Alan A. Sag , Ernest Barral , James Ronald , Jeremy Force , Nicole A. Larrier , Julia Visgauss , Charles Y. Kim
{"title":"在不间断的系统性癌症治疗中对骨、软组织和神经进行冷冻消融","authors":"Alan A. Sag , Ernest Barral , James Ronald , Jeremy Force , Nicole A. Larrier , Julia Visgauss , Charles Y. Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.clinimag.2025.110467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To assess safety of cryoablation in cancer patients receiving uninterrupted systemic cancer therapies with regard to wound healing.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>In this single-institution IRB-approved retrospective study, all patients (29/50 (58 %) female, mean age 61.9 +/− 11.3 years) undergoing cryoablation of bone, soft tissue, or nerve for symptomatic treatment while on uninterrupted systemic therapy between 2019 and 2022 were included for analysis. Charts were reviewed to identify post-cryoablation infection or wound healing complication within 90 days after cryoablation. All patients received routine prophylactic intraprocedural antibiotics; no patients were prescribed antibiotics post-procedure.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sixty-nine cryoablations of bone (42/69, 61 %), soft tissue (17/69, 25 %) and nerve (10/69,14 %) were performed without interrupting ongoing traditional chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, investigational clinical trial therapy, or hormone therapy in 32/69 (35 %), 26/69 (38 %), 14/69 (20 %), 5/69 (7 %) respectively. There were 3/69 (4 %) patients with neutropenia (defined as absolute neutrophil count <1500 cells/mL). Agents known to delay wound healing (such as VEGF/R, E/FGFR inhibitors) or chronic steroids were not interrupted in 9/69 (13 %) and 36/69 (52 %) respectively. Prior to cryoablation, the treatment zone was previously embolized in 8/69 (12 %) and irradiated in 34/69 (49 %). By mean clinical follow up of 41 days (range, 1–98 days post-cryoablation), no procedure-site infections nor wound healing complications occurred.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Wound healing abnormalities were not observed when performing percutaneous cryoablation with uninterrupted systemic therapies in this study, even in treatment zones that had received radiotherapy and embolization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50680,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Imaging","volume":"121 ","pages":"Article 110467"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cryoablation of bone, soft tissue, and nerve in the setting of uninterrupted systemic cancer therapies\",\"authors\":\"Alan A. Sag , Ernest Barral , James Ronald , Jeremy Force , Nicole A. Larrier , Julia Visgauss , Charles Y. Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinimag.2025.110467\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To assess safety of cryoablation in cancer patients receiving uninterrupted systemic cancer therapies with regard to wound healing.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>In this single-institution IRB-approved retrospective study, all patients (29/50 (58 %) female, mean age 61.9 +/− 11.3 years) undergoing cryoablation of bone, soft tissue, or nerve for symptomatic treatment while on uninterrupted systemic therapy between 2019 and 2022 were included for analysis. Charts were reviewed to identify post-cryoablation infection or wound healing complication within 90 days after cryoablation. All patients received routine prophylactic intraprocedural antibiotics; no patients were prescribed antibiotics post-procedure.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sixty-nine cryoablations of bone (42/69, 61 %), soft tissue (17/69, 25 %) and nerve (10/69,14 %) were performed without interrupting ongoing traditional chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, investigational clinical trial therapy, or hormone therapy in 32/69 (35 %), 26/69 (38 %), 14/69 (20 %), 5/69 (7 %) respectively. There were 3/69 (4 %) patients with neutropenia (defined as absolute neutrophil count <1500 cells/mL). Agents known to delay wound healing (such as VEGF/R, E/FGFR inhibitors) or chronic steroids were not interrupted in 9/69 (13 %) and 36/69 (52 %) respectively. Prior to cryoablation, the treatment zone was previously embolized in 8/69 (12 %) and irradiated in 34/69 (49 %). By mean clinical follow up of 41 days (range, 1–98 days post-cryoablation), no procedure-site infections nor wound healing complications occurred.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Wound healing abnormalities were not observed when performing percutaneous cryoablation with uninterrupted systemic therapies in this study, even in treatment zones that had received radiotherapy and embolization.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Imaging\",\"volume\":\"121 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110467\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899707125000671\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899707125000671","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cryoablation of bone, soft tissue, and nerve in the setting of uninterrupted systemic cancer therapies
Purpose
To assess safety of cryoablation in cancer patients receiving uninterrupted systemic cancer therapies with regard to wound healing.
Materials and methods
In this single-institution IRB-approved retrospective study, all patients (29/50 (58 %) female, mean age 61.9 +/− 11.3 years) undergoing cryoablation of bone, soft tissue, or nerve for symptomatic treatment while on uninterrupted systemic therapy between 2019 and 2022 were included for analysis. Charts were reviewed to identify post-cryoablation infection or wound healing complication within 90 days after cryoablation. All patients received routine prophylactic intraprocedural antibiotics; no patients were prescribed antibiotics post-procedure.
Results
Sixty-nine cryoablations of bone (42/69, 61 %), soft tissue (17/69, 25 %) and nerve (10/69,14 %) were performed without interrupting ongoing traditional chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, investigational clinical trial therapy, or hormone therapy in 32/69 (35 %), 26/69 (38 %), 14/69 (20 %), 5/69 (7 %) respectively. There were 3/69 (4 %) patients with neutropenia (defined as absolute neutrophil count <1500 cells/mL). Agents known to delay wound healing (such as VEGF/R, E/FGFR inhibitors) or chronic steroids were not interrupted in 9/69 (13 %) and 36/69 (52 %) respectively. Prior to cryoablation, the treatment zone was previously embolized in 8/69 (12 %) and irradiated in 34/69 (49 %). By mean clinical follow up of 41 days (range, 1–98 days post-cryoablation), no procedure-site infections nor wound healing complications occurred.
Conclusion
Wound healing abnormalities were not observed when performing percutaneous cryoablation with uninterrupted systemic therapies in this study, even in treatment zones that had received radiotherapy and embolization.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Clinical Imaging is to publish, in a timely manner, the very best radiology research from the United States and around the world with special attention to the impact of medical imaging on patient care. The journal''s publications cover all imaging modalities, radiology issues related to patients, policy and practice improvements, and clinically-oriented imaging physics and informatics. The journal is a valuable resource for practicing radiologists, radiologists-in-training and other clinicians with an interest in imaging. Papers are carefully peer-reviewed and selected by our experienced subject editors who are leading experts spanning the range of imaging sub-specialties, which include:
-Body Imaging-
Breast Imaging-
Cardiothoracic Imaging-
Imaging Physics and Informatics-
Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine-
Musculoskeletal and Emergency Imaging-
Neuroradiology-
Practice, Policy & Education-
Pediatric Imaging-
Vascular and Interventional Radiology