慢性消耗性疾病朊病毒在鹿饲养者和野生动物访问鹿喂养地区

IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Miranda H. J. Huang, Steve Demarais, Marc D. Schwabenlander, Bronson K. Strickland, Kurt C. VerCauteren, William T. McKinley, Gage Rowden, Corina C. Valencia Tibbitts, Sarah C. Gresch, Stuart S. Lichtenberg, Tiffany M. Wolf, Peter A. Larsen
{"title":"慢性消耗性疾病朊病毒在鹿饲养者和野生动物访问鹿喂养地区","authors":"Miranda H. J. Huang,&nbsp;Steve Demarais,&nbsp;Marc D. Schwabenlander,&nbsp;Bronson K. Strickland,&nbsp;Kurt C. VerCauteren,&nbsp;William T. McKinley,&nbsp;Gage Rowden,&nbsp;Corina C. Valencia Tibbitts,&nbsp;Sarah C. Gresch,&nbsp;Stuart S. Lichtenberg,&nbsp;Tiffany M. Wolf,&nbsp;Peter A. Larsen","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Eliminating supplemental feeding is a common regulatory action within chronic wasting disease (CWD) management zones. These regulations target the potential for increased animal-animal contact and environmental contamination with CWD prions. Prions, the causative agent of CWD, have been detected on feeder surfaces in CWD-positive, captive deer facilities but not among free-ranging populations, and information on the relative risk of transmission at anthropogenic and natural food sources is limited. In this study, we established and maintained 13 gravity feeders from September 2022 to March 2023 in a CWD zone in northern Mississippi, USA (apparent prevalence ~30%). We set up feeders up in 3 ways: no exclusion (deer feeders, <i>n</i> = 7), exclusion of deer using fencing with holes cut at the ground-level to permit smaller wildlife to enter (raccoon feeders, <i>n</i> = 3), and environmental control feeders, which were fully fenced and not filled with feed (control feeders, <i>n</i> = 3). We swabbed feeder spouts at setup and at 4 intervals approximately 6 weeks apart to test for prion contamination via real-time quaking-induced conversion (RT-QuIC). We detected prions 12 weeks after setup on all deer and raccoon feeders. We compared relative transmission risk using camera traps at these feeders, 6 agronomic plantings for wildlife forage (i.e., food plots), and 7 oak mast trees. Weekly visitation rate by white-tailed deer (<i>Odocoileus virginianus</i>; hereafter: deer) differed (<i>P</i> = 0.02) among deer feeders (median = 24.5 deer/week, range = 15.6–65.7), food plots (median = 12.7, range = 3.8–24.7), and mast trees (median = 2.0, range = 0.4–5.1). Contact rates between individual deer also differed between site types (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.01): deer feeders (median = 2.1 deer-to-deer contacts/week, range = 0–10.1), food plots (median = 0.1, range = 0–4.0), and mast trees (median = 0, range = 0–0.3). Raccoons also visited feeders at greater rates than food plots and mast trees (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.04). Finally, we swabbed 19 feeders in 2 areas where CWD was newly detected, finding prion contamination on swabs from 4 feeders. We show that deer feeders in free-ranging populations with high CWD prevalence become contaminated with CWD prions quickly, becoming a potential site of exposure of deer to CWD prions. Our results also demonstrate the ability to find evidence of prion contamination on deer feeders, even in areas where CWD is newly detected.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jwmg.70000","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chronic wasting disease prions on deer feeders and wildlife visitation to deer feeding areas\",\"authors\":\"Miranda H. J. Huang,&nbsp;Steve Demarais,&nbsp;Marc D. Schwabenlander,&nbsp;Bronson K. Strickland,&nbsp;Kurt C. VerCauteren,&nbsp;William T. McKinley,&nbsp;Gage Rowden,&nbsp;Corina C. Valencia Tibbitts,&nbsp;Sarah C. Gresch,&nbsp;Stuart S. Lichtenberg,&nbsp;Tiffany M. Wolf,&nbsp;Peter A. Larsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jwmg.70000\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Eliminating supplemental feeding is a common regulatory action within chronic wasting disease (CWD) management zones. These regulations target the potential for increased