评价腹腔热化疗在晚期卵巢癌细胞减少术中的作用。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Annals of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-06 DOI:10.1245/s10434-025-17269-x
Adrian Kohut, Matthew L Anderson, Vaagn Andikyan, Maya Yasukawa, Lindsey Nguy, Andreas Karachristos, Timothy Nywening, Gil Mor, Radhika Gogoi, Joshua G Cohen, Jeff F Lin, Thomas J Rutherford
{"title":"评价腹腔热化疗在晚期卵巢癌细胞减少术中的作用。","authors":"Adrian Kohut, Matthew L Anderson, Vaagn Andikyan, Maya Yasukawa, Lindsey Nguy, Andreas Karachristos, Timothy Nywening, Gil Mor, Radhika Gogoi, Joshua G Cohen, Jeff F Lin, Thomas J Rutherford","doi":"10.1245/s10434-025-17269-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is used to eliminate minimal residual disease in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies, including advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). While some trials suggest potential benefits, the role of HIPEC during cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in EOC remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate outcomes for patients undergoing HIPEC during CRS for advanced-stage EOC in the United States (US).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included women with stage III-IV EOC who underwent CRS with or without HIPEC between 2006 and 2021 at Commission on Cancer-accredited US facilities. Propensity score matching was used to create a control group of patients who underwent CRS only. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier log-rank method and adjusted for confounding factors with Cox proportional hazards regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1400 patients identified, 700 underwent CRS with HIPEC and 700 underwent CRS only. Of these 1400 patients, 932 underwent interval CRS and 468 underwent primary CRS. No significant difference in median OS was observed between the overall CRS+HIPEC and CRS-only groups (57.6 vs. 47.6 months; p = 0.105). However, interval CRS+HIPEC was associated with significantly improved median OS compared with interval CRS-only (57.6 vs. 45.7 months; p = 0.003). After adjustment, HIPEC remained significantly associated with improved survival (hazard ratio 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.64-0.92; p = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HIPEC is associated with improved OS in patients undergoing interval CRS for advanced-stage EOC. Further research should explore the selective use of HIPEC during interval CRS.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"4326-4334"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Role of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Cytoreductive Surgery for Advanced-Stage Ovarian Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Adrian Kohut, Matthew L Anderson, Vaagn Andikyan, Maya Yasukawa, Lindsey Nguy, Andreas Karachristos, Timothy Nywening, Gil Mor, Radhika Gogoi, Joshua G Cohen, Jeff F Lin, Thomas J Rutherford\",\"doi\":\"10.1245/s10434-025-17269-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is used to eliminate minimal residual disease in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies, including advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). While some trials suggest potential benefits, the role of HIPEC during cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in EOC remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate outcomes for patients undergoing HIPEC during CRS for advanced-stage EOC in the United States (US).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included women with stage III-IV EOC who underwent CRS with or without HIPEC between 2006 and 2021 at Commission on Cancer-accredited US facilities. Propensity score matching was used to create a control group of patients who underwent CRS only. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier log-rank method and adjusted for confounding factors with Cox proportional hazards regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1400 patients identified, 700 underwent CRS with HIPEC and 700 underwent CRS only. Of these 1400 patients, 932 underwent interval CRS and 468 underwent primary CRS. No significant difference in median OS was observed between the overall CRS+HIPEC and CRS-only groups (57.6 vs. 47.6 months; p = 0.105). However, interval CRS+HIPEC was associated with significantly improved median OS compared with interval CRS-only (57.6 vs. 45.7 months; p = 0.003). After adjustment, HIPEC remained significantly associated with improved survival (hazard ratio 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.64-0.92; p = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HIPEC is associated with improved OS in patients undergoing interval CRS for advanced-stage EOC. Further research should explore the selective use of HIPEC during interval CRS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"4326-4334\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-17269-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-17269-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腹腔高温化疗(HIPEC)用于消除腹膜表面恶性肿瘤(包括晚期上皮性卵巢癌(EOC))患者的微小残留疾病。虽然一些试验显示了潜在的益处,但HIPEC在EOC细胞减少手术(CRS)中的作用仍不确定。本研究旨在评估美国晚期EOC患者在CRS期间接受HIPEC的结果。方法:这项多中心、回顾性队列研究纳入了2006年至2021年间在美国癌症委员会认可的机构接受了伴有或不伴有HIPEC的III-IV期EOC的妇女。倾向评分匹配用于创建仅接受CRS的患者的对照组。采用Kaplan-Meier对数秩法分析总生存期(OS),并用Cox比例风险回归对混杂因素进行校正。结果:1400例患者中,700例合并HIPEC行CRS, 700例仅行CRS。在这1400例患者中,932例接受间歇CRS, 468例接受原发性CRS。总体CRS+HIPEC组和仅CRS组的中位OS无显著差异(57.6个月vs 47.6个月;p = 0.105)。然而,与仅使用间歇期CRS相比,间歇期CRS+HIPEC与中位OS的显著改善相关(57.6个月vs 45.7个月;p = 0.003)。调整后,HIPEC与生存率的提高仍然显著相关(风险比0.77,95%可信区间0.64-0.92;p = 0.004)。结论:HIPEC与接受间歇CRS治疗的晚期EOC患者的OS改善相关。进一步的研究应探讨HIPEC在间歇CRS中的选择性使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the Role of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Cytoreductive Surgery for Advanced-Stage Ovarian Cancer.

Background: Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is used to eliminate minimal residual disease in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies, including advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). While some trials suggest potential benefits, the role of HIPEC during cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in EOC remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate outcomes for patients undergoing HIPEC during CRS for advanced-stage EOC in the United States (US).

Methods: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included women with stage III-IV EOC who underwent CRS with or without HIPEC between 2006 and 2021 at Commission on Cancer-accredited US facilities. Propensity score matching was used to create a control group of patients who underwent CRS only. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier log-rank method and adjusted for confounding factors with Cox proportional hazards regression.

Results: Among 1400 patients identified, 700 underwent CRS with HIPEC and 700 underwent CRS only. Of these 1400 patients, 932 underwent interval CRS and 468 underwent primary CRS. No significant difference in median OS was observed between the overall CRS+HIPEC and CRS-only groups (57.6 vs. 47.6 months; p = 0.105). However, interval CRS+HIPEC was associated with significantly improved median OS compared with interval CRS-only (57.6 vs. 45.7 months; p = 0.003). After adjustment, HIPEC remained significantly associated with improved survival (hazard ratio 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.64-0.92; p = 0.004).

Conclusions: HIPEC is associated with improved OS in patients undergoing interval CRS for advanced-stage EOC. Further research should explore the selective use of HIPEC during interval CRS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
1698
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信