商业送礼的道德规范:来自“第一人称”判断的类型学

IF 1.8 Q3 BUSINESS
Diego Arias, Domenèc Melé
{"title":"商业送礼的道德规范:来自“第一人称”判断的类型学","authors":"Diego Arias,&nbsp;Domenèc Melé","doi":"10.1111/basr.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Most ethical studies on gift giving in business are limited to the application of rationalist ethical principles through a “third-person” judgment to condemn certain practices such as bribes or manipulative actions, or to question the morality of certain commercial gifts or actions in corporate philanthropy. Such ethical analyses are generally based on extrinsic principles that lead to a dichotomous discussion on the morality of gift-giving in terms of ethically acceptable and unacceptable gifts. Much less attention has been paid to the gift giver's “first-person” moral judgment. Thus, this paper contributes to this vacuum by drawing from Thomas Aquinas's approach to internal human acts and their moral evaluation. One of Aquinas's crucial points is his distinction between the object chosen (<i>finis operis</i>) and the intention of the agent (<i>finis operantis</i>) as a structural mental unity. From this perspective, the paper proposes a typology of gift giving, which aids reflection when making personal moral judgments in a variety of situations. Accompanied by illustrative examples, eight types of gift-giving acts are identified and grouped into three categories: ethically unacceptable giving (bribery and manipulative and malevolent gifts), ethically acceptable giving (instrumental and reciprocal gifts), and ethically excellent giving (gratitude, gratuitous, and solidarity gifts).</p>","PeriodicalId":46747,"journal":{"name":"BUSINESS AND SOCIETY REVIEW","volume":"130 1","pages":"18-41"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moral specification of gift giving in business: A typology from a “first-person” judgment\",\"authors\":\"Diego Arias,&nbsp;Domenèc Melé\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/basr.70001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Most ethical studies on gift giving in business are limited to the application of rationalist ethical principles through a “third-person” judgment to condemn certain practices such as bribes or manipulative actions, or to question the morality of certain commercial gifts or actions in corporate philanthropy. Such ethical analyses are generally based on extrinsic principles that lead to a dichotomous discussion on the morality of gift-giving in terms of ethically acceptable and unacceptable gifts. Much less attention has been paid to the gift giver's “first-person” moral judgment. Thus, this paper contributes to this vacuum by drawing from Thomas Aquinas's approach to internal human acts and their moral evaluation. One of Aquinas's crucial points is his distinction between the object chosen (<i>finis operis</i>) and the intention of the agent (<i>finis operantis</i>) as a structural mental unity. From this perspective, the paper proposes a typology of gift giving, which aids reflection when making personal moral judgments in a variety of situations. Accompanied by illustrative examples, eight types of gift-giving acts are identified and grouped into three categories: ethically unacceptable giving (bribery and manipulative and malevolent gifts), ethically acceptable giving (instrumental and reciprocal gifts), and ethically excellent giving (gratitude, gratuitous, and solidarity gifts).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BUSINESS AND SOCIETY REVIEW\",\"volume\":\"130 1\",\"pages\":\"18-41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BUSINESS AND SOCIETY REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/basr.70001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BUSINESS AND SOCIETY REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/basr.70001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大多数关于商业送礼的伦理研究都局限于运用理性主义伦理原则,通过“第三人称”判断来谴责某些行为,如贿赂或操纵行为,或质疑某些商业礼物或企业慈善行为的道德。这种伦理分析通常基于外在原则,导致在道德上可接受和不可接受的礼物方面对送礼的道德进行二分讨论。很少有人关注送礼者的“第一人称”道德判断。因此,本文通过借鉴托马斯·阿奎那对人类内在行为及其道德评价的方法来填补这一真空。阿奎那的关键观点之一是他将选择的客体(finis operis)和作为结构精神统一的主体(finis operantis)的意图区分开来。从这个角度出发,本文提出了送礼的类型,这有助于在各种情况下进行个人道德判断时进行反思。通过举例说明,本文确定了八种送礼行为,并将其分为三类:道德上不可接受的赠与(贿赂、操纵和恶意赠与)、道德上可接受的赠与(工具性和互惠性赠与)和道德上优秀的赠与(感激、无偿和团结赠与)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Moral specification of gift giving in business: A typology from a “first-person” judgment

Most ethical studies on gift giving in business are limited to the application of rationalist ethical principles through a “third-person” judgment to condemn certain practices such as bribes or manipulative actions, or to question the morality of certain commercial gifts or actions in corporate philanthropy. Such ethical analyses are generally based on extrinsic principles that lead to a dichotomous discussion on the morality of gift-giving in terms of ethically acceptable and unacceptable gifts. Much less attention has been paid to the gift giver's “first-person” moral judgment. Thus, this paper contributes to this vacuum by drawing from Thomas Aquinas's approach to internal human acts and their moral evaluation. One of Aquinas's crucial points is his distinction between the object chosen (finis operis) and the intention of the agent (finis operantis) as a structural mental unity. From this perspective, the paper proposes a typology of gift giving, which aids reflection when making personal moral judgments in a variety of situations. Accompanied by illustrative examples, eight types of gift-giving acts are identified and grouped into three categories: ethically unacceptable giving (bribery and manipulative and malevolent gifts), ethically acceptable giving (instrumental and reciprocal gifts), and ethically excellent giving (gratitude, gratuitous, and solidarity gifts).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
10.50%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Business and Society Review addresses a wide range of ethical issues concerning the relationships between business, society, and the public good. Its contents are of vital concern to business people, academics, and others involved in the contemporary debate about the proper role of business in society. The journal publishes papers from all those working in this important area, including researchers and business professionals, members of the legal profession, government administrators and many others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信