animal-animal contact and environmental contamination with CWD prions. Prions, the causative agent of CWD, have been detected on feeder surfaces in CWD-positive, captive deer facilities but not among free-ranging populations, and information on the relative risk of transmission at anthropogenic and natural food sources is limited. In this study, we established and maintained 13 gravity feeders from September 2022 to March 2023 in a CWD zone in northern Mississippi, USA (apparent prevalence ~30%). We set up feeders up in 3 ways: no exclusion (deer feeders, <i>n</i> = 7), exclusion of deer using fencing with holes cut at the ground-level to permit smaller wildlife to enter (raccoon feeders, <i>n</i> = 3), and environmental control feeders, which were fully fenced and not filled with feed (control feeders, <i>n</i> = 3). We swabbed feeder spouts at setup and at 4 intervals approximately 6 weeks apart to test for prion contamination via real-time quaking-induced conversion (RT-QuIC). We detected prions 12 weeks after setup on all deer and raccoon feeders. We compared relative transmission risk using camera traps at these feeders, 6 agronomic plantings for wildlife forage (i.e., food plots), and 7 oak mast trees. Weekly visitation rate by white-tailed deer (<i>Odocoileus virginianus</i>; hereafter: deer) differed (<i>P</i> = 0.02) among deer feeders (median = 24.5 deer/week, range = 15.6–65.7), food plots (median = 12.7, range = 3.8–24.7), and mast trees (median = 2.0, range = 0.4–5.1). Contact rates between individual deer also differed between site types (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.01): deer feeders (median = 2.1 deer-to-deer contacts/week, range = 0–10.1), food plots (median = 0.1, range = 0–4.0), and mast trees (median = 0, range = 0–0.3). Raccoons also visited feeders at greater rates than food plots and mast trees (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.04). Finally, we swabbed 19 feeders in 2 areas where CWD was newly detected, finding prion contamination on swabs from 4 feeders. We show that deer feeders in free-ranging populations with high CWD prevalence become contaminated with CWD prions quickly, becoming a potential site of exposure of deer to CWD prions. Our results also demonstrate the ability to find evidence of prion contamination on deer feeders, even in areas where CWD is newly detected.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Wildlife Management\",\"volume\":\"89 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jwmg.70000\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Wildlife Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.70000\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wildlife Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.70000","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在慢性消耗性疾病(CWD)管理区内,取消补充喂养是一种常见的监管行动。这些法规的目标是可能增加动物与动物接触和CWD朊病毒的环境污染。在CWD阳性圈养鹿设施的喂食器表面上发现了导致CWD的朊病毒,但在自由放养的鹿群中没有发现,而且关于在人为和天然食物来源传播的相对风险的信息有限。在这项研究中,我们于2022年9月至2023年3月在美国密西西比州北部的一个CWD区建立并维持了13个重力喂食器(表观患病率~30%)。我们以3种方式设置喂食器:不排除(鹿喂食器,n = 7),通过在地面开洞的围栏来排除鹿(浣熊喂食器,n = 3),以及环境控制喂食器,它们完全被围栏围起来,没有装满饲料(控制喂食器,n = 3)。我们每隔大约6周的时间,每隔4次对喂料器喷嘴进行抽拭,通过实时地震诱导转换(RT-QuIC)测试朊病毒污染。12周后,我们在所有的鹿和浣熊喂食器上检测到朊病毒。我们在这些喂食者、6种用于野生动物饲料的农艺种植(即食物田)和7棵橡树桅杆树上使用相机陷阱比较了相对传播风险。白尾鹿(Odocoileus virginianus)每周到访率;喂食者(中位数为24.5只/周,范围为15.6 ~ 65.7只)、食物区(中位数为12.7只,范围为3.8 ~ 24.7只)和主树(中位数为2.0只,范围为0.4 ~ 5.1只)之间差异显著(P = 0.02)。个体鹿之间的接触率在不同的地点类型之间也存在差异(P < 0.01):鹿饲养者(中位数= 2.1次/周,范围为0 - 10.1次)、食物区(中位数= 0.1次,范围为0 - 4.0次)和主树(中位数= 0,范围为0 - 0.3次)。浣熊访问喂食器的频率也高于食物地和桅杆树(P < 0.04)。最后,我们对新发现CWD的2个地区的19只喂食动物进行了棉签取样,在4只喂食动物的棉签上发现了朊病毒污染。我们发现,在CWD高流行的自由放养种群中,鹿的喂食者很快就会被CWD朊病毒污染,成为鹿接触CWD朊病毒的潜在场所。我们的研究结果还证明了在鹿饲养者身上发现朊病毒污染证据的能力,即使是在新发现CWD的地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Chronic wasting disease prions on deer feeders and wildlife visitation to deer feeding areas

Chronic wasting disease prions on deer feeders and wildlife visitation to deer feeding areas

