动态和静态结构-功能耦合与机器学习用于阿尔茨海默病的早期检测

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Han Wu, Yinping Lu, Luyao Wang, Jinglong Wu, Ying Liu, Zhilin Zhang
{"title":"动态和静态结构-功能耦合与机器学习用于阿尔茨海默病的早期检测","authors":"Han Wu,&nbsp;Yinping Lu,&nbsp;Luyao Wang,&nbsp;Jinglong Wu,&nbsp;Ying Liu,&nbsp;Zhilin Zhang","doi":"10.1002/hbm.70202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD) involves complex changes in brain structure and function that are driven by their interaction, making structure–function coupling (SFC) a valuable indicator for early detection of AD. Static SFC refers to the overall structure–function interaction, whereas dynamic SFC refers to transient coupling variations. In this study, we aimed to assess the potential of combining static and dynamic SFC with machine learning (ML) for the early detection of AD. We analyzed a discovery cohort and an external validation cohort, including AD, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and healthy control (HC) groups. Then, we quantified differences between static SFC and dynamic SFC at different stages of AD progression. Feature selection was performed using ElasticNet. A Gaussian naive Bayes (GNB) classifier was used to test the ability of SFC to classify AD stages. We also analyzed the correlations between SFC features and early AD physiological biomarkers. Static SFC increased with AD progression, whereas dynamic SFC showed greater variability and decreased stability. Using SFC features selected by ElasticNet, the GNB classifier achieved high performance in differentiating between the HC and MCI stages (area under the curve [AUC] = 91.1%) and between the MCI and AD stages (AUC = 89.03%). Significant correlations were found between SFC features and physiological biomarkers. The combined use of SFC features and ML has strong potential value for the accurate classification of AD stages and significant potential value for the early detection of AD. This study demonstrates that combining static and dynamic SFC with ML provides a novel perspective for understanding the mechanisms of AD and contributes to improving its early detection.</p>","PeriodicalId":13019,"journal":{"name":"Human Brain Mapping","volume":"46 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hbm.70202","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dynamic and Static Structure–Function Coupling With Machine Learning for the Early Detection of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"authors\":\"Han Wu,&nbsp;Yinping Lu,&nbsp;Luyao Wang,&nbsp;Jinglong Wu,&nbsp;Ying Liu,&nbsp;Zhilin Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hbm.70202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD) involves complex changes in brain structure and function that are driven by their interaction, making structure–function coupling (SFC) a valuable indicator for early detection of AD. Static SFC refers to the overall structure–function interaction, whereas dynamic SFC refers to transient coupling variations. In this study, we aimed to assess the potential of combining static and dynamic SFC with machine learning (ML) for the early detection of AD. We analyzed a discovery cohort and an external validation cohort, including AD, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and healthy control (HC) groups. Then, we quantified differences between static SFC and dynamic SFC at different stages of AD progression. Feature selection was performed using ElasticNet. A Gaussian naive Bayes (GNB) classifier was used to test the ability of SFC to classify AD stages. We also analyzed the correlations between SFC features and early AD physiological biomarkers. Static SFC increased with AD progression, whereas dynamic SFC showed greater variability and decreased stability. Using SFC features selected by ElasticNet, the GNB classifier achieved high performance in differentiating between the HC and MCI stages (area under the curve [AUC] = 91.1%) and between the MCI and AD stages (AUC = 89.03%). Significant correlations were found between SFC features and physiological biomarkers. The combined use of SFC features and ML has strong potential value for the accurate classification of AD stages and significant potential value for the early detection of AD. This study demonstrates that combining static and dynamic SFC with ML provides a novel perspective for understanding the mechanisms of AD and contributes to improving its early detection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Brain Mapping\",\"volume\":\"46 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hbm.70202\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Brain Mapping\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.70202\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Brain Mapping","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.70202","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

