IF 3.1 3区 工程技术 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Cognitive Neurodynamics Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-04 DOI:10.1007/s11571-025-10242-0
Subashis Karmakar, Tandra Pal, Chiranjib Koley
{"title":"Detection of cognitive load during computer-aided education using infrared sensors.","authors":"Subashis Karmakar, Tandra Pal, Chiranjib Koley","doi":"10.1007/s11571-025-10242-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Technology integration in modern education has transformed traditional teaching-learning methods, but maintaining student attentiveness during computer-aided activities remains challenging. Neuroimaging advancements provide valuable insights into cognitive processes. This study measures cognitive load during computer-aided education. We have collected functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) brain signals while subjects perform mental tasks and rest. Three datasets have been considered to evaluate the performance of the proposed model. The first two datasets are open-access, and we prepare the third dataset by collecting fNIRS brain signals from 14 healthy subjects. Two feature extraction techniques are proposed: manual and automatic based on wavelet scattering transform (WST). A one dimensional convolutional neural network (1D CNN) is also proposed to automatically extract features through feature engineering and classification. For comparison, four machine learning classifiers, linear discriminant analysis (LDA), Naive Bayes (NB), k-nearest neighbors (KNN) and support vector machine (SVM), are also considered. Classification performance is evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall and F1-score across all datasets. Computational cost, i.e., the CPU time and memory utilization for extracting the features and testing the classifiers, is also evaluated. The results suggest that when considering four classifiers across three datasets and comparing among the manual and the WST-based feature extraction methods, the average performance of 1D CNN is superior in terms of classification accuracy (1.16 times higher), precision (1.10 times higher), recall (1.10 times higher) and F1-score (1.09 times higher). However, the CPU time and memory utilization for 1D CNN are significantly higher, 10.09 and 14.70 times, respectively. In comparison to four state-of-the-art deep learning models, the proposed 1D CNN also shows best classification accuracy (92.99%). The analysis of the results shows that identifying cognitive load, SVM with Gaussian kernel function on WST based methods, provides satisfactory classification performance with significantly less CPU time and memory utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":10500,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Neurodynamics","volume":"19 1","pages":"58"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11971117/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Neurodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-025-10242-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现代教育中的技术整合改变了传统的教学方法,但在计算机辅助活动中保持学生的注意力仍然具有挑战性。神经影像学的进步为认知过程提供了宝贵的见解。本研究测量计算机辅助教学过程中的认知负荷。我们收集了受试者执行心理任务和休息时的功能性近红外光谱(fNIRS)脑信号。为评估所建模型的性能,我们考虑了三个数据集。前两个数据集是开放获取的,我们通过收集 14 名健康受试者的 fNIRS 脑信号来准备第三个数据集。我们提出了两种特征提取技术:手动提取和基于小波散射变换(WST)的自动提取。此外,还提出了一种一维卷积神经网络(1D CNN),通过特征工程和分类自动提取特征。为了进行比较,还考虑了四种机器学习分类器,即线性判别分析(LDA)、奈夫贝叶斯(NB)、k-近邻(KNN)和支持向量机(SVM)。使用所有数据集的准确度、精确度、召回率和 F1 分数来评估分类性能。此外,还评估了计算成本,即提取特征和测试分类器所需的 CPU 时间和内存利用率。结果表明,考虑到三个数据集的四个分类器,并比较人工和基于 WST 的特征提取方法,1D CNN 的平均性能在分类准确率(高 1.16 倍)、精确度(高 1.10 倍)、召回率(高 1.10 倍)和 F1 分数(高 1.09 倍)方面更胜一筹。不过,一维 CNN 的 CPU 时间和内存利用率明显更高,分别为 10.09 倍和 14.70 倍。与四种最先进的深度学习模型相比,所提出的一维 CNN 还显示出最佳的分类准确率(92.99%)。结果分析表明,在基于 WST 的方法上识别认知负荷、具有高斯核函数的 SVM,能提供令人满意的分类性能,CPU 时间和内存利用率也明显降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Detection of cognitive load during computer-aided education using infrared sensors.

Technology integration in modern education has transformed traditional teaching-learning methods, but maintaining student attentiveness during computer-aided activities remains challenging. Neuroimaging advancements provide valuable insights into cognitive processes. This study measures cognitive load during computer-aided education. We have collected functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) brain signals while subjects perform mental tasks and rest. Three datasets have been considered to evaluate the performance of the proposed model. The first two datasets are open-access, and we prepare the third dataset by collecting fNIRS brain signals from 14 healthy subjects. Two feature extraction techniques are proposed: manual and automatic based on wavelet scattering transform (WST). A one dimensional convolutional neural network (1D CNN) is also proposed to automatically extract features through feature engineering and classification. For comparison, four machine learning classifiers, linear discriminant analysis (LDA), Naive Bayes (NB), k-nearest neighbors (KNN) and support vector machine (SVM), are also considered. Classification performance is evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall and F1-score across all datasets. Computational cost, i.e., the CPU time and memory utilization for extracting the features and testing the classifiers, is also evaluated. The results suggest that when considering four classifiers across three datasets and comparing among the manual and the WST-based feature extraction methods, the average performance of 1D CNN is superior in terms of classification accuracy (1.16 times higher), precision (1.10 times higher), recall (1.10 times higher) and F1-score (1.09 times higher). However, the CPU time and memory utilization for 1D CNN are significantly higher, 10.09 and 14.70 times, respectively. In comparison to four state-of-the-art deep learning models, the proposed 1D CNN also shows best classification accuracy (92.99%). The analysis of the results shows that identifying cognitive load, SVM with Gaussian kernel function on WST based methods, provides satisfactory classification performance with significantly less CPU time and memory utilization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Neurodynamics
Cognitive Neurodynamics 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
18.90%
发文量
140
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Cognitive Neurodynamics provides a unique forum of communication and cooperation for scientists and engineers working in the field of cognitive neurodynamics, intelligent science and applications, bridging the gap between theory and application, without any preference for pure theoretical, experimental or computational models. The emphasis is to publish original models of cognitive neurodynamics, novel computational theories and experimental results. In particular, intelligent science inspired by cognitive neuroscience and neurodynamics is also very welcome. The scope of Cognitive Neurodynamics covers cognitive neuroscience, neural computation based on dynamics, computer science, intelligent science as well as their interdisciplinary applications in the natural and engineering sciences. Papers that are appropriate for non-specialist readers are encouraged. 1. There is no page limit for manuscripts submitted to Cognitive Neurodynamics. Research papers should clearly represent an important advance of especially broad interest to researchers and technologists in neuroscience, biophysics, BCI, neural computer and intelligent robotics. 2. Cognitive Neurodynamics also welcomes brief communications: short papers reporting results that are of genuinely broad interest but that for one reason and another do not make a sufficiently complete story to justify a full article publication. Brief Communications should consist of approximately four manuscript pages. 3. Cognitive Neurodynamics publishes review articles in which a specific field is reviewed through an exhaustive literature survey. There are no restrictions on the number of pages. Review articles are usually invited, but submitted reviews will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信