电刺激下颌骨再生植入物的安全性和初步疗效:大型动物模型的初步研究。

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Peer W Kämmerer, Nadja Engel, Rainer Bader, Vivien Engel, Bernhard Frerich, Diana Heimes, Justin Kröger, Laura Lembcke, Franz Plocksties, Hendrikje Raben, Ursula van Rienen, Armin Springer, Dirk Timmermann, Julius Zimmermann, Michael Dau
{"title":"电刺激下颌骨再生植入物的安全性和初步疗效:大型动物模型的初步研究。","authors":"Peer W Kämmerer, Nadja Engel, Rainer Bader, Vivien Engel, Bernhard Frerich, Diana Heimes, Justin Kröger, Laura Lembcke, Franz Plocksties, Hendrikje Raben, Ursula van Rienen, Armin Springer, Dirk Timmermann, Julius Zimmermann, Michael Dau","doi":"10.1007/s00784-025-06303-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Large mandibular defects present challenges for bone regeneration. This pilot study evaluates the safety and preliminary efficacy of direct electrical stimulation (ES) on tissue healing in a preclinical model, testing whether ES can enhance bone formation in critical-size mandibular defects.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Six adult mini pigs with critical-size mandibular defects were used in a split-mouth design. The test group (n = 6) received 0.5 V AC/20 Hz ES for 3 × 45 min daily over three weeks, while the control group (n = 6) had no stimulation. Safety, early bone growth, and soft tissue effects were assessed at three locations: S1 (cancellous bone interface), S2 (middle of the defect), and S3 (pristine dense bone).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ES group showed no adverse effects, confirming implant safety. The ES group exhibited significantly higher bone formation, particularly in S2 and S3. Enhanced vascularization and immune response, in terms of increased mast cells, were also observed in S2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implant device with ES is safe and promotes bone formation and vascularization in select sub-regions (S2 and S3). However, ES alone may not suffice for complete bone regeneration in critical-sized defects, and further optimization is needed.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>This study demonstrates the potential of ES to improve bone healing in large mandibular defects, offering insights for clinical use in maxillofacial reconstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":10461,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Investigations","volume":"29 5","pages":"226"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and preliminary efficacy of an electrically stimulated implant for mandibular bone regeneration: a pilot study in a large animal model.\",\"authors\":\"Peer W Kämmerer, Nadja Engel, Rainer Bader, Vivien Engel, Bernhard Frerich, Diana Heimes, Justin Kröger, Laura Lembcke, Franz Plocksties, Hendrikje Raben, Ursula van Rienen, Armin Springer, Dirk Timmermann, Julius Zimmermann, Michael Dau\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00784-025-06303-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Large mandibular defects present challenges for bone regeneration. This pilot study evaluates the safety and preliminary efficacy of direct electrical stimulation (ES) on tissue healing in a preclinical model, testing whether ES can enhance bone formation in critical-size mandibular defects.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Six adult mini pigs with critical-size mandibular defects were used in a split-mouth design. The test group (n = 6) received 0.5 V AC/20 Hz ES for 3 × 45 min daily over three weeks, while the control group (n = 6) had no stimulation. Safety, early bone growth, and soft tissue effects were assessed at three locations: S1 (cancellous bone interface), S2 (middle of the defect), and S3 (pristine dense bone).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ES group showed no adverse effects, confirming implant safety. The ES group exhibited significantly higher bone formation, particularly in S2 and S3. Enhanced vascularization and immune response, in terms of increased mast cells, were also observed in S2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implant device with ES is safe and promotes bone formation and vascularization in select sub-regions (S2 and S3). However, ES alone may not suffice for complete bone regeneration in critical-sized defects, and further optimization is needed.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>This study demonstrates the potential of ES to improve bone healing in large mandibular defects, offering insights for clinical use in maxillofacial reconstruction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Oral Investigations\",\"volume\":\"29 5\",\"pages\":\"226\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Oral Investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-025-06303-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-025-06303-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:下颌骨大面积缺损对骨再生提出了挑战。本初步研究在临床前模型中评估直接电刺激(ES)对组织愈合的安全性和初步疗效,测试ES是否能促进临界尺寸下颌缺损的骨形成。材料与方法:选用6头具有临界尺寸下颌骨缺损的成年小型猪,采用裂口设计。试验组(n = 6)接受0.5 V AC/20 Hz ES,每天3 × 45 min,持续3周,对照组(n = 6)不给予刺激。在三个位置评估安全性、早期骨生长和软组织影响:S1(松质骨界面)、S2(缺损中间)和S3(原始致密骨)。结果:ES组无不良反应,证实种植体安全性。ES组骨形成明显增加,尤其是S2和S3。S2中还观察到肥大细胞增多,血管化和免疫反应增强。结论:ES种植装置是安全的,可促进特定亚区(S2和S3)的骨形成和血管形成。然而,仅ES可能不足以实现临界尺寸缺损的完全骨再生,需要进一步优化。临床意义:本研究证明了ES在改善下颌大缺损骨愈合方面的潜力,为颌面重建的临床应用提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety and preliminary efficacy of an electrically stimulated implant for mandibular bone regeneration: a pilot study in a large animal model.

Objectives: Large mandibular defects present challenges for bone regeneration. This pilot study evaluates the safety and preliminary efficacy of direct electrical stimulation (ES) on tissue healing in a preclinical model, testing whether ES can enhance bone formation in critical-size mandibular defects.

Materials and methods: Six adult mini pigs with critical-size mandibular defects were used in a split-mouth design. The test group (n = 6) received 0.5 V AC/20 Hz ES for 3 × 45 min daily over three weeks, while the control group (n = 6) had no stimulation. Safety, early bone growth, and soft tissue effects were assessed at three locations: S1 (cancellous bone interface), S2 (middle of the defect), and S3 (pristine dense bone).

Results: The ES group showed no adverse effects, confirming implant safety. The ES group exhibited significantly higher bone formation, particularly in S2 and S3. Enhanced vascularization and immune response, in terms of increased mast cells, were also observed in S2.

Conclusions: The implant device with ES is safe and promotes bone formation and vascularization in select sub-regions (S2 and S3). However, ES alone may not suffice for complete bone regeneration in critical-sized defects, and further optimization is needed.

Clinical relevance: This study demonstrates the potential of ES to improve bone healing in large mandibular defects, offering insights for clinical use in maxillofacial reconstruction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Oral Investigations
Clinical Oral Investigations 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
484
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal Clinical Oral Investigations is a multidisciplinary, international forum for publication of research from all fields of oral medicine. The journal publishes original scientific articles and invited reviews which provide up-to-date results of basic and clinical studies in oral and maxillofacial science and medicine. The aim is to clarify the relevance of new results to modern practice, for an international readership. Coverage includes maxillofacial and oral surgery, prosthetics and restorative dentistry, operative dentistry, endodontics, periodontology, orthodontics, dental materials science, clinical trials, epidemiology, pedodontics, oral implant, preventive dentistiry, oral pathology, oral basic sciences and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信