意大利大学医院重症监护病房入院时的定植:危险因素和临床意义

IF 0.9 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Carlo Pallotto, Giovanni Genga, Elisabetta Svizzeretto, Andrea Tommasi, Fabio Mencarelli, Eleonora Natali, Cristina Todisco, Anna Gidari, Daniela Francisci
{"title":"意大利大学医院重症监护病房入院时的定植:危险因素和临床意义","authors":"Carlo Pallotto, Giovanni Genga, Elisabetta Svizzeretto, Andrea Tommasi, Fabio Mencarelli, Eleonora Natali, Cristina Todisco, Anna Gidari, Daniela Francisci","doi":"10.1177/17571774251330450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antibiotic resistance represents a great concern worldwide with increasing related morbidity and mortality. Multidrug resistant microorganisms are going to be detected more and more frequently even in the community setting. Therefore, patients could be colonised even at the admission to the hospital.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to evaluate colonisation at admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) and the acquisition of new colonisation during the ICU stay and the related risk factors. Secondly, healthcare-associated infections and surgical prophylaxis efficacy were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective observational study. All the patients admitted to the post-cardiosurgical ICU from 01 January to 30 June 2021 were enrolled. Colonisation was evaluated by rectal and nasal swab at admission or at the pre-hospitalisation visit and then every 7 days during the hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>80 out of 183 patients were colonised at admission, 46 by non-susceptible microorganisms (NSM). An antibiotic treatment in the previous 3 months was identified as risk factor for NSM colonisation. According to these isolates, about one third of the surgical prophylaxis could be ineffective. During the hospital stay, 36 patients acquired new colonisations; antibiotic treatment and length of hospital stay were recognised as risk factors. At least one (≥1) healthcare-associated infection (HAI) was detected in 54 patients (68 episodes); HAIs were significantly more frequent in the colonised patients. Moreover, in 35/68 HAIs aetiology was consistent with the colonisation.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Knowing patients' colonisations could be fundamental to tailor antibiotic treatments and prophylaxis and to avoid NSM spread.</p>","PeriodicalId":16094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"17571774251330450"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11966634/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Colonisation at admission to an intensive care unit in an Italian University Hospital: Risk factors and clinical implications.\",\"authors\":\"Carlo Pallotto, Giovanni Genga, Elisabetta Svizzeretto, Andrea Tommasi, Fabio Mencarelli, Eleonora Natali, Cristina Todisco, Anna Gidari, Daniela Francisci\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17571774251330450\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antibiotic resistance represents a great concern worldwide with increasing related morbidity and mortality. Multidrug resistant microorganisms are going to be detected more and more frequently even in the community setting. Therefore, patients could be colonised even at the admission to the hospital.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to evaluate colonisation at admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) and the acquisition of new colonisation during the ICU stay and the related risk factors. Secondly, healthcare-associated infections and surgical prophylaxis efficacy were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective observational study. All the patients admitted to the post-cardiosurgical ICU from 01 January to 30 June 2021 were enrolled. Colonisation was evaluated by rectal and nasal swab at admission or at the pre-hospitalisation visit and then every 7 days during the hospital stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>80 out of 183 patients were colonised at admission, 46 by non-susceptible microorganisms (NSM). An antibiotic treatment in the previous 3 months was identified as risk factor for NSM colonisation. According to these isolates, about one third of the surgical prophylaxis could be ineffective. During the hospital stay, 36 patients acquired new colonisations; antibiotic treatment and length of hospital stay were recognised as risk factors. At least one (≥1) healthcare-associated infection (HAI) was detected in 54 patients (68 episodes); HAIs were significantly more frequent in the colonised patients. Moreover, in 35/68 HAIs aetiology was consistent with the colonisation.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Knowing patients' colonisations could be fundamental to tailor antibiotic treatments and prophylaxis and to avoid NSM spread.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Infection Prevention\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17571774251330450\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11966634/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Infection Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17571774251330450\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17571774251330450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:抗生素耐药性是世界范围内引起高度关注的问题,相关发病率和死亡率不断上升。即使在社区环境中,也将越来越频繁地发现耐多药微生物。因此,患者甚至在入院时就可以定植。目的:本研究的目的是评估重症监护病房(ICU)入院时的菌落和ICU住院期间新菌落的获得及其相关危险因素。其次,还评估了医疗保健相关感染和手术预防效果。方法:回顾性观察研究。纳入2021年1月1日至6月30日入住心脏手术后ICU的所有患者。在入院时或住院前访问时,通过直肠和鼻腔拭子评估定植,然后在住院期间每7天评估一次。结果:183例患者入院时定植80例,其中46例为非敏感微生物(NSM)。前3个月的抗生素治疗被确定为NSM定植的危险因素。根据这些分离株,大约三分之一的手术预防可能无效。住院期间,36例患者获得新的菌落;抗生素治疗和住院时间被认为是危险因素。54例患者(68次发作)中检出至少1例(≥1例)卫生保健相关感染(HAI);在殖民地患者中,HAIs明显更频繁。此外,35/68例HAIs的病因学与定植一致。讨论:了解患者的菌落可能是定制抗生素治疗和预防以及避免NSM传播的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Colonisation at admission to an intensive care unit in an Italian University Hospital: Risk factors and clinical implications.

Background: Antibiotic resistance represents a great concern worldwide with increasing related morbidity and mortality. Multidrug resistant microorganisms are going to be detected more and more frequently even in the community setting. Therefore, patients could be colonised even at the admission to the hospital.

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate colonisation at admission to an intensive care unit (ICU) and the acquisition of new colonisation during the ICU stay and the related risk factors. Secondly, healthcare-associated infections and surgical prophylaxis efficacy were also evaluated.

Methods: Retrospective observational study. All the patients admitted to the post-cardiosurgical ICU from 01 January to 30 June 2021 were enrolled. Colonisation was evaluated by rectal and nasal swab at admission or at the pre-hospitalisation visit and then every 7 days during the hospital stay.

Results: 80 out of 183 patients were colonised at admission, 46 by non-susceptible microorganisms (NSM). An antibiotic treatment in the previous 3 months was identified as risk factor for NSM colonisation. According to these isolates, about one third of the surgical prophylaxis could be ineffective. During the hospital stay, 36 patients acquired new colonisations; antibiotic treatment and length of hospital stay were recognised as risk factors. At least one (≥1) healthcare-associated infection (HAI) was detected in 54 patients (68 episodes); HAIs were significantly more frequent in the colonised patients. Moreover, in 35/68 HAIs aetiology was consistent with the colonisation.

Discussion: Knowing patients' colonisations could be fundamental to tailor antibiotic treatments and prophylaxis and to avoid NSM spread.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Infection Prevention
Journal of Infection Prevention Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Journal of Infection Prevention is the professional publication of the Infection Prevention Society. The aim of the journal is to advance the evidence base in infection prevention and control, and to provide a publishing platform for all health professionals interested in this field of practice. Journal of Infection Prevention is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed publication containing a wide range of articles: ·Original primary research studies ·Qualitative and quantitative studies ·Reviews of the evidence on various topics ·Practice development project reports ·Guidelines for practice ·Case studies ·Overviews of infectious diseases and their causative organisms ·Audit and surveillance studies/projects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信