脑外伤患者的自杀和自我伤害:风险、保护因素和应对机制。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Amelia J Hicks, Kiara Corso, Jai Carmichael, Kate R Gould, Lisa Johnston, Gershon Spitz, Jennie L Ponsford
{"title":"脑外伤患者的自杀和自我伤害:风险、保护因素和应对机制。","authors":"Amelia J Hicks, Kiara Corso, Jai Carmichael, Kate R Gould, Lisa Johnston, Gershon Spitz, Jennie L Ponsford","doi":"10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20240206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The authors examined lived experience perspectives of suicidality and nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), risk and protective factors, and methods of coping.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A record review of suicide risk assessments was completed as part of routine clinical risk management for a research study. The authors used a semistructured interview approach developed from existing clinical tools and extracted data from assessment records by using content analysis to categorize common responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were extracted from records of 68 participants (mean±SD age=45.9±14.4 years; 82% male) with a history of moderate-to-severe TBI (mean=10.7±9.1 years after TBI). Most participants (86%) were currently experiencing suicidal thoughts, and 50% had experienced NSSI thoughts in their lifetime. Fifteen participants (28%) reported a lifetime suicide attempt. The most common protective factors for suicidal ideation reported by participants were support from family (59%) and the personal attributes of openness and being optimistic (49%). The most common risk factors were emotional distress or presence of a psychiatric diagnosis (62%), TBI sequelae (such as fatigue; 49%), work-related stress (43%), and lack of family support (34%). Engaging with health professionals (62%) and seeking support from family (57%) were the most common healthy coping strategies, whereas substance use (38%) and social withdrawal (32%) were the most common unhealthy coping strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of this study provide detailed insights into the lived experiences of suicidality and NSSI after moderate-to-severe TBI, how survivors conceptualize factors that may increase or attenuate risk, and common coping strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16559,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences","volume":" ","pages":"appineuropsych20240206"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Suicidality and Self-Harm Among Individuals With Traumatic Brain Injury: Risk and Protective Factors and Coping Mechanisms.\",\"authors\":\"Amelia J Hicks, Kiara Corso, Jai Carmichael, Kate R Gould, Lisa Johnston, Gershon Spitz, Jennie L Ponsford\",\"doi\":\"10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20240206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The authors examined lived experience perspectives of suicidality and nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), risk and protective factors, and methods of coping.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A record review of suicide risk assessments was completed as part of routine clinical risk management for a research study. The authors used a semistructured interview approach developed from existing clinical tools and extracted data from assessment records by using content analysis to categorize common responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were extracted from records of 68 participants (mean±SD age=45.9±14.4 years; 82% male) with a history of moderate-to-severe TBI (mean=10.7±9.1 years after TBI). Most participants (86%) were currently experiencing suicidal thoughts, and 50% had experienced NSSI thoughts in their lifetime. Fifteen participants (28%) reported a lifetime suicide attempt. The most common protective factors for suicidal ideation reported by participants were support from family (59%) and the personal attributes of openness and being optimistic (49%). The most common risk factors were emotional distress or presence of a psychiatric diagnosis (62%), TBI sequelae (such as fatigue; 49%), work-related stress (43%), and lack of family support (34%). Engaging with health professionals (62%) and seeking support from family (57%) were the most common healthy coping strategies, whereas substance use (38%) and social withdrawal (32%) were the most common unhealthy coping strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of this study provide detailed insights into the lived experiences of suicidality and NSSI after moderate-to-severe TBI, how survivors conceptualize factors that may increase or attenuate risk, and common coping strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16559,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"appineuropsych20240206\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20240206\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20240206","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨中重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后自杀和非自杀性自伤(NSSI)的生活经历、风险和保护因素以及应对方法。方法:作为一项研究的常规临床风险管理的一部分,完成了自杀风险评估的记录回顾。作者使用了从现有临床工具发展而来的半结构化访谈方法,并通过内容分析从评估记录中提取数据,对常见的回答进行分类。结果:资料来自68名参与者的记录(平均±SD年龄=45.9±14.4岁;82%男性),有中重度脑外伤史(脑外伤后平均10.7±9.1年)。大多数参与者(86%)目前有自杀念头,50%的人一生中有过自伤的念头。15名参与者(28%)报告了一生的自杀企图。参与者报告的自杀意念最常见的保护因素是来自家庭的支持(59%)和开放和乐观的个人属性(49%)。最常见的危险因素是情绪困扰或精神诊断(62%)、创伤性脑损伤后遗症(如疲劳;49%)、工作压力(43%)和缺乏家庭支持(34%)。与卫生专业人员接触(62%)和寻求家庭支持(57%)是最常见的健康应对策略,而药物使用(38%)和社交退缩(32%)是最常见的不健康应对策略。结论:本研究的发现为中重度脑外伤后自杀和自伤的生活经历、幸存者如何理解可能增加或减轻风险的因素以及常见的应对策略提供了详细的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Suicidality and Self-Harm Among Individuals With Traumatic Brain Injury: Risk and Protective Factors and Coping Mechanisms.

Objective: The authors examined lived experience perspectives of suicidality and nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), risk and protective factors, and methods of coping.

Methods: A record review of suicide risk assessments was completed as part of routine clinical risk management for a research study. The authors used a semistructured interview approach developed from existing clinical tools and extracted data from assessment records by using content analysis to categorize common responses.

Results: Data were extracted from records of 68 participants (mean±SD age=45.9±14.4 years; 82% male) with a history of moderate-to-severe TBI (mean=10.7±9.1 years after TBI). Most participants (86%) were currently experiencing suicidal thoughts, and 50% had experienced NSSI thoughts in their lifetime. Fifteen participants (28%) reported a lifetime suicide attempt. The most common protective factors for suicidal ideation reported by participants were support from family (59%) and the personal attributes of openness and being optimistic (49%). The most common risk factors were emotional distress or presence of a psychiatric diagnosis (62%), TBI sequelae (such as fatigue; 49%), work-related stress (43%), and lack of family support (34%). Engaging with health professionals (62%) and seeking support from family (57%) were the most common healthy coping strategies, whereas substance use (38%) and social withdrawal (32%) were the most common unhealthy coping strategies.

Conclusions: The findings of this study provide detailed insights into the lived experiences of suicidality and NSSI after moderate-to-severe TBI, how survivors conceptualize factors that may increase or attenuate risk, and common coping strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.40%
发文量
67
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official Journal of the American Neuropsychiatric Association, the premier North American organization of clinicians, scientists, and educators specializing in behavioral neurology & neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, and the clinical neurosciences, the Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences (JNCN) aims to publish works that advance the science of brain-behavior relationships, the care of persons and families affected by neurodevelopmental, acquired neurological, and neurodegenerative conditions, and education and training in behavioral neurology & neuropsychiatry. JNCN publishes peer-reviewed articles on the cognitive, emotional, and behavioral manifestations of neurological conditions, the structural and functional neuroanatomy of idiopathic psychiatric disorders, and the clinical and educational applications and public health implications of scientific advances in these areas. The Journal features systematic reviews and meta-analyses, narrative reviews, original research articles, scholarly considerations of treatment and educational challenges in behavioral neurology & neuropsychiatry, analyses and commentaries on advances and emerging trends in the field, international perspectives on neuropsychiatry, opinions and introspections, case reports that inform on the structural and functional bases of neuropsychiatric conditions, and classic pieces from the field’s rich history.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信