{"title":"动态和静态结构-功能耦合与机器学习用于阿尔茨海默病的早期检测","authors":"Han Wu, Yinping Lu, Luyao Wang, Jinglong Wu, Ying Liu, Zhilin Zhang","doi":"10.1002/hbm.70202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD) involves complex changes in brain structure and function that are driven by their interaction, making structure–function coupling (SFC) a valuable indicator for early detection of AD. Static SFC refers to the overall structure–function interaction, whereas dynamic SFC refers to transient coupling variations. In this study, we aimed to assess the potential of combining static and dynamic SFC with machine learning (ML) for the early detection of AD. We analyzed a discovery cohort and an external validation cohort, including AD, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and healthy control (HC) groups. Then, we quantified differences between static SFC and dynamic SFC at different stages of AD progression. Feature selection was performed using ElasticNet. A Gaussian naive Bayes (GNB) classifier was used to test the ability of SFC to classify AD stages. We also analyzed the correlations between SFC features and early AD physiological biomarkers. Static SFC increased with AD progression, whereas dynamic SFC showed greater variability and decreased stability. Using SFC features selected by ElasticNet, the GNB classifier achieved high performance in differentiating between the HC and MCI stages (area under the curve [AUC] = 91.1%) and between the MCI and AD stages (AUC = 89.03%). Significant correlations were found between SFC features and physiological biomarkers. The combined use of SFC features and ML has strong potential value for the accurate classification of AD stages and significant potential value for the early detection of AD. This study demonstrates that combining static and dynamic SFC with ML provides a novel perspective for understanding the mechanisms of AD and contributes to improving its early detection.</p>","PeriodicalId":13019,"journal":{"name":"Human Brain Mapping","volume":"46 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hbm.70202","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dynamic and Static Structure–Function Coupling With Machine Learning for the Early Detection of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"authors\":\"Han Wu, Yinping Lu, Luyao Wang, Jinglong Wu, Ying Liu, Zhilin Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hbm.70202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD) involves complex changes in brain structure and function that are driven by their interaction, making structure–function coupling (SFC) a valuable indicator for early detection of AD. Static SFC refers to the overall structure–function interaction, whereas dynamic SFC refers to transient coupling variations. In this study, we aimed to assess the potential of combining static and dynamic SFC with machine learning (ML) for the early detection of AD. We analyzed a discovery cohort and an external validation cohort, including AD, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and healthy control (HC) groups. Then, we quantified differences between static SFC and dynamic SFC at different stages of AD progression. Feature selection was performed using ElasticNet. A Gaussian naive Bayes (GNB) classifier was used to test the ability of SFC to classify AD stages. We also analyzed the correlations between SFC features and early AD physiological biomarkers. Static SFC increased with AD progression, whereas dynamic SFC showed greater variability and decreased stability. Using SFC features selected by ElasticNet, the GNB classifier achieved high performance in differentiating between the HC and MCI stages (area under the curve [AUC] = 91.1%) and between the MCI and AD stages (AUC = 89.03%). Significant correlations were found between SFC features and physiological biomarkers. The combined use of SFC features and ML has strong potential value for the accurate classification of AD stages and significant potential value for the early detection of AD. This study demonstrates that combining static and dynamic SFC with ML provides a novel perspective for understanding the mechanisms of AD and contributes to improving its early detection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Brain Mapping\",\"volume\":\"46 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/hbm.70202\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Brain Mapping\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.70202\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Brain Mapping","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.70202","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Dynamic and Static Structure–Function Coupling With Machine Learning for the Early Detection of Alzheimer's Disease
The progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD) involves complex changes in brain structure and function that are driven by their interaction, making structure–function coupling (SFC) a valuable indicator for early detection of AD. Static SFC refers to the overall structure–function interaction, whereas dynamic SFC refers to transient coupling variations. In this study, we aimed to assess the potential of combining static and dynamic SFC with machine learning (ML) for the early detection of AD. We analyzed a discovery cohort and an external validation cohort, including AD, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and healthy control (HC) groups. Then, we quantified differences between static SFC and dynamic SFC at different stages of AD progression. Feature selection was performed using ElasticNet. A Gaussian naive Bayes (GNB) classifier was used to test the ability of SFC to classify AD stages. We also analyzed the correlations between SFC features and early AD physiological biomarkers. Static SFC increased with AD progression, whereas dynamic SFC showed greater variability and decreased stability. Using SFC features selected by ElasticNet, the GNB classifier achieved high performance in differentiating between the HC and MCI stages (area under the curve [AUC] = 91.1%) and between the MCI and AD stages (AUC = 89.03%). Significant correlations were found between SFC features and physiological biomarkers. The combined use of SFC features and ML has strong potential value for the accurate classification of AD stages and significant potential value for the early detection of AD. This study demonstrates that combining static and dynamic SFC with ML provides a novel perspective for understanding the mechanisms of AD and contributes to improving its early detection.
期刊介绍:
Human Brain Mapping publishes peer-reviewed basic, clinical, technical, and theoretical research in the interdisciplinary and rapidly expanding field of human brain mapping. The journal features research derived from non-invasive brain imaging modalities used to explore the spatial and temporal organization of the neural systems supporting human behavior. Imaging modalities of interest include positron emission tomography, event-related potentials, electro-and magnetoencephalography, magnetic resonance imaging, and single-photon emission tomography. Brain mapping research in both normal and clinical populations is encouraged.
Article formats include Research Articles, Review Articles, Clinical Case Studies, and Technique, as well as Technological Developments, Theoretical Articles, and Synthetic Reviews. Technical advances, such as novel brain imaging methods, analyses for detecting or localizing neural activity, synergistic uses of multiple imaging modalities, and strategies for the design of behavioral paradigms and neural-systems modeling are of particular interest. The journal endorses the propagation of methodological standards and encourages database development in the field of human brain mapping.