复杂PCI和optivus -复杂PCI研究多血管队列的1年结果。

IF 3.1 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Masaomi Gohbara, Kiyoshi Hibi, Takeshi Morimoto, Hidekuni Kirigaya, Ko Yamamoto, Koh Ono, Hiroki Shiomi, Masanobu Ohya, Kyohei Yamaji, Hiroki Watanabe, Tetsuya Amano, Yoshihiro Morino, Kensuke Takagi, Junko Honye, Hitoshi Matsuo, Mitsuru Abe, Kazushige Kadota, Kenji Ando, Koichi Nakao, Shinjo Sonoda, Satoru Suwa, Kazuya Kawai, Ken Kozuma, Yoshihisa Nakagawa, Yuji Ikari, Mamoru Nanasato, Keiichi Hanaoka, Kengo Tanabe, Yoshiki Hata, Takashi Akasaka, Takeshi Kimura
{"title":"复杂PCI和optivus -复杂PCI研究多血管队列的1年结果。","authors":"Masaomi Gohbara, Kiyoshi Hibi, Takeshi Morimoto, Hidekuni Kirigaya, Ko Yamamoto, Koh Ono, Hiroki Shiomi, Masanobu Ohya, Kyohei Yamaji, Hiroki Watanabe, Tetsuya Amano, Yoshihiro Morino, Kensuke Takagi, Junko Honye, Hitoshi Matsuo, Mitsuru Abe, Kazushige Kadota, Kenji Ando, Koichi Nakao, Shinjo Sonoda, Satoru Suwa, Kazuya Kawai, Ken Kozuma, Yoshihisa Nakagawa, Yuji Ikari, Mamoru Nanasato, Keiichi Hanaoka, Kengo Tanabe, Yoshiki Hata, Takashi Akasaka, Takeshi Kimura","doi":"10.1007/s12928-025-01110-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It remains unknown whether intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can improve the clinical outcomes of complex PCI to a level equivalent to that of non-complex PCI. In the OPTIVUS-Complex PCI (Optimal Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Complex PCI) Study multivessel cohort, a total of 1011 patients who underwent multivessel PCI involving a target lesion in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) were divided into 2 groups: complex PCI (N = 760) and non-complex PCI groups (N = 251). Complex PCI was defined as a procedure with the following characteristics: 3 vessels treated, 3 stents implanted, 3 lesions treated, bifurcation with 2 stents implanted, total stent length > 60 mm, or target of chronic total occlusion. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) defined by a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or any coronary revascularization. The cumulative 1-year incidences of the primary endpoint and any coronary revascularization were not significantly different between the complex and non-complex PCI groups (10.9% vs. 8.3%, P = 0.24, and 7.7% vs. 4.8%, P = 0.12, respectively). In the multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, there was no significant excess risk of the complex PCI group relative to the non-complex PCI group for the primary endpoint (HR, 1.35; 95%CI, 0.83-2.18; P = 0.22), or for any coronary revascularization (HR, 1.64; 95%CI, 0.87-3.06; P = 0.11). After optimal IVUS-guided multivessel PCI with a target lesion in the LAD, 1-year risk of MACCE or coronary revascularization in patients with complex PCI was numerically higher than that in patients with non-complex PCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":9439,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Complex PCI and 1-year outcomes in the OPTIVUS-complex PCI study multivessel cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Masaomi Gohbara, Kiyoshi Hibi, Takeshi Morimoto, Hidekuni Kirigaya, Ko Yamamoto, Koh Ono, Hiroki Shiomi, Masanobu Ohya, Kyohei Yamaji, Hiroki Watanabe, Tetsuya Amano, Yoshihiro Morino, Kensuke Takagi, Junko Honye, Hitoshi Matsuo, Mitsuru Abe, Kazushige Kadota, Kenji Ando, Koichi Nakao, Shinjo Sonoda, Satoru Suwa, Kazuya Kawai, Ken Kozuma, Yoshihisa Nakagawa, Yuji Ikari, Mamoru Nanasato, Keiichi Hanaoka, Kengo Tanabe, Yoshiki Hata, Takashi Akasaka, Takeshi Kimura\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12928-025-01110-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>It remains unknown whether intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can improve the clinical outcomes of complex PCI to a level equivalent to that of non-complex PCI. In the OPTIVUS-Complex PCI (Optimal Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Complex PCI) Study multivessel cohort, a total of 1011 patients who underwent multivessel PCI involving a target lesion in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) were divided into 2 groups: complex PCI (N = 760) and non-complex PCI groups (N = 251). Complex PCI was defined as a procedure with the following characteristics: 3 vessels treated, 3 stents implanted, 3 lesions treated, bifurcation with 2 stents implanted, total stent length > 60 mm, or target of chronic total occlusion. