间歇冲刺训练对高强度跑步者跑步经济性和腿部僵硬度的影响。

Q1 Health Professions
International journal of exercise science Pub Date : 2025-03-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.70252/SKPQ5840
Drew Thibault, Connor Ellis, Garrett Toms, Allison Schaefer, David A Titcomb
{"title":"间歇冲刺训练对高强度跑步者跑步经济性和腿部僵硬度的影响。","authors":"Drew Thibault, Connor Ellis, Garrett Toms, Allison Schaefer, David A Titcomb","doi":"10.70252/SKPQ5840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of once-weekly sprint training on running economy (RE) and leg stiffness (LS) in highly trained athletes (12 M, 13 F, mean age 24.8 ± 7.1). Participants were recruited based on weekly exercise volume (minimum 4 hours) and athletic ability calculated by World Athletics score (minimum 500). RE and LS were evaluated at three velocities before and after 12 weeks of once-weekly sprint training. On average, participants experienced a non-statistically significant improvement in RE (average percent change -2.0 ± 5.6%, -1.2 ± 5.2%, -1.0 ± 4.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.389, 0.269, 0.272, Cohen's d = 0.21, 0.18, 0.17), and a statistically significant improvement in LS (12.59 ± 9.2%, 11.49 ± 10.9%, 15.67 ± 11.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.019, 0.027, 0.011, Cohen's d = 0.61, 0.56, 0.68) at the three running velocities. Interestingly, the improvement in LS was significantly influenced by a reduction in vertical displacement during the gait cycle (-17.7 ± 11.7%, -15.7 ± 12.2, -17.3 ± 13.4%, <i>p</i> < 0.001, = 0.001, = 0.001, Cohen's d = 1.10, 0.93, 0.91). Changes in RE and LS were significantly different when data were analyzed by exercise volume during the intervention period (p < 0.05). The present study demonstrates that LS, independently shown to improve performance and RE, can be improved by sprint training in highly trained athletes. Additionally, the average participant improvement in RE suggests that sprint training may lead to statistically significant improvement with an increase in participants and tighter participant training control.</p>","PeriodicalId":14171,"journal":{"name":"International journal of exercise science","volume":"18 5","pages":"290-305"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11970412/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effects of Intermittent Sprint Training on Running Economy and Leg Stiffness in Highly Trained Runners.\",\"authors\":\"Drew Thibault, Connor Ellis, Garrett Toms, Allison Schaefer, David A Titcomb\",\"doi\":\"10.70252/SKPQ5840\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of once-weekly sprint training on running economy (RE) and leg stiffness (LS) in highly trained athletes (12 M, 13 F, mean age 24.8 ± 7.1). Participants were recruited based on weekly exercise volume (minimum 4 hours) and athletic ability calculated by World Athletics score (minimum 500). RE and LS were evaluated at three velocities before and after 12 weeks of once-weekly sprint training. On average, participants experienced a non-statistically significant improvement in RE (average percent change -2.0 ± 5.6%, -1.2 ± 5.2%, -1.0 ± 4.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.389, 0.269, 0.272, Cohen's d = 0.21, 0.18, 0.17), and a statistically significant improvement in LS (12.59 ± 9.2%, 11.49 ± 10.9%, 15.67 ± 11.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.019, 0.027, 0.011, Cohen's d = 0.61, 0.56, 0.68) at the three running velocities. Interestingly, the improvement in LS was significantly influenced by a reduction in vertical displacement during the gait cycle (-17.7 ± 11.7%, -15.7 ± 12.2, -17.3 ± 13.4%, <i>p</i> < 0.001, = 0.001, = 0.001, Cohen's d = 1.10, 0.93, 0.91). Changes in RE and LS were significantly different when data were analyzed by exercise volume during the intervention period (p < 0.05). The present study demonstrates that LS, independently shown to improve performance and RE, can be improved by sprint training in highly trained athletes. Additionally, the average participant improvement in RE suggests that sprint training may lead to statistically significant improvement with an increase in participants and tighter participant training control.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of exercise science\",\"volume\":\"18 5\",\"pages\":\"290-305\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11970412/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of exercise science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.70252/SKPQ5840\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of exercise science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.70252/SKPQ5840","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是评估每周一次短跑训练对高训练运动员(12米,13米,平均年龄24.8±7.1)的跑步经济性(RE)和腿部僵硬度(LS)的影响。参与者根据每周运动量(最少4小时)和世界田径成绩计算的运动能力(最少500分)招募。在12周的每周一次冲刺训练之前和之后,以三种速度评估RE和LS。平均而言,在三种跑步速度下,参与者的RE改善无统计学意义(平均百分比变化-2.0±5.6%,-1.2±5.2%,-1.0±4.6%,p = 0.389, 0.269, 0.272, Cohen’s d = 0.21, 0.18, 0.17), LS改善有统计学意义(12.59±9.2%,11.49±10.9%,15.67±11.2%,p = 0.019, 0.027, 0.011, Cohen’s d = 0.61, 0.56, 0.68)。有趣的是,步态周期中垂直位移的减少显著影响了LS的改善(-17.7±11.7%,-15.7±12.2,-17.3±13.4%,p < 0.001, = 0.001, = 0.001, Cohen’s d = 1.10, 0.93, 0.91)。以运动量分析干预期间RE、LS的变化差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。本研究表明,在训练有素的运动员中,LS可以通过短跑训练来提高成绩和RE。此外,平均参与者在RE方面的改善表明,随着参与者的增加和更严格的参与者训练控制,冲刺训练可能会导致统计学上显著的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effects of Intermittent Sprint Training on Running Economy and Leg Stiffness in Highly Trained Runners.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of once-weekly sprint training on running economy (RE) and leg stiffness (LS) in highly trained athletes (12 M, 13 F, mean age 24.8 ± 7.1). Participants were recruited based on weekly exercise volume (minimum 4 hours) and athletic ability calculated by World Athletics score (minimum 500). RE and LS were evaluated at three velocities before and after 12 weeks of once-weekly sprint training. On average, participants experienced a non-statistically significant improvement in RE (average percent change -2.0 ± 5.6%, -1.2 ± 5.2%, -1.0 ± 4.6%, p = 0.389, 0.269, 0.272, Cohen's d = 0.21, 0.18, 0.17), and a statistically significant improvement in LS (12.59 ± 9.2%, 11.49 ± 10.9%, 15.67 ± 11.2%, p = 0.019, 0.027, 0.011, Cohen's d = 0.61, 0.56, 0.68) at the three running velocities. Interestingly, the improvement in LS was significantly influenced by a reduction in vertical displacement during the gait cycle (-17.7 ± 11.7%, -15.7 ± 12.2, -17.3 ± 13.4%, p < 0.001, = 0.001, = 0.001, Cohen's d = 1.10, 0.93, 0.91). Changes in RE and LS were significantly different when data were analyzed by exercise volume during the intervention period (p < 0.05). The present study demonstrates that LS, independently shown to improve performance and RE, can be improved by sprint training in highly trained athletes. Additionally, the average participant improvement in RE suggests that sprint training may lead to statistically significant improvement with an increase in participants and tighter participant training control.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of exercise science
International journal of exercise science Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信