黑人乳腺癌幸存者的歧视经历与生活质量之间的关系

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Cancer Pub Date : 2025-04-07 DOI:10.1002/cncr.35836
Nur Zeinomar PhD MPH, Marley Perlstein MS, Bo Qin PhD, Hari S. Iyer ScD, Jesse J. Plascak PhD, Coral O. Omene MD PhD, Christine B. Ambrosone PhD, Kitaw Demissie MD PhD, Chi-Chen Hong PhD, Elisa V. Bandera MD PhD
{"title":"黑人乳腺癌幸存者的歧视经历与生活质量之间的关系","authors":"Nur Zeinomar PhD MPH,&nbsp;Marley Perlstein MS,&nbsp;Bo Qin PhD,&nbsp;Hari S. Iyer ScD,&nbsp;Jesse J. Plascak PhD,&nbsp;Coral O. Omene MD PhD,&nbsp;Christine B. Ambrosone PhD,&nbsp;Kitaw Demissie MD PhD,&nbsp;Chi-Chen Hong PhD,&nbsp;Elisa V. Bandera MD PhD","doi":"10.1002/cncr.35836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Racial discrimination has been associated with decreased health-related quality of life (QOL) in the general population; however, its impact on QOL in cancer survivors is unclear. This study aims to examine how experiences of discrimination (EOD) impact QOL in breast cancer survivors and whether these associations vary by individual- and structural-level factors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The association of EOD assessed at baseline (∼12 months post-diagnosis) was assessed in the Women’s Circle of Health Follow-up Study, a population-based longitudinal cohort study of Black breast cancer survivors in New Jersey. QOL was assessed at follow-up (∼24 months postdiagnosis) using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Breast (FACT-B). Multivariable linear regression models adjusted for confounders assessed the association of EOD (none, low, high) with QOL. We also examined statistical interaction by individual-level factors (coping and spirituality) and structural-level factors (neighborhood socioeconomic status and residential segregation).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 216 study participants, 74% reported experiencing discrimination. In fully adjusted models, women with high EOD had lower overall QOL (no discrimination, mean FACT-B: 114.8; 95% CI, 107.9–121.7; high discrimination, mean FACT-B: 101.1; 95% CI, 94.2–108.0). Although no evidence was observed of statistically significant interaction, women with high spirituality had better overall QOL, regardless of EOD (high spirituality/low discrimination: 128.2; 95% CI, 121.9–134.5; high spirituality/high discrimination: 115.4; 95% CI, 108.5–122.3; low spirituality/no discrimination: 103.5; 95% CI, 93.8–113.2).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Among Black breast cancer survivors, discrimination was associated with poorer QOL. Spirituality may mitigate the harmful effects, as women with high spirituality, even in the context of high discrimination, reported higher QOL.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":138,"journal":{"name":"Cancer","volume":"131 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cncr.35836","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations between experiences of discrimination and quality of life in Black breast cancer survivors\",\"authors\":\"Nur Zeinomar PhD MPH,&nbsp;Marley Perlstein MS,&nbsp;Bo Qin PhD,&nbsp;Hari S. Iyer ScD,&nbsp;Jesse J. Plascak PhD,&nbsp;Coral O. Omene MD PhD,&nbsp;Christine B. Ambrosone PhD,&nbsp;Kitaw Demissie MD PhD,&nbsp;Chi-Chen Hong PhD,&nbsp;Elisa V. Bandera MD PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cncr.35836\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Racial discrimination has been associated with decreased health-related quality of life (QOL) in the general population; however, its impact on QOL in cancer survivors is unclear. This study aims to examine how experiences of discrimination (EOD) impact QOL in breast cancer survivors and whether these associations vary by individual- and structural-level factors.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The association of EOD assessed at baseline (∼12 months post-diagnosis) was assessed in the Women’s Circle of Health Follow-up Study, a population-based longitudinal cohort study of Black breast cancer survivors in New Jersey. QOL was assessed at follow-up (∼24 months postdiagnosis) using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Breast (FACT-B). Multivariable linear regression models adjusted for confounders assessed the association of EOD (none, low, high) with QOL. We also examined statistical interaction by individual-level factors (coping and spirituality) and structural-level factors (neighborhood socioeconomic status and residential segregation).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Of 216 study participants, 74% reported experiencing discrimination. In fully adjusted models, women with high EOD had lower overall QOL (no discrimination, mean FACT-B: 114.8; 95% CI, 107.9–121.7; high discrimination, mean FACT-B: 101.1; 95% CI, 94.2–108.0). Although no evidence was observed of statistically significant interaction, women with high spirituality had better overall QOL, regardless of EOD (high spirituality/low discrimination: 128.2; 95% CI, 121.9–134.5; high spirituality/high discrimination: 115.4; 95% CI, 108.5–122.3; low spirituality/no discrimination: 103.5; 95% CI, 93.8–113.2).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Among Black breast cancer survivors, discrimination was associated with poorer QOL. Spirituality may mitigate the harmful effects, as women with high spirituality, even in the context of high discrimination, reported higher QOL.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer\",\"volume\":\"131 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cncr.35836\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.35836\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.35836","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景种族歧视与一般人群健康相关生活质量(QOL)下降有关;然而,它对癌症幸存者生活质量的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨歧视经历(EOD)如何影响乳腺癌幸存者的生活质量,以及这些关联是否因个体和结构水平因素而异。方法在妇女健康随访研究中评估基线(诊断后12个月)评估EOD的相关性,这是一项基于新泽西州黑人乳腺癌幸存者的人群纵向队列研究。在随访时(诊断后24个月)使用乳腺癌治疗功能评估(FACT-B)评估生活质量。校正混杂因素的多变量线性回归模型评估了EOD(无、低、高)与生活质量的关系。我们还研究了个体水平因素(应对和精神)和结构水平因素(社区社会经济地位和居住隔离)的统计相互作用。结果在216名研究参与者中,74%的人表示遭受过歧视。在完全调整的模型中,高EOD的女性总体生活质量较低(无歧视,平均FACT-B: 114.8;95% ci, 107.9-121.7;高歧视,平均FACT-B: 101.1;95% ci, 94.2-108.0)。尽管没有观察到统计学上显著的相互作用,但无论EOD如何,高灵性的女性总体生活质量更好(高灵性/低歧视:128.2;95% ci, 121.9-134.5;高灵性/高辨别力:115.4;95% ci, 108.5-122.3;低灵性/无歧视:103.5;95% ci, 93.8-113.2)。结论在黑人乳腺癌幸存者中,歧视与较差的生活质量相关。灵性可能会减轻有害影响,因为灵性高的女性,即使在高度歧视的背景下,也报告了更高的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Associations between experiences of discrimination and quality of life in Black breast cancer survivors

