频率稳定服务,以补偿可再生能源占主导地位的电力系统的低惯性

IF 3.8 3区 经济学 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Shilpa Bindu , Lukas Sigrist , José Pablo Chaves Ávila
{"title":"频率稳定服务,以补偿可再生能源占主导地位的电力系统的低惯性","authors":"Shilpa Bindu ,&nbsp;Lukas Sigrist ,&nbsp;José Pablo Chaves Ávila","doi":"10.1016/j.jup.2025.101938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The shift towards non-synchronous generation reduces system inertia, creating operational challenges in power systems worldwide. This inertia challenge depends on the synchronous grid size, generation mix, and the existing portfolio of services procured by the system operators. This study examines how five European countries from different synchronous areas address these challenges, focusing on the market-based procurement of inertia-related services. We provide a theoretical background on why stability service markets are challenging to design due to the interplay between different services and their costs. Further, we use a theoretical market framework to analyze the market design elements and to see how aligned they are with the evolving needs of the power system. Our findings stress the importance of investment incentives for low-carbon technologies and proactive market designs to meet evolving stability needs, offering guidance for power systems integrating a high share of renewables.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23554,"journal":{"name":"Utilities Policy","volume":"95 ","pages":"Article 101938"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frequency stability services to compensate for low inertia in renewable-dominated power systems\",\"authors\":\"Shilpa Bindu ,&nbsp;Lukas Sigrist ,&nbsp;José Pablo Chaves Ávila\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jup.2025.101938\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The shift towards non-synchronous generation reduces system inertia, creating operational challenges in power systems worldwide. This inertia challenge depends on the synchronous grid size, generation mix, and the existing portfolio of services procured by the system operators. This study examines how five European countries from different synchronous areas address these challenges, focusing on the market-based procurement of inertia-related services. We provide a theoretical background on why stability service markets are challenging to design due to the interplay between different services and their costs. Further, we use a theoretical market framework to analyze the market design elements and to see how aligned they are with the evolving needs of the power system. Our findings stress the importance of investment incentives for low-carbon technologies and proactive market designs to meet evolving stability needs, offering guidance for power systems integrating a high share of renewables.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23554,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Utilities Policy\",\"volume\":\"95 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101938\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Utilities Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725000530\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utilities Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178725000530","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

向非同步发电的转变减少了系统惯性,为全球电力系统带来了运营挑战。这种惯性挑战取决于同步电网的规模、发电组合以及系统运营商所采购的现有服务组合。本研究考察了来自不同同步地区的五个欧洲国家如何应对这些挑战,重点是基于市场的惯性相关服务采购。我们提供了一个理论背景,为什么稳定服务市场是具有挑战性的设计,由于不同的服务和他们的成本之间的相互作用。此外,我们使用理论市场框架来分析市场设计要素,并了解它们如何与电力系统不断变化的需求相一致。我们的研究结果强调了对低碳技术的投资激励和积极的市场设计的重要性,以满足不断变化的稳定性需求,为整合高份额可再生能源的电力系统提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Frequency stability services to compensate for low inertia in renewable-dominated power systems
The shift towards non-synchronous generation reduces system inertia, creating operational challenges in power systems worldwide. This inertia challenge depends on the synchronous grid size, generation mix, and the existing portfolio of services procured by the system operators. This study examines how five European countries from different synchronous areas address these challenges, focusing on the market-based procurement of inertia-related services. We provide a theoretical background on why stability service markets are challenging to design due to the interplay between different services and their costs. Further, we use a theoretical market framework to analyze the market design elements and to see how aligned they are with the evolving needs of the power system. Our findings stress the importance of investment incentives for low-carbon technologies and proactive market designs to meet evolving stability needs, offering guidance for power systems integrating a high share of renewables.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Utilities Policy
Utilities Policy ENERGY & FUELS-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Utilities Policy is deliberately international, interdisciplinary, and intersectoral. Articles address utility trends and issues in both developed and developing economies. Authors and reviewers come from various disciplines, including economics, political science, sociology, law, finance, accounting, management, and engineering. Areas of focus include the utility and network industries providing essential electricity, natural gas, water and wastewater, solid waste, communications, broadband, postal, and public transportation services. Utilities Policy invites submissions that apply various quantitative and qualitative methods. Contributions are welcome from both established and emerging scholars as well as accomplished practitioners. Interdisciplinary, comparative, and applied works are encouraged. Submissions to the journal should have a clear focus on governance, performance, and/or analysis of public utilities with an aim toward informing the policymaking process and providing recommendations as appropriate. Relevant topics and issues include but are not limited to industry structures and ownership, market design and dynamics, economic development, resource planning, system modeling, accounting and finance, infrastructure investment, supply and demand efficiency, strategic management and productivity, network operations and integration, supply chains, adaptation and flexibility, service-quality standards, benchmarking and metrics, benefit-cost analysis, behavior and incentives, pricing and demand response, economic and environmental regulation, regulatory performance and impact, restructuring and deregulation, and policy institutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信