{"title":"新型美学区即刻放置修复种植体的临床表现。前瞻性病例系列的3年随访","authors":"Frank Schwarz, Georgina Trimpou, Alexa Montada, Karina Obreja, Puria Parvini, Amira Begić","doi":"10.1111/clr.14438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AimTo assess the medium‐term implant success and survival rates of immediately placed and restored implants with a novel design in the esthetic zone.Materials and MethodsA total of <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 20 patients had received immediately placed tapered, two‐part implants with a progressive thread design (PL) (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 20) and an immediate “non full‐functional” loading (patient‐specific abutments) for single tooth replacements in the anterior maxilla. Implant survival and success (e.g., bleeding on probing—BOP, probing pocket depth—PD, mucosal recession—MR) were assessed at 24 and 36 months following final restoration (i.e., 12 weeks after implant placement). Patient‐reported outcomes were evaluated at 36 months.ResultsA total of four patients were lost to follow‐up, resulting in 16 patients included in the analysis. At 24 and 36 months, implant survival amounted to 100%, respectively. Non‐significant changes to baseline were noted at 24 and 36 months for mean <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">BOP</jats:styled-content> (9.37 (29.7)%, 9.38 (26.5)%), <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PD</jats:styled-content> (−0.45 (0.88)mm, −0.34 (0.74)mm), and <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">MR</jats:styled-content> (0.0 (0.0)mm, 0.0 (0.02)mm) values. Pink esthetic score—<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\">PES</jats:styled-content> values amounted to 13.0 (1.22) and 12.62 (1.42) at 24 and 36 months. Technical and mechanical complications were not observed. Patients expressed an overall high satisfaction at 36 months.ConclusionsThe presented immediacy protocol was associated with high survival and success rates as well as a high patient satisfaction in the medium‐term.","PeriodicalId":10455,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Performance of Immediately Placed and Restored Implants With a Novel Design in the Esthetic Zone. A 3‐Year Follow‐Up of Prospective Case Series\",\"authors\":\"Frank Schwarz, Georgina Trimpou, Alexa Montada, Karina Obreja, Puria Parvini, Amira Begić\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/clr.14438\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AimTo assess the medium‐term implant success and survival rates of immediately placed and restored implants with a novel design in the esthetic zone.Materials and MethodsA total of <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 20 patients had received immediately placed tapered, two‐part implants with a progressive thread design (PL) (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 20) and an immediate “non full‐functional” loading (patient‐specific abutments) for single tooth replacements in the anterior maxilla. Implant survival and success (e.g., bleeding on probing—BOP, probing pocket depth—PD, mucosal recession—MR) were assessed at 24 and 36 months following final restoration (i.e., 12 weeks after implant placement). Patient‐reported outcomes were evaluated at 36 months.ResultsA total of four patients were lost to follow‐up, resulting in 16 patients included in the analysis. At 24 and 36 months, implant survival amounted to 100%, respectively. Non‐significant changes to baseline were noted at 24 and 36 months for mean <jats:styled-content style=\\\"fixed-case\\\">BOP</jats:styled-content> (9.37 (29.7)%, 9.38 (26.5)%), <jats:styled-content style=\\\"fixed-case\\\">PD</jats:styled-content> (−0.45 (0.88)mm, −0.34 (0.74)mm), and <jats:styled-content style=\\\"fixed-case\\\">MR</jats:styled-content> (0.0 (0.0)mm, 0.0 (0.02)mm) values. Pink esthetic score—<jats:styled-content style=\\\"fixed-case\\\">PES</jats:styled-content> values amounted to 13.0 (1.22) and 12.62 (1.42) at 24 and 36 months. Technical and mechanical complications were not observed. Patients expressed an overall high satisfaction at 36 months.ConclusionsThe presented immediacy protocol was associated with high survival and success rates as well as a high patient satisfaction in the medium‐term.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Oral Implants Research\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Oral Implants Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14438\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Implants Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14438","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical Performance of Immediately Placed and Restored Implants With a Novel Design in the Esthetic Zone. A 3‐Year Follow‐Up of Prospective Case Series
AimTo assess the medium‐term implant success and survival rates of immediately placed and restored implants with a novel design in the esthetic zone.Materials and MethodsA total of n = 20 patients had received immediately placed tapered, two‐part implants with a progressive thread design (PL) (n = 20) and an immediate “non full‐functional” loading (patient‐specific abutments) for single tooth replacements in the anterior maxilla. Implant survival and success (e.g., bleeding on probing—BOP, probing pocket depth—PD, mucosal recession—MR) were assessed at 24 and 36 months following final restoration (i.e., 12 weeks after implant placement). Patient‐reported outcomes were evaluated at 36 months.ResultsA total of four patients were lost to follow‐up, resulting in 16 patients included in the analysis. At 24 and 36 months, implant survival amounted to 100%, respectively. Non‐significant changes to baseline were noted at 24 and 36 months for mean BOP (9.37 (29.7)%, 9.38 (26.5)%), PD (−0.45 (0.88)mm, −0.34 (0.74)mm), and MR (0.0 (0.0)mm, 0.0 (0.02)mm) values. Pink esthetic score—PES values amounted to 13.0 (1.22) and 12.62 (1.42) at 24 and 36 months. Technical and mechanical complications were not observed. Patients expressed an overall high satisfaction at 36 months.ConclusionsThe presented immediacy protocol was associated with high survival and success rates as well as a high patient satisfaction in the medium‐term.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Oral Implants Research conveys scientific progress in the field of implant dentistry and its related areas to clinicians, teachers and researchers concerned with the application of this information for the benefit of patients in need of oral implants. The journal addresses itself to clinicians, general practitioners, periodontists, oral and maxillofacial surgeons and prosthodontists, as well as to teachers, academicians and scholars involved in the education of professionals and in the scientific promotion of the field of implant dentistry.