阿尔茨海默病(AD)的进展涉及大脑结构和功能的复杂变化,这些变化是由它们的相互作用驱动的,因此结构-功能耦合(SFC)是早期发现AD的有价值的指标。静态SFC是指整体的结构-功能相互作用,而动态SFC是指瞬态耦合变化。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估将静态和动态SFC与机器学习(ML)相结合用于AD早期检测的潜力。我们分析了一个发现队列和一个外部验证队列,包括AD、轻度认知障碍(MCI)组和健康对照组(HC)组。然后,我们量化了AD不同发展阶段的静态SFC和动态SFC之间的差异。使用ElasticNet进行特征选择。使用高斯朴素贝叶斯(GNB)分类器来测试SFC对AD分期的分类能力。我们还分析了SFC特征与早期AD生理生物标志物之间的相关性。静态SFC随着AD的进展而增加,而动态SFC表现出更大的变异性和稳定性下降。使用ElasticNet选择的SFC特征,GNB分类器在区分HC和MCI阶段(曲线下面积[AUC] = 91.1%)和MCI和AD阶段(AUC = 89.03%)方面取得了高性能。SFC特征与生理生物标志物之间存在显著相关性。SFC特征与ML结合使用对AD的准确分期具有很强的潜在价值,对AD的早期发现具有重要的潜在价值。该研究表明,将静态和动态SFC与ML相结合,为理解AD的机制提供了一个新的视角,有助于提高AD的早期发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Dynamic and Static Structure–Function Coupling With Machine Learning for the Early Detection of Alzheimer's Disease

Dynamic and Static Structure–Function Coupling With Machine Learning for the Early Detection of Alzheimer's Disease

The progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD) involves complex changes in brain structure and function that are driven by their interaction, making structure–function coupling (SFC) a valuable indicator for early detection of AD. Static SFC refers to the overall structure–function interaction, whereas dynamic SFC refers to transient coupling variations. In this study, we aimed to assess the potential of combining static and dynamic SFC with machine learning (ML) for the early detection of AD. We analyzed a discovery cohort and an external validation cohort, including AD, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and healthy control (HC) groups. Then, we quantified differences between static SFC and dynamic SFC at different stages of AD progression. Feature selection was performed using ElasticNet. A Gaussian naive Bayes (GNB) classifier was used to test the ability of SFC to classify AD stages. We also analyzed the correlations between SFC features and early AD physiological biomarkers. Static SFC increased with AD progression, whereas dynamic SFC showed greater variability and decreased stability. Using SFC features selected by ElasticNet, the GNB classifier achieved high performance in differentiating between the HC and MCI stages (area under the curve [AUC] = 91.1%) and between the MCI and AD stages (AUC = 89.03%). Significant correlations were found between SFC features and physiological biomarkers. The combined use of SFC features and ML has strong potential value for the accurate classification of AD stages and significant potential value for the early detection of AD. This study demonstrates that combining static and dynamic SFC with ML provides a novel perspective for understanding the mechanisms of AD and contributes to improving its early detection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human Brain Mapping
Human Brain Mapping 医学-核医学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
401
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Human Brain Mapping publishes peer-reviewed basic, clinical, technical, and theoretical research in the interdisciplinary and rapidly expanding field of human brain mapping. The journal features research derived from non-invasive brain imaging modalities used to explore the spatial and temporal organization of the neural systems supporting human behavior. Imaging modalities of interest include positron emission tomography, event-related potentials, electro-and magnetoencephalography, magnetic resonance imaging, and single-photon emission tomography. Brain mapping research in both normal and clinical populations is encouraged. Article formats include Research Articles, Review Articles, Clinical Case Studies, and Technique, as well as Technological Developments, Theoretical Articles, and Synthetic Reviews. Technical advances, such as novel brain imaging methods, analyses for detecting or localizing neural activity, synergistic uses of multiple imaging modalities, and strategies for the design of behavioral paradigms and neural-systems modeling are of particular interest. The journal endorses the propagation of methodological standards and encourages database development in the field of human brain mapping.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信