与非选择性除龋相比,逐步或选择性除龋在治疗重要恒牙深部龋中的有效性:一项系统综述,包括试验顺序、成对和网络荟萃分析。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Caries Research Pub Date : 2025-04-04 DOI:10.1159/000545052
Shaqayeq Ramezanzade, Lars Bjørndal, Haoran Chen, Aylin Baysan
{"title":"与非选择性除龋相比,逐步或选择性除龋在治疗重要恒牙深部龋中的有效性:一项系统综述,包括试验顺序、成对和网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Shaqayeq Ramezanzade, Lars Bjørndal, Haoran Chen, Aylin Baysan","doi":"10.1159/000545052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this systematic review was to assess the available evidence related to the effectiveness of stepwise (SW) or selective excavation (SE) when compared to non-selective caries excavation (NSE) for the management of permanent teeth with deep carious lesions without signs of irreversible pulpitis. This systematic review was conducted according to Cochrane guidelines. Literature search was performed using several databases including English language only. Pairwise and network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted. 19 out of 819 studies were included. The outcomes assessed were dental pulp exposure and the measure 'success' defined as tooth not having complications after a follow-up (i.e., without dental pulp exposure following treatment, no dental pulp complications after treatment, no periapical lesion, no severe/unbearable pain, no restoration failure or tooth extraction). The Risk of Bias analysis revealed that more than 50% of the studies had high risk of bias. In addition, the GRADE assessment for the outcomes showed that most of the evidence was low and very low quality. Based on the results of the NMA, SW had the highest success rate (RR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.00-1.23, with NSE as the reference), followed by SE (RR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.97-1.16, with NSE as the reference). However, the difference was not statistically significant. In most cases, SE was the treatment of choice in relation to carious lesion depths with the threshold of >2/3 of the dentine thickness and SW was advocated only in cooperative patients due to the two-step procedures. However, within the limitations of this review, the effect of remaining carious dentine could not be assessed with respect to the success rate for each intervention. Therefore, long-term well organized multi-centre randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are still required to provide concrete evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":9620,"journal":{"name":"Caries Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-52"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of stepwise or selective in comparison to non-selective caries removal in managing deep caries in vital permanent teeth: A systematic review with trial sequential, pairwise and network meta-analyses.\",\"authors\":\"Shaqayeq Ramezanzade, Lars Bjørndal, Haoran Chen, Aylin Baysan\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000545052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this systematic review was to assess the available evidence related to the effectiveness of stepwise (SW) or selective excavation (SE) when compared to non-selective caries excavation (NSE) for the management of permanent teeth with deep carious lesions without signs of irreversible pulpitis. This systematic review was conducted according to Cochrane guidelines. Literature search was performed using several databases including English language only. Pairwise and network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted. 19 out of 819 studies were included. The outcomes assessed were dental pulp exposure and the measure 'success' defined as tooth not having complications after a follow-up (i.e., without dental pulp exposure following treatment, no dental pulp complications after treatment, no periapical lesion, no severe/unbearable pain, no restoration failure or tooth extraction). The Risk of Bias analysis revealed that more than 50% of the studies had high risk of bias. In addition, the GRADE assessment for the outcomes showed that most of the evidence was low and very low quality. Based on the results of the NMA, SW had the highest success rate (RR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.00-1.23, with NSE as the reference), followed by SE (RR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.97-1.16, with NSE as the reference). However, the difference was not statistically significant. In most cases, SE was the treatment of choice in relation to carious lesion depths with the threshold of >2/3 of the dentine thickness and SW was advocated only in cooperative patients due to the two-step procedures. However, within the limitations of this review, the effect of remaining carious dentine could not be assessed with respect to the success rate for each intervention. Therefore, long-term well organized multi-centre randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are still required to provide concrete evidence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Caries Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Caries Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545052\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Caries Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545052","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本系统综述的目的是评估与非选择性龋齿切除术(NSE)相比,分步切除术(SW)或选择性切除术(SE)在治疗无不可逆牙髓炎迹象的深龋恒牙方面的有效性相关的现有证据。本系统综述根据 Cochrane 指南进行。文献检索使用了多个数据库,其中仅包括英文数据库。进行了配对分析和网络荟萃分析(NMA)。819 项研究中有 19 项被纳入。评估的结果是牙髓暴露和 "成功 "的衡量标准,"成功 "的定义是随访后牙齿无并发症(即治疗后无牙髓暴露、治疗后无牙髓并发症、无根尖周病变、无剧烈/难以忍受的疼痛、无修复失败或拔牙)。偏倚风险分析显示,50% 以上的研究存在高偏倚风险。此外,对结果的 GRADE 评估显示,大多数证据的质量较低或很低。根据 NMA 的结果,SW 的成功率最高(RR:1.11,95% CI:1.00-1.23,以 NSE 为参照),其次是 SE(RR:1.06,95% CI:0.97-1.16,以 NSE 为参照)。然而,两者之间的差异在统计学上并不显著。在大多数情况下,对于龋损深度大于牙本质厚度 2/3 的阈值,SE 是首选的治疗方法,而 SW 由于需要两步操作,仅在合作的患者中提倡使用。然而,由于本综述的局限性,无法评估剩余龋坏牙本质对每种干预方法成功率的影响。因此,仍需要长期组织良好的多中心随机对照试验(RCT)来提供具体证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of stepwise or selective in comparison to non-selective caries removal in managing deep caries in vital permanent teeth: A systematic review with trial sequential, pairwise and network meta-analyses.

The aim of this systematic review was to assess the available evidence related to the effectiveness of stepwise (SW) or selective excavation (SE) when compared to non-selective caries excavation (NSE) for the management of permanent teeth with deep carious lesions without signs of irreversible pulpitis. This systematic review was conducted according to Cochrane guidelines. Literature search was performed using several databases including English language only. Pairwise and network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted. 19 out of 819 studies were included. The outcomes assessed were dental pulp exposure and the measure 'success' defined as tooth not having complications after a follow-up (i.e., without dental pulp exposure following treatment, no dental pulp complications after treatment, no periapical lesion, no severe/unbearable pain, no restoration failure or tooth extraction). The Risk of Bias analysis revealed that more than 50% of the studies had high risk of bias. In addition, the GRADE assessment for the outcomes showed that most of the evidence was low and very low quality. Based on the results of the NMA, SW had the highest success rate (RR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.00-1.23, with NSE as the reference), followed by SE (RR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.97-1.16, with NSE as the reference). However, the difference was not statistically significant. In most cases, SE was the treatment of choice in relation to carious lesion depths with the threshold of >2/3 of the dentine thickness and SW was advocated only in cooperative patients due to the two-step procedures. However, within the limitations of this review, the effect of remaining carious dentine could not be assessed with respect to the success rate for each intervention. Therefore, long-term well organized multi-centre randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are still required to provide concrete evidence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Caries Research
Caries Research 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
34
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Caries Research'' publishes epidemiological, clinical and laboratory studies in dental caries, erosion and related dental diseases. Some studies build on the considerable advances already made in caries prevention, e.g. through fluoride application. Some aim to improve understanding of the increasingly important problem of dental erosion and the associated tooth wear process. Others monitor the changing pattern of caries in different populations, explore improved methods of diagnosis or evaluate methods of prevention or treatment. The broad coverage of current research has given the journal an international reputation as an indispensable source for both basic scientists and clinicians engaged in understanding, investigating and preventing dental disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信