错误信息敏感性分析

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Yara Kyrychenko , Hyunjin J. Koo , Rakoen Maertens , Jon Roozenbeek , Sander van der Linden , Friedrich M. Götz
{"title":"错误信息敏感性分析","authors":"Yara Kyrychenko ,&nbsp;Hyunjin J. Koo ,&nbsp;Rakoen Maertens ,&nbsp;Jon Roozenbeek ,&nbsp;Sander van der Linden ,&nbsp;Friedrich M. Götz","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The global spread of misinformation poses a serious threat to the functioning of societies worldwide. But who falls for it? In this study, 66,242 individuals from 24 countries completed the Misinformation Susceptibility Test (MIST) and indicated their self-perceived misinformation discernment ability. Multilevel modelling showed that Generation Z, non-male, less educated, and more conservative individuals were more vulnerable to misinformation. Furthermore, while individuals' confidence in detecting misinformation was generally associated with better actual discernment, the degree to which perceived ability matched actual ability varied across subgroups. That is, whereas women were especially accurate in assessing their ability, extreme conservatives' perceived ability showed little relation to their actual misinformation discernment. Meanwhile, across all generations, Gen Z perceived their misinformation discernment ability most accurately, despite performing worst on the test. Taken together, our analyses provide the first systematic and holistic profile of misinformation susceptibility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"241 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Profiling misinformation susceptibility\",\"authors\":\"Yara Kyrychenko ,&nbsp;Hyunjin J. Koo ,&nbsp;Rakoen Maertens ,&nbsp;Jon Roozenbeek ,&nbsp;Sander van der Linden ,&nbsp;Friedrich M. Götz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The global spread of misinformation poses a serious threat to the functioning of societies worldwide. But who falls for it? In this study, 66,242 individuals from 24 countries completed the Misinformation Susceptibility Test (MIST) and indicated their self-perceived misinformation discernment ability. Multilevel modelling showed that Generation Z, non-male, less educated, and more conservative individuals were more vulnerable to misinformation. Furthermore, while individuals' confidence in detecting misinformation was generally associated with better actual discernment, the degree to which perceived ability matched actual ability varied across subgroups. That is, whereas women were especially accurate in assessing their ability, extreme conservatives' perceived ability showed little relation to their actual misinformation discernment. Meanwhile, across all generations, Gen Z perceived their misinformation discernment ability most accurately, despite performing worst on the test. Taken together, our analyses provide the first systematic and holistic profile of misinformation susceptibility.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personality and Individual Differences\",\"volume\":\"241 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personality and Individual Differences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925001394\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925001394","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

错误信息的全球传播对全世界社会的运作构成严重威胁。但谁会上当呢?在本研究中,来自24个国家的66242人完成了错误信息敏感性测试(MIST),并测试了他们自我感知的错误信息识别能力。多层模型显示,Z世代、非男性、受教育程度较低和更保守的人更容易受到错误信息的影响。此外,虽然个人在发现错误信息方面的信心通常与更好的实际辨别能力有关,但感知能力与实际能力的匹配程度在各个亚组之间有所不同。也就是说,尽管女性在评估自己的能力时特别准确,但极端保守主义者的感知能力与他们实际的错误信息辨别能力几乎没有关系。与此同时,在所有世代中,Z世代对自己识别错误信息能力的认知最为准确,尽管他们在测试中表现最差。总之,我们的分析提供了错误信息敏感性的第一个系统和整体概况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Profiling misinformation susceptibility
The global spread of misinformation poses a serious threat to the functioning of societies worldwide. But who falls for it? In this study, 66,242 individuals from 24 countries completed the Misinformation Susceptibility Test (MIST) and indicated their self-perceived misinformation discernment ability. Multilevel modelling showed that Generation Z, non-male, less educated, and more conservative individuals were more vulnerable to misinformation. Furthermore, while individuals' confidence in detecting misinformation was generally associated with better actual discernment, the degree to which perceived ability matched actual ability varied across subgroups. That is, whereas women were especially accurate in assessing their ability, extreme conservatives' perceived ability showed little relation to their actual misinformation discernment. Meanwhile, across all generations, Gen Z perceived their misinformation discernment ability most accurately, despite performing worst on the test. Taken together, our analyses provide the first systematic and holistic profile of misinformation susceptibility.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
577
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信