使用纤oll分离单核细胞和间充质干细胞的手动和自动方法的比较:有效性和可重复性。

IF 4.6 2区 生物学 Q2 CELL BIOLOGY
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology Pub Date : 2025-03-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fcell.2025.1556697
Ester Moñivas, Concepción Aguayo, Silvia de la Calle, Paula Martínez, Nieves Repollés, Mercedes Zurita
{"title":"使用纤oll分离单核细胞和间充质干细胞的手动和自动方法的比较:有效性和可重复性。","authors":"Ester Moñivas, Concepción Aguayo, Silvia de la Calle, Paula Martínez, Nieves Repollés, Mercedes Zurita","doi":"10.3389/fcell.2025.1556697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), hold immense therapeutic promise in Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs) due to their multipotent nature, immunomodulatory properties, and anti-inflammatory effects. However, a significant challenge lies in obtaining sufficient quantities of MSCs for therapeutic applications, necessitating <i>ex-vivo</i> culture of Mononuclear Cells (MNCs) isolated from source tissues like bone marrow. This study compares the efficacy of MNC isolation using manual and automated methods, specifically evaluating the Sepax system, and investigates whether the isolation method impacts MSCs yield. Seventeen bone marrow samples were processed using both methods, with subsequent analysis of MNC and colony-forming unit (CFU) counts, MSCs differentiation potential, and phenotypic characterization. While the Sepax system demonstrated slightly higher MNC yields, no significant differences were observed in CFU formation or MSCs characteristics compared to manual isolation. These findings underscore the importance of critically evaluating isolation methods to ensure both efficiency and quality in therapeutic applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":12448,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology","volume":"13 ","pages":"1556697"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11969043/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison between manual and automated methods for the isolation of mononuclear cells and mesenchymal stem cells using ficoll: efficacy and reproducibility.\",\"authors\":\"Ester Moñivas, Concepción Aguayo, Silvia de la Calle, Paula Martínez, Nieves Repollés, Mercedes Zurita\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fcell.2025.1556697\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), hold immense therapeutic promise in Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs) due to their multipotent nature, immunomodulatory properties, and anti-inflammatory effects. However, a significant challenge lies in obtaining sufficient quantities of MSCs for therapeutic applications, necessitating <i>ex-vivo</i> culture of Mononuclear Cells (MNCs) isolated from source tissues like bone marrow. This study compares the efficacy of MNC isolation using manual and automated methods, specifically evaluating the Sepax system, and investigates whether the isolation method impacts MSCs yield. Seventeen bone marrow samples were processed using both methods, with subsequent analysis of MNC and colony-forming unit (CFU) counts, MSCs differentiation potential, and phenotypic characterization. While the Sepax system demonstrated slightly higher MNC yields, no significant differences were observed in CFU formation or MSCs characteristics compared to manual isolation. These findings underscore the importance of critically evaluating isolation methods to ensure both efficiency and quality in therapeutic applications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12448,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"1556697\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11969043/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2025.1556697\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2025.1556697","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

间充质干细胞(MSCs)具有多能性、免疫调节特性和抗炎作用,因此在高级治疗药物(ATMPs)中具有巨大的治疗前景。然而,如何获得足够数量的间充质干细胞用于治疗应用是一项重大挑战,这就需要从骨髓等源组织中分离出单核细胞(MNC)进行体外培养。本研究比较了人工和自动方法分离 MNC 的效果,特别评估了 Sepax 系统,并研究了分离方法是否会影响间充质干细胞的产量。采用这两种方法处理了 17 份骨髓样本,随后对 MNC 和集落形成单位(CFU)计数、间充质干细胞分化潜能和表型特征进行了分析。虽然 Sepax 系统的 MNC 产量略高,但与人工分离相比,在 CFU 形成或间叶干细胞特征方面没有观察到明显差异。这些发现强调了严格评估分离方法以确保治疗应用的效率和质量的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison between manual and automated methods for the isolation of mononuclear cells and mesenchymal stem cells using ficoll: efficacy and reproducibility.

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), hold immense therapeutic promise in Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs) due to their multipotent nature, immunomodulatory properties, and anti-inflammatory effects. However, a significant challenge lies in obtaining sufficient quantities of MSCs for therapeutic applications, necessitating ex-vivo culture of Mononuclear Cells (MNCs) isolated from source tissues like bone marrow. This study compares the efficacy of MNC isolation using manual and automated methods, specifically evaluating the Sepax system, and investigates whether the isolation method impacts MSCs yield. Seventeen bone marrow samples were processed using both methods, with subsequent analysis of MNC and colony-forming unit (CFU) counts, MSCs differentiation potential, and phenotypic characterization. While the Sepax system demonstrated slightly higher MNC yields, no significant differences were observed in CFU formation or MSCs characteristics compared to manual isolation. These findings underscore the importance of critically evaluating isolation methods to ensure both efficiency and quality in therapeutic applications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Cell Biology
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
2531
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology is a broad-scope, interdisciplinary open-access journal, focusing on the fundamental processes of life, led by Prof Amanda Fisher and supported by a geographically diverse, high-quality editorial board. The journal welcomes submissions on a wide spectrum of cell and developmental biology, covering intracellular and extracellular dynamics, with sections focusing on signaling, adhesion, migration, cell death and survival and membrane trafficking. Additionally, the journal offers sections dedicated to the cutting edge of fundamental and translational research in molecular medicine and stem cell biology. With a collaborative, rigorous and transparent peer-review, the journal produces the highest scientific quality in both fundamental and applied research, and advanced article level metrics measure the real-time impact and influence of each publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信