快速消费品初级包装材料利用效率研究

IF 1.5 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Cihat Yilmaz, Prof. Dr. Kajetan Müller, Laura Blanke, Verena Dorn, Teresa Rohrmeier, Konstantin Schinkel, Cornelia Tischler, Maryam Vafaieshoar, Tanja Fell, Prof. Dr. Sven Sängerlaub
{"title":"快速消费品初级包装材料利用效率研究","authors":"Cihat Yilmaz,&nbsp;Prof. Dr. Kajetan Müller,&nbsp;Laura Blanke,&nbsp;Verena Dorn,&nbsp;Teresa Rohrmeier,&nbsp;Konstantin Schinkel,&nbsp;Cornelia Tischler,&nbsp;Maryam Vafaieshoar,&nbsp;Tanja Fell,&nbsp;Prof. Dr. Sven Sängerlaub","doi":"10.1002/cite.202400013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To make different packages with various filling quantities better comparable for their packaging material use, in this study the packaging material use efficiency was defined as the ratio of fill good amount to the packaging weight. Several hundred rigid packages (tubes, bottles, cans, and carton packages) for liquid and higher-viscous fast-moving consumer goods, e.g., beverages and personal care products, were analyzed (weight) and more than &gt;1000 data sets were taken from packaging suppliers of glass and PET packaging. As expected, glass packaging is heavier than PET packaging by a factor of around 10, and with a higher filling volume less packaging per amount of food is required. The material use efficiency of glass and PET bottles can differ by up to a factor of 3 within one filling quantity. The results are relevant for calculating life cycle assessments (LCAs) and selection of material efficient packaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":9912,"journal":{"name":"Chemie Ingenieur Technik","volume":"97 4","pages":"269-277"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cite.202400013","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Material Use Efficiency of Primary Packaging of Fast-Moving Consumer Goods\",\"authors\":\"Cihat Yilmaz,&nbsp;Prof. Dr. Kajetan Müller,&nbsp;Laura Blanke,&nbsp;Verena Dorn,&nbsp;Teresa Rohrmeier,&nbsp;Konstantin Schinkel,&nbsp;Cornelia Tischler,&nbsp;Maryam Vafaieshoar,&nbsp;Tanja Fell,&nbsp;Prof. Dr. Sven Sängerlaub\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cite.202400013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>To make different packages with various filling quantities better comparable for their packaging material use, in this study the packaging material use efficiency was defined as the ratio of fill good amount to the packaging weight. Several hundred rigid packages (tubes, bottles, cans, and carton packages) for liquid and higher-viscous fast-moving consumer goods, e.g., beverages and personal care products, were analyzed (weight) and more than &gt;1000 data sets were taken from packaging suppliers of glass and PET packaging. As expected, glass packaging is heavier than PET packaging by a factor of around 10, and with a higher filling volume less packaging per amount of food is required. The material use efficiency of glass and PET bottles can differ by up to a factor of 3 within one filling quantity. The results are relevant for calculating life cycle assessments (LCAs) and selection of material efficient packaging.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9912,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemie Ingenieur Technik\",\"volume\":\"97 4\",\"pages\":\"269-277\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cite.202400013\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemie Ingenieur Technik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cite.202400013\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemie Ingenieur Technik","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cite.202400013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了使不同填充量的包装材料的使用具有更好的可比性,本研究将包装材料的使用效率定义为填充量与包装重量的比值。对液体和高粘性快速消费品(如饮料和个人护理产品)的数百个刚性包装(管、瓶、罐和纸箱包装)进行了分析(重量),并从玻璃和PET包装供应商处获取了1000多个数据集。正如预期的那样,玻璃包装比PET包装重10倍左右,并且由于填充体积更高,每数量的食品需要更少的包装。玻璃和PET瓶的材料使用效率在一个灌装量内可以相差3倍。研究结果对于计算生命周期评价(lca)和选择高效材料包装具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Material Use Efficiency of Primary Packaging of Fast-Moving Consumer Goods

Material Use Efficiency of Primary Packaging of Fast-Moving Consumer Goods

To make different packages with various filling quantities better comparable for their packaging material use, in this study the packaging material use efficiency was defined as the ratio of fill good amount to the packaging weight. Several hundred rigid packages (tubes, bottles, cans, and carton packages) for liquid and higher-viscous fast-moving consumer goods, e.g., beverages and personal care products, were analyzed (weight) and more than >1000 data sets were taken from packaging suppliers of glass and PET packaging. As expected, glass packaging is heavier than PET packaging by a factor of around 10, and with a higher filling volume less packaging per amount of food is required. The material use efficiency of glass and PET bottles can differ by up to a factor of 3 within one filling quantity. The results are relevant for calculating life cycle assessments (LCAs) and selection of material efficient packaging.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chemie Ingenieur Technik
Chemie Ingenieur Technik 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
15.80%
发文量
601
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Die Chemie Ingenieur Technik ist die wohl angesehenste deutschsprachige Zeitschrift für Verfahrensingenieure, technische Chemiker, Apparatebauer und Biotechnologen. Als Fachorgan von DECHEMA, GDCh und VDI-GVC gilt sie als das unverzichtbare Forum für den Erfahrungsaustausch zwischen Forschern und Anwendern aus Industrie, Forschung und Entwicklung. Wissenschaftlicher Fortschritt und Praxisnähe: Eine Kombination, die es nur in der CIT gibt!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信