Ester Moñivas, Concepción Aguayo, Silvia de la Calle, Paula Martínez, Nieves Repollés, Mercedes Zurita
{"title":"使用纤oll分离单核细胞和间充质干细胞的手动和自动方法的比较:有效性和可重复性。","authors":"Ester Moñivas, Concepción Aguayo, Silvia de la Calle, Paula Martínez, Nieves Repollés, Mercedes Zurita","doi":"10.3389/fcell.2025.1556697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), hold immense therapeutic promise in Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs) due to their multipotent nature, immunomodulatory properties, and anti-inflammatory effects. However, a significant challenge lies in obtaining sufficient quantities of MSCs for therapeutic applications, necessitating <i>ex-vivo</i> culture of Mononuclear Cells (MNCs) isolated from source tissues like bone marrow. This study compares the efficacy of MNC isolation using manual and automated methods, specifically evaluating the Sepax system, and investigates whether the isolation method impacts MSCs yield. Seventeen bone marrow samples were processed using both methods, with subsequent analysis of MNC and colony-forming unit (CFU) counts, MSCs differentiation potential, and phenotypic characterization. While the Sepax system demonstrated slightly higher MNC yields, no significant differences were observed in CFU formation or MSCs characteristics compared to manual isolation. These findings underscore the importance of critically evaluating isolation methods to ensure both efficiency and quality in therapeutic applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":12448,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology","volume":"13 ","pages":"1556697"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11969043/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between manual and automated methods for the isolation of mononuclear cells and mesenchymal stem cells using ficoll: efficacy and reproducibility.\",\"authors\":\"Ester Moñivas, Concepción Aguayo, Silvia de la Calle, Paula Martínez, Nieves Repollés, Mercedes Zurita\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fcell.2025.1556697\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), hold immense therapeutic promise in Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs) due to their multipotent nature, immunomodulatory properties, and anti-inflammatory effects. However, a significant challenge lies in obtaining sufficient quantities of MSCs for therapeutic applications, necessitating <i>ex-vivo</i> culture of Mononuclear Cells (MNCs) isolated from source tissues like bone marrow. This study compares the efficacy of MNC isolation using manual and automated methods, specifically evaluating the Sepax system, and investigates whether the isolation method impacts MSCs yield. Seventeen bone marrow samples were processed using both methods, with subsequent analysis of MNC and colony-forming unit (CFU) counts, MSCs differentiation potential, and phenotypic characterization. While the Sepax system demonstrated slightly higher MNC yields, no significant differences were observed in CFU formation or MSCs characteristics compared to manual isolation. These findings underscore the importance of critically evaluating isolation methods to ensure both efficiency and quality in therapeutic applications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12448,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"1556697\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11969043/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2025.1556697\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2025.1556697","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison between manual and automated methods for the isolation of mononuclear cells and mesenchymal stem cells using ficoll: efficacy and reproducibility.
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), hold immense therapeutic promise in Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs) due to their multipotent nature, immunomodulatory properties, and anti-inflammatory effects. However, a significant challenge lies in obtaining sufficient quantities of MSCs for therapeutic applications, necessitating ex-vivo culture of Mononuclear Cells (MNCs) isolated from source tissues like bone marrow. This study compares the efficacy of MNC isolation using manual and automated methods, specifically evaluating the Sepax system, and investigates whether the isolation method impacts MSCs yield. Seventeen bone marrow samples were processed using both methods, with subsequent analysis of MNC and colony-forming unit (CFU) counts, MSCs differentiation potential, and phenotypic characterization. While the Sepax system demonstrated slightly higher MNC yields, no significant differences were observed in CFU formation or MSCs characteristics compared to manual isolation. These findings underscore the importance of critically evaluating isolation methods to ensure both efficiency and quality in therapeutic applications.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology is a broad-scope, interdisciplinary open-access journal, focusing on the fundamental processes of life, led by Prof Amanda Fisher and supported by a geographically diverse, high-quality editorial board.
The journal welcomes submissions on a wide spectrum of cell and developmental biology, covering intracellular and extracellular dynamics, with sections focusing on signaling, adhesion, migration, cell death and survival and membrane trafficking. Additionally, the journal offers sections dedicated to the cutting edge of fundamental and translational research in molecular medicine and stem cell biology.
With a collaborative, rigorous and transparent peer-review, the journal produces the highest scientific quality in both fundamental and applied research, and advanced article level metrics measure the real-time impact and influence of each publication.