危重冠状动脉疾病患者中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值与全因死亡率之间的关系——基于MIMIC-IV数据库的研究

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2025.1502964
Yao Li, Dongbo Chen, Yifei Fan, Qing Zhu, Han Deng, Xin Chai
{"title":"危重冠状动脉疾病患者中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值与全因死亡率之间的关系——基于MIMIC-IV数据库的研究","authors":"Yao Li, Dongbo Chen, Yifei Fan, Qing Zhu, Han Deng, Xin Chai","doi":"10.3389/fcvm.2025.1502964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been presented as a possible indicator associated with the outcomes of growing patients and an available predictor of inflammation. Nevertheless, just a handful of researches shed light on the association between NLR and the consequences of critical patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). The study aimed to investigate the correlation between NLR and all-cause mortality of short-term and long-term in patients with CAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We obtained objective data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV version 2.2, a comprehensive and large-scale single-center database. NLR was calculated separately. Patients were categorized by quartiles of NLR: Q1 group (NLR < 3.56), Q2 (NLR 3.56-5.54), Q3 group (NLR 5.54-9.05), Q4 group (NLR > 9.05). Kaplan-Meier survival curves based on NLR quartiles were created to compare all-cause mortality rates, and the log-rank test evaluated the differences between groups. The hazard ratio (HR) of NLR as a risk factor for outcome events was assessed using the Cox proportional risk model with the Q1 group serving as the reference group and restricted cubic spline (RCS) with the infection points of 5.54.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3,692 patients were included in this study. The 30-day mortality rate among the patients was 8.85%, while the 365-day mortality rate was 16.98%. High NLR (NLR > 5.54) was significantly associated with 30-day mortality [HR, 3.99,95% confident interval (CI), (3.03-5.24); <i>P</i> < 0.001] and 365-day mortality [HR, 5.72, 95% CI (3.83-8.54); <i>P</i> < 0.001] in patients with critical CAD in the completely adjusted Cox proportional risk model. RCS analysis revealed a U-shaped relationship between NLR and outcome events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients diagnosed with critical CAD, a significant correlation was observed between NLR and all-cause mortality, particularly among individuals exhibiting elevated NLR levels. These findings suggest that NLR may serve as a valuable prognostic marker for evaluating both short-term and long-term mortality risk in this patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":12414,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"1502964"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11968710/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and all-cause mortality in critical patients with coronary artery disease - a study based on the MIMIC-IV database.\",\"authors\":\"Yao Li, Dongbo Chen, Yifei Fan, Qing Zhu, Han Deng, Xin Chai\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fcvm.2025.1502964\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been presented as a possible indicator associated with the outcomes of growing patients and an available predictor of inflammation. Nevertheless, just a handful of researches shed light on the association between NLR and the consequences of critical patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). The study aimed to investigate the correlation between NLR and all-cause mortality of short-term and long-term in patients with CAD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We obtained objective data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV version 2.2, a comprehensive and large-scale single-center database. NLR was calculated separately. Patients were categorized by quartiles of NLR: Q1 group (NLR < 3.56), Q2 (NLR 3.56-5.54), Q3 group (NLR 5.54-9.05), Q4 group (NLR > 9.05). Kaplan-Meier survival curves based on NLR quartiles were created to compare all-cause mortality rates, and the log-rank test evaluated the differences between groups. The hazard ratio (HR) of NLR as a risk factor for outcome events was assessed using the Cox proportional risk model with the Q1 group serving as the reference group and restricted cubic spline (RCS) with the infection points of 5.54.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3,692 patients were included in this study. The 30-day mortality rate among the patients was 8.85%, while the 365-day mortality rate was 16.98%. High NLR (NLR > 5.54) was significantly associated with 30-day mortality [HR, 3.99,95% confident interval (CI), (3.03-5.24); <i>P</i> < 0.001] and 365-day mortality [HR, 5.72, 95% CI (3.83-8.54); <i>P</i> < 0.001] in patients with critical CAD in the completely adjusted Cox proportional risk model. RCS analysis revealed a U-shaped relationship between NLR and outcome events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients diagnosed with critical CAD, a significant correlation was observed between NLR and all-cause mortality, particularly among individuals exhibiting elevated NLR levels. These findings suggest that NLR may serve as a valuable prognostic marker for evaluating both short-term and long-term mortality risk in this patient population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"1502964\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11968710/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2025.1502964\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2025.1502964","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR)已被认为是与生长患者预后相关的可能指标,也是炎症的可用预测指标。然而,只有少数研究揭示了NLR与危重冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者预后之间的关系。本研究旨在探讨NLR与冠心病患者短期和长期全因死亡率的相关性。方法:我们从重症监护医学信息集市(MIMIC)-IV 2.2版中获得客观数据,这是一个综合性、大规模的单中心数据库。NLR单独计算。患者按NLR四分位数进行分类:Q1组(NLR 9.05)。建立基于NLR四分位数的Kaplan-Meier生存曲线来比较全因死亡率,log-rank检验评估组间差异。以Q1组为参照组,感染点为5.54的限制性三次样条(RCS)为对照,采用Cox比例风险模型评估NLR作为结局事件危险因素的风险比(HR)。结果:本研究共纳入3692例患者。患者30天死亡率为8.85%,365天死亡率为16.98%。高NLR (NLR bb0 5.54)与30天死亡率显著相关[HR, 3.99,95%可信区间(CI), (3.03-5.24);结论:在诊断为重症CAD的患者中,NLR与全因死亡率之间存在显著相关性,特别是在NLR水平升高的个体中。这些发现表明NLR可以作为评估该患者群体短期和长期死亡风险的有价值的预后标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association between neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and all-cause mortality in critical patients with coronary artery disease - a study based on the MIMIC-IV database.