Associations between experiences of discrimination and quality of life in Black breast cancer survivors

Associations between experiences of discrimination and quality of life in Black breast cancer survivors

Associations between experiences of discrimination and quality of life in Black breast cancer survivors

Background

Racial discrimination has been associated with decreased health-related quality of life (QOL) in the general population; however, its impact on QOL in cancer survivors is unclear. This study aims to examine how experiences of discrimination (EOD) impact QOL in breast cancer survivors and whether these associations vary by individual- and structural-level factors.

Methods

The association of EOD assessed at baseline (∼12 months post-diagnosis) was assessed in the Women’s Circle of Health Follow-up Study, a population-based longitudinal cohort study of Black breast cancer survivors in New Jersey. QOL was assessed at follow-up (∼24 months postdiagnosis) using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Breast (FACT-B). Multivariable linear regression models adjusted for confounders assessed the association of EOD (none, low, high) with QOL. We also examined statistical interaction by individual-level factors (coping and spirituality) and structural-level factors (neighborhood socioeconomic status and residential segregation).

Results

Of 216 study participants, 74% reported experiencing discrimination. In fully adjusted models, women with high EOD had lower overall QOL (no discrimination, mean FACT-B: 114.8; 95% CI, 107.9–121.7; high discrimination, mean FACT-B: 101.1; 95% CI, 94.2–108.0). Although no evidence was observed of statistically significant interaction, women with high spirituality had better overall QOL, regardless of EOD (high spirituality/low discrimination: 128.2; 95% CI, 121.9–134.5; high spirituality/high discrimination: 115.4; 95% CI, 108.5–122.3; low spirituality/no discrimination: 103.5; 95% CI, 93.8–113.2).

Conclusions

Among Black breast cancer survivors, discrimination was associated with poorer QOL. Spirituality may mitigate the harmful effects, as women with high spirituality, even in the context of high discrimination, reported higher QOL.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer
Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
3.20%
发文量
480
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The CANCER site is a full-text, electronic implementation of CANCER, an Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society, and CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, a Journal of the American Cancer Society. CANCER publishes interdisciplinary oncologic information according to, but not limited to, the following disease sites and disciplines: blood/bone marrow; breast disease; endocrine disorders; epidemiology; gastrointestinal tract; genitourinary disease; gynecologic oncology; head and neck disease; hepatobiliary tract; integrated medicine; lung disease; medical oncology; neuro-oncology; pathology radiation oncology; translational research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信