Shaqayeq Ramezanzade, Lars Bjørndal, Haoran Chen, Aylin Baysan
{"title":"与非选择性除龋相比,逐步或选择性除龋在治疗重要恒牙深部龋中的有效性:一项系统综述,包括试验顺序、成对和网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Shaqayeq Ramezanzade, Lars Bjørndal, Haoran Chen, Aylin Baysan","doi":"10.1159/000545052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this systematic review was to assess the available evidence related to the effectiveness of stepwise (SW) or selective excavation (SE) when compared to non-selective caries excavation (NSE) for the management of permanent teeth with deep carious lesions without signs of irreversible pulpitis. This systematic review was conducted according to Cochrane guidelines. Literature search was performed using several databases including English language only. Pairwise and network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted. 19 out of 819 studies were included. The outcomes assessed were dental pulp exposure and the measure 'success' defined as tooth not having complications after a follow-up (i.e., without dental pulp exposure following treatment, no dental pulp complications after treatment, no periapical lesion, no severe/unbearable pain, no restoration failure or tooth extraction). The Risk of Bias analysis revealed that more than 50% of the studies had high risk of bias. In addition, the GRADE assessment for the outcomes showed that most of the evidence was low and very low quality. Based on the results of the NMA, SW had the highest success rate (RR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.00-1.23, with NSE as the reference), followed by SE (RR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.97-1.16, with NSE as the reference). However, the difference was not statistically significant. In most cases, SE was the treatment of choice in relation to carious lesion depths with the threshold of >2/3 of the dentine thickness and SW was advocated only in cooperative patients due to the two-step procedures. However, within the limitations of this review, the effect of remaining carious dentine could not be assessed with respect to the success rate for each intervention. Therefore, long-term well organized multi-centre randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are still required to provide concrete evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":9620,"journal":{"name":"Caries Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-52"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of stepwise or selective in comparison to non-selective caries removal in managing deep caries in vital permanent teeth: A systematic review with trial sequential, pairwise and network meta-analyses.\",\"authors\":\"Shaqayeq Ramezanzade, Lars Bjørndal, Haoran Chen, Aylin Baysan\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000545052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this systematic review was to assess the available evidence related to the effectiveness of stepwise (SW) or selective excavation (SE) when compared to non-selective caries excavation (NSE) for the management of permanent teeth with deep carious lesions without signs of irreversible pulpitis. This systematic review was conducted according to Cochrane guidelines. Literature search was performed using several databases including English language only. Pairwise and network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted. 19 out of 819 studies were included. The outcomes assessed were dental pulp exposure and the measure 'success' defined as tooth not having complications after a follow-up (i.e., without dental pulp exposure following treatment, no dental pulp complications after treatment, no periapical lesion, no severe/unbearable pain, no restoration failure or tooth extraction). The Risk of Bias analysis revealed that more than 50% of the studies had high risk of bias. In addition, the GRADE assessment for the outcomes showed that most of the evidence was low and very low quality. Based on the results of the NMA, SW had the highest success rate (RR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.00-1.23, with NSE as the reference), followed by SE (RR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.97-1.16, with NSE as the reference). However, the difference was not statistically significant. In most cases, SE was the treatment of choice in relation to carious lesion depths with the threshold of >2/3 of the dentine thickness and SW was advocated only in cooperative patients due to the two-step procedures. However, within the limitations of this review, the effect of remaining carious dentine could not be assessed with respect to the success rate for each intervention. Therefore, long-term well organized multi-centre randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are still required to provide concrete evidence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Caries Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Caries Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545052\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Caries Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000545052","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effectiveness of stepwise or selective in comparison to non-selective caries removal in managing deep caries in vital permanent teeth: A systematic review with trial sequential, pairwise and network meta-analyses.
The aim of this systematic review was to assess the available evidence related to the effectiveness of stepwise (SW) or selective excavation (SE) when compared to non-selective caries excavation (NSE) for the management of permanent teeth with deep carious lesions without signs of irreversible pulpitis. This systematic review was conducted according to Cochrane guidelines. Literature search was performed using several databases including English language only. Pairwise and network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted. 19 out of 819 studies were included. The outcomes assessed were dental pulp exposure and the measure 'success' defined as tooth not having complications after a follow-up (i.e., without dental pulp exposure following treatment, no dental pulp complications after treatment, no periapical lesion, no severe/unbearable pain, no restoration failure or tooth extraction). The Risk of Bias analysis revealed that more than 50% of the studies had high risk of bias. In addition, the GRADE assessment for the outcomes showed that most of the evidence was low and very low quality. Based on the results of the NMA, SW had the highest success rate (RR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.00-1.23, with NSE as the reference), followed by SE (RR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.97-1.16, with NSE as the reference). However, the difference was not statistically significant. In most cases, SE was the treatment of choice in relation to carious lesion depths with the threshold of >2/3 of the dentine thickness and SW was advocated only in cooperative patients due to the two-step procedures. However, within the limitations of this review, the effect of remaining carious dentine could not be assessed with respect to the success rate for each intervention. Therefore, long-term well organized multi-centre randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are still required to provide concrete evidence.
期刊介绍:
''Caries Research'' publishes epidemiological, clinical and laboratory studies in dental caries, erosion and related dental diseases. Some studies build on the considerable advances already made in caries prevention, e.g. through fluoride application. Some aim to improve understanding of the increasingly important problem of dental erosion and the associated tooth wear process. Others monitor the changing pattern of caries in different populations, explore improved methods of diagnosis or evaluate methods of prevention or treatment. The broad coverage of current research has given the journal an international reputation as an indispensable source for both basic scientists and clinicians engaged in understanding, investigating and preventing dental disease.