学生对学校声景和幸福感的感知:自然和音乐声音的混合方法检验

IF 7.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Hatice Kurukose Cal , Francesco Aletta , Jian Kang , Peter Clarke
{"title":"学生对学校声景和幸福感的感知:自然和音乐声音的混合方法检验","authors":"Hatice Kurukose Cal ,&nbsp;Francesco Aletta ,&nbsp;Jian Kang ,&nbsp;Peter Clarke","doi":"10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.112946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores the effects of natural and musical sounds on students’ sound perception and wellbeing within school environments. The methodology encompassed quantitative and qualitative methods, including pre- and post-intervention questionnaires, structured observations during the interventions, interviews and measurements. A total of 242 students completed a baseline questionnaire, followed by 275 students after a natural sound intervention and 236 after a music intervention. In total, 163 traceable questionnaires were available across all three phases. Additionally, interviews with four staff members, based on their observation,s provided qualitative insights. A repeated-measures ANOVA revealed a significant main effect of the interventions on Comfort (F(2486)=5.62,<em>p</em> = 0.004) and Content (F(2486)=4.87,<em>p</em> = 0.009) with the music intervention showing the highest increase. However, Wellbeing scores remained stable across conditions (F(2486)=1.02,<em>p</em> = 0.36). Qualitative data revealed that natural sounds masked disruptive noises, fostering a calmer environment, while musical sounds elicited mixed reactions, with some students feeling engaged and others distracted. Teachers noted reduced noise disturbances, particularly during the natural sound intervention. Soundscape perception analysis indicated that both interventions enhanced students' auditory experiences, increasing overall soundscape satisfaction. These findings highlight the potential of sound interventions to improve school environments, particularly in terms of comfort and content.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9273,"journal":{"name":"Building and Environment","volume":"277 ","pages":"Article 112946"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Student perception of school soundscapes and wellbeing: A mixed methods examination of natural and musical sounds\",\"authors\":\"Hatice Kurukose Cal ,&nbsp;Francesco Aletta ,&nbsp;Jian Kang ,&nbsp;Peter Clarke\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.112946\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study explores the effects of natural and musical sounds on students’ sound perception and wellbeing within school environments. The methodology encompassed quantitative and qualitative methods, including pre- and post-intervention questionnaires, structured observations during the interventions, interviews and measurements. A total of 242 students completed a baseline questionnaire, followed by 275 students after a natural sound intervention and 236 after a music intervention. In total, 163 traceable questionnaires were available across all three phases. Additionally, interviews with four staff members, based on their observation,s provided qualitative insights. A repeated-measures ANOVA revealed a significant main effect of the interventions on Comfort (F(2486)=5.62,<em>p</em> = 0.004) and Content (F(2486)=4.87,<em>p</em> = 0.009) with the music intervention showing the highest increase. However, Wellbeing scores remained stable across conditions (F(2486)=1.02,<em>p</em> = 0.36). Qualitative data revealed that natural sounds masked disruptive noises, fostering a calmer environment, while musical sounds elicited mixed reactions, with some students feeling engaged and others distracted. Teachers noted reduced noise disturbances, particularly during the natural sound intervention. Soundscape perception analysis indicated that both interventions enhanced students' auditory experiences, increasing overall soundscape satisfaction. These findings highlight the potential of sound interventions to improve school environments, particularly in terms of comfort and content.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Building and Environment\",\"volume\":\"277 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112946\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Building and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132325004287\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360132325004287","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了自然和音乐的声音对学生在学校环境中的声音感知和幸福感的影响。方法包括定量和定性方法,包括干预前和干预后的问卷调查,干预期间的结构化观察,访谈和测量。共有242名学生完成了基线问卷,随后是275名接受自然声音干预的学生和236名接受音乐干预的学生。在所有三个阶段,总共有163份可追溯的问卷。此外,根据四名工作人员的观察,对他们进行了访谈,提供了定性的见解。重复测量方差分析显示,干预对舒适度(F(2486)=5.62,p = 0.004)和内容(F(2486)=4.87,p = 0.009)有显著的主要影响,其中音乐干预显示出最高的增加。然而,幸福感得分在不同条件下保持稳定(F(2486)=1.02,p = 0.36)。定性数据显示,自然的声音掩盖了破坏性的噪音,营造了一个更平静的环境,而音乐的声音引起了不同的反应,一些学生感到专注,而另一些学生则感到分心。老师们注意到噪音干扰减少了,特别是在自然声音干预期间。声景感知分析表明,两种干预措施均能增强学生的听觉体验,提高整体声景满意度。这些发现强调了健全的干预措施在改善学校环境方面的潜力,特别是在舒适和内容方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Student perception of school soundscapes and wellbeing: A mixed methods examination of natural and musical sounds
This study explores the effects of natural and musical sounds on students’ sound perception and wellbeing within school environments. The methodology encompassed quantitative and qualitative methods, including pre- and post-intervention questionnaires, structured observations during the interventions, interviews and measurements. A total of 242 students completed a baseline questionnaire, followed by 275 students after a natural sound intervention and 236 after a music intervention. In total, 163 traceable questionnaires were available across all three phases. Additionally, interviews with four staff members, based on their observation,s provided qualitative insights. A repeated-measures ANOVA revealed a significant main effect of the interventions on Comfort (F(2486)=5.62,p = 0.004) and Content (F(2486)=4.87,p = 0.009) with the music intervention showing the highest increase. However, Wellbeing scores remained stable across conditions (F(2486)=1.02,p = 0.36). Qualitative data revealed that natural sounds masked disruptive noises, fostering a calmer environment, while musical sounds elicited mixed reactions, with some students feeling engaged and others distracted. Teachers noted reduced noise disturbances, particularly during the natural sound intervention. Soundscape perception analysis indicated that both interventions enhanced students' auditory experiences, increasing overall soundscape satisfaction. These findings highlight the potential of sound interventions to improve school environments, particularly in terms of comfort and content.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Building and Environment
Building and Environment 工程技术-工程:环境
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
23.00%
发文量
1130
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Building and Environment, an international journal, is dedicated to publishing original research papers, comprehensive review articles, editorials, and short communications in the fields of building science, urban physics, and human interaction with the indoor and outdoor built environment. The journal emphasizes innovative technologies and knowledge verified through measurement and analysis. It covers environmental performance across various spatial scales, from cities and communities to buildings and systems, fostering collaborative, multi-disciplinary research with broader significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信