Eliminating supplemental feeding is a common regulatory action within chronic wasting disease (CWD) management zones. These regulations target the potential for increased animal-animal contact and environmental contamination with CWD prions. Prions, the causative agent of CWD, have been detected on feeder surfaces in CWD-positive, captive deer facilities but not among free-ranging populations, and information on the relative risk of transmission at anthropogenic and natural food sources is limited. In this study, we established and maintained 13 gravity feeders from September 2022 to March 2023 in a CWD zone in northern Mississippi, USA (apparent prevalence ~30%). We set up feeders up in 3 ways: no exclusion (deer feeders, n = 7), exclusion of deer using fencing with holes cut at the ground-level to permit smaller wildlife to enter (raccoon feeders, n = 3), and environmental control feeders, which were fully fenced and not filled with feed (control feeders, n = 3). We swabbed feeder spouts at setup and at 4 intervals approximately 6 weeks apart to test for prion contamination via real-time quaking-induced conversion (RT-QuIC). We detected prions 12 weeks after setup on all deer and raccoon feeders. We compared relative transmission risk using camera traps at these feeders, 6 agronomic plantings for wildlife forage (i.e., food plots), and 7 oak mast trees. Weekly visitation rate by white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus; hereafter: deer) differed (P = 0.02) among deer feeders (median = 24.5 deer/week, range = 15.6–65.7), food plots (median = 12.7, range = 3.8–24.7), and mast trees (median = 2.0, range = 0.4–5.1). Contact rates between individual deer also differed between site types (P < 0.01): deer feeders (median = 2.1 deer-to-deer contacts/week, range = 0–10.1), food plots (median = 0.1, range = 0–4.0), and mast trees (median = 0, range = 0–0.3). Raccoons also visited feeders at greater rates than food plots and mast trees (P < 0.04). Finally, we swabbed 19 feeders in 2 areas where CWD was newly detected, finding prion contamination on swabs from 4 feeders. We show that deer feeders in free-ranging populations with high CWD prevalence become contaminated with CWD prions quickly, becoming a potential site of exposure of deer to CWD prions. Our results also demonstrate the ability to find evidence of prion contamination on deer feeders, even in areas where CWD is newly detected.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Wildlife Management
Journal of Wildlife Management 环境科学-动物学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
188
审稿时长
9-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Wildlife Management publishes manuscripts containing information from original research that contributes to basic wildlife science. Suitable topics include investigations into the biology and ecology of wildlife and their habitats that has direct or indirect implications for wildlife management and conservation. This includes basic information on wildlife habitat use, reproduction, genetics, demographics, viability, predator-prey relationships, space-use, movements, behavior, and physiology; but within the context of contemporary management and conservation issues such that the knowledge may ultimately be useful to wildlife practitioners. Also considered are theoretical and conceptual aspects of wildlife science, including development of new approaches to quantitative analyses, modeling of wildlife populations and habitats, and other topics that are germane to advancing wildlife science. Limited reviews or meta analyses will be considered if they provide a meaningful new synthesis or perspective on an appropriate subject. Direct evaluation of management practices or policies should be sent to the Wildlife Society Bulletin, as should papers reporting new tools or techniques. However, papers that report new tools or techniques, or effects of management practices, within the context of a broader study investigating basic wildlife biology and ecology will be considered by The Journal of Wildlife Management. Book reviews of relevant topics in basic wildlife research and biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信