the well-being of children and families by featuring scholarly papers on topics such as health policy, legislation, advocacy, culture, society, and service provision in relation to mental health. At JAACAP, we strive to foster collaboration and dialogue among researchers, clinicians, and policy-makers in order to enhance our understanding and approach to child and adolescent mental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信