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) defined by a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or any coronary revascularization. The cumulative 1-year incidences of the primary endpoint and any coronary revascularization were not significantly different between the complex and non-complex PCI groups (10.9% vs. 8.3%, P = 0.24, and 7.7% vs. 4.8%, P = 0.12, respectively). In the multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, there was no significant excess risk of the complex PCI group relative to the non-complex PCI group for the primary endpoint (HR, 1.35; 95%CI, 0.83-2.18; P = 0.22), or for any coronary revascularization (HR, 1.64; 95%CI, 0.87-3.06; P = 0.11). After optimal IVUS-guided multivessel PCI with a target lesion in the LAD, 1-year risk of MACCE or coronary revascularization in patients with complex PCI was numerically higher than that in patients with non-complex PCI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-025-01110-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-025-01110-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前尚不清楚血管内超声(IVUS)引导下的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)能否将复杂PCI的临床结果提高到与非复杂PCI相当的水平。在OPTIVUS-Complex PCI(最佳血管内超声引导的复杂PCI)研究多血管队列中,共有1011例患者接受了涉及左冠状动脉前降支(LAD)目标病变的多血管PCI治疗,分为复杂PCI组(N = 760)和非复杂PCI组(N = 251)。复杂PCI被定义为具有以下特征的手术:治疗了3根血管,植入了3个支架,治疗了3个病变,植入了2个支架,支架总长度bbb60 mm,或达到慢性全闭塞的目标。主要终点是主要心脑血管不良事件(MACCE),由死亡、心肌梗死、中风或任何冠状动脉血运重建术组成。在复杂和非复杂PCI组之间,主要终点和任何冠状动脉血运重建术的累积1年发生率无显著差异(分别为10.9%对8.3%,P = 0.24, 7.7%对4.8%,P = 0.12)。在多变量Cox比例风险模型中,在主要终点,复杂PCI组相对于非复杂PCI组没有显著的额外风险(HR, 1.35;95%置信区间,0.83 - -2.18;P = 0.22),或任何冠状动脉血运重建术(HR, 1.64;95%置信区间,0.87 - -3.06;p = 0.11)。在最佳ivus引导下,在LAD中有目标病变的多支PCI后,复杂PCI患者1年发生MACCE或冠状动脉血运重建术的风险高于非复杂PCI患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Complex PCI and 1-year outcomes in the OPTIVUS-complex PCI study multivessel cohort.

It remains unknown whether intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) can improve the clinical outcomes of complex PCI to a level equivalent to that of non-complex PCI. In the OPTIVUS-Complex PCI (Optimal Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Complex PCI) Study multivessel cohort, a total of 1011 patients who underwent multivessel PCI involving a target lesion in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) were divided into 2 groups: complex PCI (N = 760) and non-complex PCI groups (N = 251). Complex PCI was defined as a procedure with the following characteristics: 3 vessels treated, 3 stents implanted, 3 lesions treated, bifurcation with 2 stents implanted, total stent length > 60 mm, or target of chronic total occlusion. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) defined by a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or any coronary revascularization. The cumulative 1-year incidences of the primary endpoint and any coronary revascularization were not significantly different between the complex and non-complex PCI groups (10.9% vs. 8.3%, P = 0.24, and 7.7% vs. 4.8%, P = 0.12, respectively). In the multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, there was no significant excess risk of the complex PCI group relative to the non-complex PCI group for the primary endpoint (HR, 1.35; 95%CI, 0.83-2.18; P = 0.22), or for any coronary revascularization (HR, 1.64; 95%CI, 0.87-3.06; P = 0.11). After optimal IVUS-guided multivessel PCI with a target lesion in the LAD, 1-year risk of MACCE or coronary revascularization in patients with complex PCI was numerically higher than that in patients with non-complex PCI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics
Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics (CVIT) is an international journal covering the field of cardiovascular disease and includes cardiac (coronary and noncoronary) and peripheral interventions and therapeutics. Articles are subject to peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability. CVIT is an official journal of The Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信