手术创新、统计分析与专业文化:胸腺切除术治疗重症肌无力,1936-2016。

IF 0.9 2区 哲学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Mark W Weatherall
{"title":"手术创新、统计分析与专业文化:胸腺切除术治疗重症肌无力,1936-2016。","authors":"Mark W Weatherall","doi":"10.1017/mdh.2024.35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper provides an account of a specific operation - the removal of the thymus gland (thymectomy) to treat the rare neurological condition myasthenia gravis - from its first performance in 1936, by the American surgeon Alfred Blalock, to the publication in 2016 of an international multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) of the technique. Thymectomy was the subject of a transatlantic controversy in the 1950s, in which the main players were the English surgeon Geoffrey Keynes, and American neurologists and surgeons from New York, Boston, and the Mayo Clinic. The resolution of this controversy involved the use of increasingly sophisticated statistical techniques, but also crucially other influences including the social transformation of thoracic surgery, and competition between the leading American centres. The consensus achieved after this controversy was challenged in the late 1970s, eventually prompting the implementation of a trial acceptable to twenty-first-century evidence-based medicine. This account will demonstrate that surgical innovation in the period covered required increasing attention to the statistical basis of patient selection and outcome evaluation; that the processes of technical innovation cannot be regarded as separate from developments in the professional culture of surgery, and that one of the consequences of these changes has been the gradual eclipse of the prestigious autonomous surgeon.</p>","PeriodicalId":18275,"journal":{"name":"Medical History","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical innovation, statistical analysis, and professional culture: thymectomy for myasthenia gravis, 1936-2016.\",\"authors\":\"Mark W Weatherall\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/mdh.2024.35\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This paper provides an account of a specific operation - the removal of the thymus gland (thymectomy) to treat the rare neurological condition myasthenia gravis - from its first performance in 1936, by the American surgeon Alfred Blalock, to the publication in 2016 of an international multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) of the technique. Thymectomy was the subject of a transatlantic controversy in the 1950s, in which the main players were the English surgeon Geoffrey Keynes, and American neurologists and surgeons from New York, Boston, and the Mayo Clinic. The resolution of this controversy involved the use of increasingly sophisticated statistical techniques, but also crucially other influences including the social transformation of thoracic surgery, and competition between the leading American centres. The consensus achieved after this controversy was challenged in the late 1970s, eventually prompting the implementation of a trial acceptable to twenty-first-century evidence-based medicine. This account will demonstrate that surgical innovation in the period covered required increasing attention to the statistical basis of patient selection and outcome evaluation; that the processes of technical innovation cannot be regarded as separate from developments in the professional culture of surgery, and that one of the consequences of these changes has been the gradual eclipse of the prestigious autonomous surgeon.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical History\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/mdh.2024.35\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical History","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/mdh.2024.35","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了一种特殊的手术——切除胸腺(胸腺切除术)来治疗罕见的神经系统疾病重症肌无力——从1936年美国外科医生阿尔弗雷德·布拉洛克(Alfred Blalock)的首次手术,到2016年该技术的国际多中心随机对照试验(RCT)的发表。胸腺切除术是20世纪50年代大西洋两岸争议的主题,主要参与者是英国外科医生杰弗里·凯恩斯(Geoffrey Keynes),以及来自纽约、波士顿和梅奥诊所(Mayo Clinic)的美国神经科医生和外科医生。这一争议的解决涉及到越来越复杂的统计技术的使用,但也有其他重要的影响,包括胸外科的社会转型,以及美国领先中心之间的竞争。在这一争议之后达成的共识在20世纪70年代末受到挑战,最终促使实施了21世纪循证医学可接受的试验。这篇文章将证明,在这一时期的外科创新需要越来越多地关注患者选择和结果评估的统计基础;技术革新的过程不能与外科专业文化的发展分开看待,这些变化的后果之一是声望卓著的自主外科医生的逐渐消失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surgical innovation, statistical analysis, and professional culture: thymectomy for myasthenia gravis, 1936-2016.

This paper provides an account of a specific operation - the removal of the thymus gland (thymectomy) to treat the rare neurological condition myasthenia gravis - from its first performance in 1936, by the American surgeon Alfred Blalock, to the publication in 2016 of an international multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) of the technique. Thymectomy was the subject of a transatlantic controversy in the 1950s, in which the main players were the English surgeon Geoffrey Keynes, and American neurologists and surgeons from New York, Boston, and the Mayo Clinic. The resolution of this controversy involved the use of increasingly sophisticated statistical techniques, but also crucially other influences including the social transformation of thoracic surgery, and competition between the leading American centres. The consensus achieved after this controversy was challenged in the late 1970s, eventually prompting the implementation of a trial acceptable to twenty-first-century evidence-based medicine. This account will demonstrate that surgical innovation in the period covered required increasing attention to the statistical basis of patient selection and outcome evaluation; that the processes of technical innovation cannot be regarded as separate from developments in the professional culture of surgery, and that one of the consequences of these changes has been the gradual eclipse of the prestigious autonomous surgeon.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical History
Medical History 医学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical History is a refereed journal devoted to all aspects of the history of medicine and health, with the goal of broadening and deepening the understanding of the field, in the widest sense, by historical studies of the highest quality. It is also the journal of the European Association for the History of Medicine and Health. The membership of the Editorial Board, which includes senior members of the EAHMH, reflects the commitment to the finest international standards in refereeing of submitted papers and the reviewing of books. The journal publishes in English, but welcomes submissions from scholars for whom English is not a first language; language and copy-editing assistance will be provided wherever possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信