除去树木之外的碳。

IF 8.1 1区地球科学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Communications Earth & Environment Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-02 DOI:10.1038/s43247-025-02226-z

Emily Cox, Sean Low, Chad M Baum, Livia Fritz, Laurie Waller, Elspeth Spence, Nick Pidgeon, Rob Bellamy

{"title":"除去树木之外的碳。","authors":"Emily Cox, Sean Low, Chad M Baum, Livia Fritz, Laurie Waller, Elspeth Spence, Nick Pidgeon, Rob Bellamy","doi":"10.1038/s43247-025-02226-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The idea of planting trees to sequester carbon is so popular that it seems to make people feel more negative towards other techniques, when presented with a range of options for carbon removal. Such a bias could hamper development of a broad and socially-robust portfolio of carbon removal options.","PeriodicalId":10530,"journal":{"name":"Communications Earth & Environment","volume":"6 1","pages":"253"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11964908/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carbon removal beyond the trees.\",\"authors\":\"Emily Cox, Sean Low, Chad M Baum, Livia Fritz, Laurie Waller, Elspeth Spence, Nick Pidgeon, Rob Bellamy\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s43247-025-02226-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The idea of planting trees to sequester carbon is so popular that it seems to make people feel more negative towards other techniques, when presented with a range of options for carbon removal. Such a bias could hamper development of a broad and socially-robust portfolio of carbon removal options.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communications Earth & Environment\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"253\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11964908/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communications Earth & Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02226-z\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications Earth & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02226-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

通过植树来吸收碳的想法是如此流行，以至于当人们面对一系列碳去除的选择时，似乎会对其他技术感到更加消极。这种偏见可能会阻碍广泛且对社会有益的碳去除方案组合的发展。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Carbon removal beyond the trees.

The idea of planting trees to sequester carbon is so popular that it seems to make people feel more negative towards other techniques, when presented with a range of options for carbon removal. Such a bias could hamper development of a broad and socially-robust portfolio of carbon removal options.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Communications Earth & Environment Earth and Planetary Sciences-General Earth and Planetary Sciences

CiteScore

8.60

自引率

2.50%

发文量

269

审稿时长

26 weeks

期刊介绍： Communications Earth & Environment is an open access journal from Nature Portfolio publishing high-quality research, reviews and commentary in all areas of the Earth, environmental and planetary sciences. Research papers published by the journal represent significant advances that bring new insight to a specialized area in Earth science, planetary science or environmental science. Communications Earth & Environment has a 2-year impact factor of 7.9 (2022 Journal Citation Reports®). Articles published in the journal in 2022 were downloaded 1,412,858 times. Median time from submission to the first editorial decision is 8 days.