Background: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been presented as a possible indicator associated with the outcomes of growing patients and an available predictor of inflammation. Nevertheless, just a handful of researches shed light on the association between NLR and the consequences of critical patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). The study aimed to investigate the correlation between NLR and all-cause mortality of short-term and long-term in patients with CAD.

Methods: We obtained objective data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV version 2.2, a comprehensive and large-scale single-center database. NLR was calculated separately. Patients were categorized by quartiles of NLR: Q1 group (NLR < 3.56), Q2 (NLR 3.56-5.54), Q3 group (NLR 5.54-9.05), Q4 group (NLR > 9.05). Kaplan-Meier survival curves based on NLR quartiles were created to compare all-cause mortality rates, and the log-rank test evaluated the differences between groups. The hazard ratio (HR) of NLR as a risk factor for outcome events was assessed using the Cox proportional risk model with the Q1 group serving as the reference group and restricted cubic spline (RCS) with the infection points of 5.54.

Results: A total of 3,692 patients were included in this study. The 30-day mortality rate among the patients was 8.85%, while the 365-day mortality rate was 16.98%. High NLR (NLR > 5.54) was significantly associated with 30-day mortality [HR, 3.99,95% confident interval (CI), (3.03-5.24); P < 0.001] and 365-day mortality [HR, 5.72, 95% CI (3.83-8.54); P < 0.001] in patients with critical CAD in the completely adjusted Cox proportional risk model. RCS analysis revealed a U-shaped relationship between NLR and outcome events.

Conclusion: In patients diagnosed with critical CAD, a significant correlation was observed between NLR and all-cause mortality, particularly among individuals exhibiting elevated NLR levels. These findings suggest that NLR may serve as a valuable prognostic marker for evaluating both short-term and long-term mortality risk in this patient population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
3529
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers? Which frontiers? Where exactly are the frontiers of cardiovascular medicine? And who should be defining these frontiers? At Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine we believe it is worth being curious to foresee and explore beyond the current frontiers. In other words, we would like, through the articles published by our community journal Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, to anticipate the future of cardiovascular medicine, and thus better prevent cardiovascular disorders and improve therapeutic options and outcomes of our patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信